Free energy from gravitation using Newtonian Physic

[Janus20]

Hello pequade and all,

may I draw your attention to the following Website :

http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/

Scroll down to Diagramm 13 :

Try liking some more "think"

INTRODUCTION TO STEEL INERTIA QUANTUM DRIVE

Hope you enjoy this.

Kator

Thanks for the link! I like the way this guy thinks. I haven't laughed so hard in quite a while, he's got a good sense of humor.Ã, 

Have some more laughs with me. Be careful not to THINK

[Eddy Currentz]

Thanks for the link! I like the way this guy thinks. I haven't laughed so hard in quite a while, he's got a good sense of humor. 
[/quote]

Have some more laughs with me. Be careful not to THINK
[/quote]Hi Janus. I wasn't laughing derisively at Alan's work, which I think is very good, but rather at his social commentary. I find the dry wit of the British exceedingly amusing.

[pequaide]

Katore: The advantage of having two wheels with perpendicular axes is that while the overbalanced mass is in the vertical wheel gravitational acceleration causes a great deal of momentum, and when the mass that causes the overbalance has been transferred to the horizontal wheel the momentum of the system is constant because the overbalanced mass is no longer under gravitational acceleration.

Another advantage of the horizontal wheel is that it is smaller and close to the range of apparatuses that I have made and evaluated. The disk that I used on a frictionless plane was (if I remember correctly) 7 inches in diameter: a little smaller than the .1 m radius proposed for the horizontal wheel. The PVC pipes used to make cylinder and spheres machines were four and five inches.  I would imagine a large cylinder (say 5 meters) would work but the momentum transfer would occur more slowly because the rate of rotation is slower. In the smaller cylinders the motion has to be slowed by video tape or film photographs using strobe lights in order to see the cylinder stop, because if the string is not released it will restart the cylinder?s motion.

The vertical wheel can have a mass much greater than the 3 (total mass) to 1 (overbalanced mass) proposed. I have PVC pipe models that go up to 8 to 1, and the total momentum transfer is still in the blink of an eye (well maybe two blinks).  I assume there is no upper limit to the mass relationship except that the transfer of momentum to the smaller object will occur more slowly as the small mass unwraps.

I should revise the first paragraph of this entire thread by crossing out the words ?feed out?. I don?t let out the line the string simply unwraps. The string gets longer but it is simply because it is unwrapping. Some have expressed confusion about this and it was a bad choice of words, sorry. The spheres unwrap from the cylinder and absorb all of its motion.

I will try to post a few more pictures. My computer connection speed is so slow I have a hard time doing this.

[Kator01]

Hello pequaide,

is it possible that you please post here the exact link to the mad-scientist(yahoo-goup) ?

I think the construction of your proposed configuration is really not easy if its based on pure mechanical means . I am just trying to figure out an electronic solution for the momentum-transfer. But the main difficulty I have is with imagination of the force-connection between the two systems. Might take some time to ponder all this.

Kator

[pequaide]

mad_scientist@yahoogroups.com

I have a few pictures posted in files with this group but I have not posted there for quite some time.