The argument for pepetual motion

[MBM]

For example, our Sun is a star and it will continue to radiate/expand energy until it turns into a red giant and explodes scattering all it's material out into the universe.

Which begs the question, if energy always radiates how did the star form in the first place?. Energy radiates but it also gravitates and the force of gravity brought all the stars material/fuel together initially. Thus a star is an energy converter, gravity brought the materials together starting the fusion reaction which is now radiating the energy it was given. This radiated energy is absorbed by other bodies which will eventually gravitate forming new stars and the cycle continues.

Do you see the pattern?, energy is always changing in form however the forms are cyclical. That which radiates at some point is absorbed and must then gravitate and repeat the radiation/gravitation energy cycle. This is why the conservation of energy must always hold. Thus the Conservation of energy can be defined by one question, if energy is radiated somewhere where does it go?. It just keeps going until it is absorbed by something else, ergo the Conservation of Energy.

Which of course always comes full circle back to the same old question... what is energy?.

AC

According to Dollard, there is no inside structure to the Sun, no fusion, it is not burning anything ("it doesn't have too, it's a converter"), only in the flares you get fusion, in the arcs. He believes that the Sun is a transformer that gets its energy from another dimension (or counter-space). You can look into the black holes on the Suns surface, that is all there is inside, darkness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3o-piMW-Fg

[rakarskiy]

    

We don't know much, we don't use the concept of adjacent dimensions, but the "universe" is multidimensional.

A good video (with a Russian narrator) is called "Materialization of Ether". I think if you put a translator, you can learn a lot of interesting things, events and facts that are silenced:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFg4UcX20O8

[lancaIV]

Darkness has a strong absorption pressure/force

Brightness has a strong reflection pressure/force

Planck and Stefan-Boltzmann physics !
The darkest black (industrial)  and the brightiest light :

https://www.the-black-market.com/musoublack-vs-black3.0-vs-vbx2/
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nature.com/articles/346802a0.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiP7bCSuZ-AAxV4TKQEHdwXCJ0QFnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw2cuVv4JttLxLlMzBpeiNNK

https://www.google.com/search?q=black+silicon&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m

Which maximal possible glasfiber to cell/modul/panel output per sqmm/sqcm/sqm  ?
Without to overload the receiver/converter !?

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=DD&NR=272727A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19891018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
Radiator/Emissor  with 10v12 W/cm² lightfocus(point) , 10v3 = KW,10v6= MW,10v9=GW,10v12=TW
1sqm/m² = 10 000 cm²

By above Winstons concentrated Watt-peak : 72 W/mm² = 72 MW/m² and

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A#

The design of the quantum well diodes for the reversible thermoelectric converter is a function of the application, and the effective temperature and intensity of the source of hot electrons. Several applications of the reversible thermoelectric converter are discussed below. In an example of a thin film metallic quantum well diode suitable for the conversion of solar energy concentrated up to 10@7 watts per square meter, layer 42 (FIGS. 2 and 3) is an evaporated aluminum film having a thickness of 140 angstroms, barrier layer 44 is evaporated aluminum oxide having a thickness of 12 angstroms and layer 40 is an evaporated copper film having a thickness of 100 angstroms. For this energy conversion application, metal electrodes are specified since amounts of power as large as concentrated solar energy can be delivered by the quantum reversible thermoelectric converter. The high power output capability results from the large electron carrier density of metals, which can be orders of magnitude larger than the most heavily doped semiconductors.



we will get dimple-simple  RE/FE converter

by perpetuum solar motion = continuum

and worldwide light (global conducting fibre network) or converted light to electricity distribution,24/365 .

wmbr
OCWL

[onepower]

MBM

According to Dollard, there is no inside structure to the Sun, no fusion, it is not burning anything ("it doesn't have too, it's a converter"), only in the flares you get fusion, in the arcs. He believes that the Sun is a transformer that gets its energy from another dimension (or counter-space). You can look into the black holes on the Suns surface, that is all there is inside, darkness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3o-piMW-Fg

In the video Dollard also claims the stars cannot be seen from space. In the link below there is a nice picture of the stars from space...

I think Dollard has been reading too many conspiracy theories. Here is a rational explanation as to why some pictures don't show the stars. https://www.iflscience.com/why-can-t-we-see-stars-in-space-photographs-38688

Stars are very dim and the light reflected by the Earth and the Moon is just so much brighter. To take good pictures in space you need to have a high shutter speed and a very short exposure, which means our planet and satellite are clearly visible but the stars often can't be seen.

Concerning the Sun and dark spots, have you ever tried to take a picture of a cave from outside it in the daytime?, I have. It shows up as a black spot because the reflected light around the cave overwhelms the dim light from inside it. My theory is, when in doubt google it.

AC

[SolarLab]

Your are aware how stupis thiis shit sounds - right!

Maybe not! (Have a look at the Parker Probe)