Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[hartiberlin]

Here are the exact dimension and parameter of my
coil:

coil is wound 3 coils over each other.

diameter of the copper laque wire:
0,17 mm
length of the wholecoil wire all in all
total of all 3 partial coils:
22250 Meters

total weight of all the copper wire : 4,65 Kg.
inner diameter of the coil: 24 cm.
height of the coil: 30 cm

ohmical resistance of the 3 partial coils:

RL1-2: 9,0 KOhm

RL3-4: 2,4 KOhm

RL5-6: 5,5 KOhm

total DC resistanece of all 3 partial coils : 16,9 KOhm.

The inductance of the whole coil was measured via the timeconstant

T= L/R .

it was : L1-6: 170 Henry.

Winding turn numbers from all 3 coils in series : ca. 29000.


You can see more pics of the coil and the old Newman setup
at:
www.overunity.com/newman2
( look into the 3rd machine pics )

ALso checkout the folder:
www.overunity.com/newman

Okay now for our German friends over here:

Spule: Die Spule wurde aus 3 einzelnen Teilspulen ?bereinander gewickelt, um auch

einmal den Strom in der Spule messen zu k?nnen.

Durchmesser des Kupferlackdrahtes : 0,17 mm.

L?nge des Drahtes aller 3 Spulen : ca. 22250 Meter.

Gewicht des gesamten Kupferdrahtes : 4,65 Kg

Innendurchmesser des Spulenk?rpers : ca. 24 cm.

H?he der Spule : ca. 30 cm.

Spulenwiderst?nde der einzelnen Teilspulen:

RL1-2: 9,0 KOhm

RL3-4: 2,4 KOhm Gesamtwiderstand aller 3 Teilspulen : 16,9 KOhm.

RL5-6: 5,5 KOhm

Die Induktivit?t der Gesamt-Spule wurde wiederum ?ber die Zeitkonstante der

Spule T= L/R gemessen. Sie betrug : L1-6: 170 Henry.

Windungszahl aller 3 Teilspulen zusammen : ca. 29000.

[hartiberlin]

So here are the next tests.

I connected the scope to the Newman coil now as Mike did it.
Okay, it is not yet the exact circuit as Mike has,
but I wanted to show that the spikes goes negative this way and that
Mike indeed did accidently invert his scopeshots.

Here is attached the circuit diagram for the 2 tests and 3 scopeshots.

The first 2 scopeshots were taken with a 0.22 uF / 1000 Volt type capacitor at the graetz bridge
and the 3rd scopeshot was taken with a 150000 uF / 30 Volts type cap at the graetz bridge.


You can see, that when Sw1 is opening, there is a sharp negative spike.

The battery voltage was already much lower then than 50 Volts, cause the batteries
were pretty discharged from other nonrelated experiments before... so in the last scopeshot
they are only around 20 Volts under load when the coil is applied via sw1.

Interesting to see is, that if the capacitor is still discharged,
as it was in the case of the 15000 uf cap , you get almost a rectangular
negative spike !

Okay, now I will try to get something working with using the 3 partial coils
from my Newman coil and switch back and forth between 2 or 3 coils
and use a positive feedback from the charged up cap from the graetz bridge.

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: the first 2 scopeshots do not show the supplied battery voltage, cause
I had to trigger at a later point in time, cause I did the switching manually and it was
otherwise not possible to take the pictures without a storage scope, which I don?t own...

[Omnibus]

@Stefan,

This is a very good idea to gather all important postings in one thread. Now it's very messy and confusing and most of the data hangs unexplained. If possible, please, make a summary of the concept and what has been demonstrated so far. Thanks.

[hstearnsjr]

I've updated my "juicer" motor per some suggestions.  It will run with external 10 volt supply at about 100 RPM. Now I need to get a better pulse generator with adjustable pulse width and phase angle. Note that the capacitor is charged with the 69 ohm coil but the discharge occurs thru the 11.2 ohm black coil.  I only need one 2n3055 transistor to do the discharging because the charging and discharging circuits are isolated.  I use 4 2N404 germanium transistors diode connected ( collector and base connected together) as the bridge rectifier because the forward drop is only 0.2 volts for germanium.  Note also that the charging coil threads 4 magnets at a time.

http://HoytStearns.com/Steorn/Bedini013.jpg
http://HoytStearns.com/Steorn/Bedini009.jpg

[NerzhDishual]

Hello load of sharp thinkers/clever builders individuals


@Harti_Berlin
170 Henries, you must be crazy!
Beware not to distub the space-time as to reinvent the Philadelphia experiment and being lost in any parallel time line. We need you.

My 2cents:
Some people are saying : this is not OU.
Of Course:  OU is imposssibe! A device that runs by itself for hours, with no battery after being slightly flicked up,is,  obviously, *not* an OU apparatus. However I whish I could act the same way with my car. OK. It stalls under a load. But is it not worth to be experimented instead of (and while) being criticized?

IMHO, this is a semantic nit picking. Perhaps Harti_Berlin should change his web domain name? Instead of "overunity.com", may I suggest him : "COP_Greater_Than_One_Dot_Com"?
Of course I'm kidding.

Else: I had not taken the time to follow this very thread during a couple of days and now I'm absolutely lost!
Actually : I'm also (you bet I'm) attempting to reproduce the Mike device as accurate as possible.
I have "nearly" all the stuff. Please notice that I have aleready built 3 working (=running) versions of the SG Bedini motor. These "motors" are not "self running" and seems? imho? to have a non conventional behavior). I'm far from a scientist, just a computer programmer.

As I was saying : I have got "nearly" all the parts (including the relay and the trans).:
So - should anybody still be reading this post- answer my question  which is?: Do you absolutely need this "mysterious" 3030 hall probe? could anybody tell me more about it?

Best