Victor Schauberger

[Groundloop]

@Michelinho

>>The charge in the ground is magnetic current

This does not make any sense to me. A charge is not the same as a current.
And what is magnetic current? Is it the spin direction of the electrons in iron?

Do you mean that there is flowing a current in the ground? How can this current
make a charge that increases 100 volt pr. meter altitude?

Regards,
Grroundloop.

[Michelinho]

Hi Groundloop,

According to Felix Ehrenhaft, the electric current is surrounded by a magnetic field and the magnetic current is surrounded by electric charges.

The conversion process could be based on the Nathan Stubblefield cell: Iron winding primary wound with a copper wire in a transformer like action.

Sorry I can't be more explicit since we started playing with the concept only last week and it is premature to try to say more about it.

You need charges in the ground to equalize the charges developed in the atmosphere. Read the papers on Felix Ehrenhaft at rexresearch it might help.

Take care,

Michel

[Groundloop]

@Michelinho,

Thanks for taking time to answer me. I will study the Felix Ehrenhaft papers
and see if it make any sense to me.

Regards,
Groundloop.

[Michelinho]

Last year I saw pictures of a lightning strike in the backyard of my son-in-law's friend. It looked like dozen of mole tunnels that exploded upward in a radial pattern. Really weird.

Take care,

Michel

[Dr Adolf Nowak]

The one and only problem with Victor^s technology of living water is this, that it is practically only for military use. It is so that in 1 cm3 of water we have 20 kT of TNT for use (fur verfugung). For engines it is much less. For example, standard 15-18 GW (250-300 T) engine has 4-5m diameter and 30m height. But bombs and engines are of the same concept. The difference is purpose only. Thats the point.