Tommey Reed's MEG Experiments

[TommeyReed]

Hi Onepower,

Yes I agree that a Arduino program is the best way to test it. The Arduino should be able to handle the 100khz x 3 control switching.

Tom

[r2fpl]

If MEG works with NMR then frequency is very important. However, if this were the case, someone would already confirm it, because everyone is looking for the miraculous resonance frequency. Resonance alone will not give us more. A lot of people misunderstand this. Resonance is like a capacitor. You will have as much energy as you put in because the resonance is increased by a force like current, oscillations. Everyone has seen the bridge collapse but they don't understand that the force is accumulated by the wind. The amount of energy is the same.
The coil has the same properties and there is no more energy in it than what you put in it. It doesn't matter how you do it!!!
The only option is to provide additional energy. It could be an NMR transmutation. It can also be magnetostriction or piezoelectric effect or some other form based on the AB effect.
I understand that few will share my opinion because when you understand, you will have a few more years.

[onepower]

r2fpl

If MEG works with NMR then frequency is very important. However, if this were the case, someone would already confirm it, because everyone is looking for the miraculous resonance frequency.

Resonance is the point where any conditions present do not tend to oppose the oscillations present. It is the point of maximum efficiency for a given system in oscillation. However as I explained prior, in complex systems with multiple variables/resonances the odds of anyone randomly hitting on the correct combinations of variables is so low it is effectively zero. Were talking about millions or billions of possible combinations.

Resonance alone will not give us more. A lot of people misunderstand this. Resonance is like a capacitor. You will have as much energy as you put in because the resonance is increased by a force like current, oscillations.

Resonance is defined as "Electrical Resonance. In a circuit when the inductive reactance and the capacitive reactance are equal in magnitude electrical resonance occurs. The resonant frequency in an LC circuit is given by the formula. ω = 1 L C. ω = 2 π f. Where f is the frequency of the resonance, L is the inductance and C is the capacitance."

Resonance is only a means to conserve energy in a system not produce more of it. However, the resonance relationship between two or more systems in oscillation determines the energy flow between them. Which begs the question, what are we supposedly in resonance with?. Since all matter on the atomic scale is in oscillation and/or motion near the speed of light this seems like a good place to start. In effect, nuclear fission/fusion ie. transmutation shows us how much energy is actually present in matter at the atomic scale. Rather than try to smash stuff apart maybe a little finesse is the better option?.

AC

[kolbacict]

You stated earlier that Ted Anis had already done something similar.

[onepower]

r2fpl
In my opinion NMR is a dead horse because it relates to the absorption and re-emission of electromagnetic radiation. In effect, what we put in is what we get out which is not what we want. We basically change one magnetic field to affect another magnetic field and measure the delay between the two. So I fail to see how this would relate to the extraction of energy.

What generally happens is that an inventor stumbles onto to an effect they don't understand so they throw a conventional label like NMR on it to patent a device. Like the Holcomb device claiming the extra energy comes from electron spins in iron. I suspect they have literally no idea where the extra energy actually comes from but they needed some kind of conventional explanation to patent. Then everyone else jumps on the bandwagon thinking NMR/electron spins must be the answer when it probably has nothing to do with what actually happens.

This is why it's important to keep an open mind and not jump down every rabbit hole which presents itself. It's much better to do our own experiments and formulate our own theories than follow every dog and pony show on the internet.

AC