Global Warming, unstoppable

[TechStuf]

Ain't that just like the politicians though?  Everyone has an agenda, spinning their wheels in the mud.....while the more immediate threats are treated like the emperor's clothes, the proverbial elephant in the living room.  Imagine for a moment if the earth magically stopped turning with the U.S. on the night side....for say....just a few days.  It doesn't take an Al Gore to invent an answer.....Our own sun has a much greater, by several giant orders of magnitude, impact on our climate in hours than man's pollutive efforts have caused over hundreds of years.  So, while global warming is constantly being debated, and used for various agenda.....the 'real' powers that be have been spraying the skies all over the world, partially in an effort to reduce solar radiation from reaching the planet's surface.


Those in the know, have recorded such increases and are acting according to their heart's desire.


http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2005/05/10/global-warming-something-new-under-the-sun/

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/03/030321075236.htm

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html


Not only did the Bible correctly predict such would take place (Rev 16:, but also the earthly conditions at this time, and who would be ruling the earth!  We are told that in the final part of the days, man would take dominion over the air and go even into space. That a great 'beast' (meaning a powerful military/political machine) would even take power over the world, and to some degree, even the weather.  The 'beast' according to the Holy Scriptures would even seek to change times and seasons:

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB112258962467199210-H9je4Nilal4o52nbYCIbq6Em4.html

Ruling with this beast would be a nefarious group who call themselves Jews and are not, but are of the synagogue of satan.  Their mark, or symbol would be that of solomon.  His seal is the six pointed star, his number, 666.  Secret socieities revere solomon and use the six pointed star in their occultic practices as does their mother, the , babylon.  Their bible, the babylonian talmud is an eye opening read, let me tell you.  Yahweh promises to bring to ruin, those ruining the earth.

Rev 16:8 talks about God causing the sun to increase it's output toward the earth, and instead of repenting for their wickedness, the beast and it's followers curse His name all the more.....

There are many, many more spot on warnings contained in God's instruction manual for His children.


And the true threat to this planet is man's continued arrogance and harm toward his fellow man....and allowing himself to be mislead regarding his Creator.


For it simply will not be allowed to stand.


"I will bring to ruin, those ruining the earth" - Yahweh, The Ultimate Authority.


Blessings in Yeshua, Jesus Christ,



TS

[magkor]

So, while global warming is constantly being debated

No, it's not. Your Bible + Exxon = very, very misinformed.

Not only do you use info that does not support your agenda, it is five years old. Also, you use it dishonestly. This is from the end of the article you linked:

This major finding may help climatologists to distinguish between solar and man-made influences on climate.

Translation: this article does not claim the sun is the cause of all global warming. It states that new data gives a clearer picture as to how much IS solar (why do you denialists act as if climate scientists claim there is no solar influence? Why lie?), which allows climate scientists to more accurately measure the AGW component. So ,why pretend the article claims it's all solar? And why use a six year old article?

Here's the most up-to-date science, for your cognitively dissonant pleasure:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081217075138.htm

Supports other recent work

Joanna Haigh from Imperial College London has also studied possible links between solar variability and modern-day climate change.

“This is a careful piece of work by Jon Egill Kristjansson that appears to find no evidence for the reputed link between cosmic rays and clouds," she commented to BBC.

“It's supporting other recent work that also found no relationship," Haigh added.

Cheers

[exnihiloest]

We?re cooked. Figuratively and literally,,,


?The panel predicted temperature rises of 2-11.5 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2100?
...

Misinformation.
All the story here about the global warming swindle:
http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=-4123082535546754758

[magkor]

Misinformation.
All the story here about the global warming swindle:
http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=-4123082535546754758

My god. Why would you respond to my saying denialists rely on lies to make their case then post the most notorious set of lies ever made on the subject? Every major point in Global Warming Swindle has been shown to be lies and distortions. Literally.

Are you really not aware that at least two of the scientists in that "movie" almost sued the makers for editing the film in such a way to completely misrepresent what they said?

Why can you not think and investigate for yourself? Educate yourself:

http://fermiparadox.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/swindlers/

http://www.swindonclimate.org.uk/200703GGWS

http://www.realclimate.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_great_global_warming_swindle

http://www.csiro.au/resources/pfxg.html

It is one thing to question authority, but to offer real critique and true skepticism one must deal with the truth. Bringing lies (in all the various forms) into a discussion tells us but one thing: You have nothing to say worth listening to. One must, almost by definition, be a skeptic when associated with zero point energy research. It defies convention. But when your skepticism becomes an agenda, it is no longer a reliable guide to others. That is, while there is a great deal to mistrust from TPTB, and even other people, not everything is a conspiracy to defraud you of your life and liberty.

Consider: the people who started the research were doing their work a hundred years ago. This issue is not new, and it wasn't created by Al Gore.

If you do nothing else, read this (ALL of it):  http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.html

Wake up. Time is short.

Cheers

[Kator01]

Hello,

facts about the global-warming-swindle :

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=597d0677-2a05-47b4-b34f-b84068db11f4&p=4

In a 2003 poll conducted by German environmental researchers Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, two-thirds of more than 530 climate scientists from 27 countries surveyed did not believe that "the current state of scientific knowledge is developed well enough to allow for a reasonable assessment of the effects of greenhouse gases." About half of those polled stated that the science of climate change was not sufficiently settled to pass the issue over to policymakers at all.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/august2008/260808Climate.htm

Look at the grafics, Al Gore prooves global cooling, the vertical scale is inverse, not all people are fooled
by this :
http://www.oekologismus.de/?p=791

This Link here :
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport

was found here:

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200808211777/energy-and-environment/global-cooling-global-warming-has-ended-scientists-agree.html

If you want to read something about the energy-balance-sheet of the earth :


http://www.physiker.com/klima.htm

got to "Es ist die Sonne und nicht der Mensch" ( It´s the sun and not man ) then move to :

"2) Groessenordnungen" ( range of energy-relations )

and look for the diagramm "Leistungsaufnahme der Erde" ( power received by earth )

Input frome the sun :                                                 179 000 TW  ( Terawatt )
Variation-Limit :                                                           +-1 000 TW
Reflected back to space  :                                          54 000 TW
Nuclear-generated thermic-Energy within earth :       100 TW
Fossile-Energy procued by mankind                        10 TW  !!!!!!!!!!! which equals 0.05 ‰ ( 1/1000 ) of  total Solar input ?

Question : how can these 0.05 ‰ outperform the 99.9  % energy-input from the sun and therefore cause
gloabl warming ?

You can only educate yourself, if you use common sense based on real scientific data.... and
above all : do not believe politicians.

There is almost no sientific consensous and therefore we have to rely on facts ( presented above at this german physisc-website ).

I hope we can finish this useless discussion. I do.

Regards

Kator01