Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[Omnibus]

@Dingus_Mungus,

SMOT is the crux of the matter in these discussions.

[hartiberlin]

All,
please don?t post any SMOT related discussion into this thread,
otherwise I will delete it.

This thread is only for the Mike modification motor.

You can post SMOT related things into the other SMOT threads...

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan. (admin)

[hartiberlin]

Have not seen this posted.

This is a better drawn circuit diagram version of the Mike motor modification
thanks to user EMdevices.

See the attached picture.

Many thanks to EMdevices.

[Omnibus]

@Stefan,

Referring to SMOT is unavoidable in any thread related to devices violating principle of conservation of energy since it is the only one so far demonstrating that violation beyond doubt. At that very easily and reproducibly. SMOT also helps understand why it isn't necessary to have a self-sustaining device in order to claim violation of the conservation of energy. The only necessary thing to demonstrate such violation is to prove that output energy is more than the input.This point isn't understood by many dealing with the area of overunity. Not to say that most overunity devices are conceptually stemming from SMOT.

Understanding of the above is crucial for anyone trying to replicate Mike's device as well. It is the lack of understanding of the above that prevents many of those carrying out experiments to present actual data of the input and output energy thinking that the only thing that matters is whether or not the device is a self-sustaining one.

[hartiberlin]

Omnibus,
this is a thread for the replication attempts and for measurements
around the Mike motor.

If you want to discuss the theory behind it,
please open a new thread, but to ALL, please leave this thread
just for technical data details of replications and measurement
discussion.

Many thanks for understanding.

Regards,Stefan.