Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



High voltage HHO by IronHead

Started by IronHead, March 08, 2007, 06:19:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

IronHead

I really believe this was just a clean 33.3 /  66.6 and she imploded . This is just the best one I ever got. I think implosion might be rare in the way I do things .But it is possible I think to have produced monoatomic  like this. If this could be done all of the time imagine and implosion engine and how much power lets say a weedeater size engine could produce . I think pulling a -100 psi vacuum might be possible this way . I am not sure. I have to try and make this happen more and key in on stability if possible.

This is a single frequency , The point of this cell is to keep up with what you are doing here.

What happened in the box RF experiment  was not hydrogen gas that was being burned. There was no warning , no bubbles of any kind and no motion that could be detected. There was no flame burn at all. There was a massive expenditure of energy.This force was not implosive. At least not from what I saw  and the force blew out.The water chamber was open top and  the "Box" was open top, it still blew apart outward. From the damage  is seemed to be in all directions.

s_c_engineering

found a page here about a browns gas electrolyser.  claiming 2400 liters per hour of browns gas in a 126 series plate setup at 11 amps at 240v.  converted to dc of course.    so with added frequencies.... more powerful gas in large amounts

http://amasci.com/weird/bgf1.html

Cost to Operate Compared to Oxy-Acetylene: p42 " Here we are paying about 4 cents per kilowatt hour.(Canada) Our 2500 Liter/hr electrolyzer draws about 10 kwh. This is 40 cents. At present, this electrolyzer uses about one liter per hour of di stilled water,when producing gas at 2500 liters per hour. I buy my water at 25cents/liter. Total cost per hour=65 cents. I bought my own little oxygen (50 cubic feet) and acetylene(40 cubic feet) bottles years ago. The deal is,I exchange these bottles f or full ones whenever I need more gas, paying for the gas but not paying rent on the bottles. It so happens that if I use my bottles down to dangerously low pressures, I can get 2500 liters of volume out of them. So, if I use gas at 2500 L/h, I can get o ne hour of use. It costs me $52 to fill these bottles. So, total cost per hour is $52. Thus my cost to operate the Brown?s Gas torch is nearly 99% less. ?If I was paying `18 cents per kilowatt hour to operate the Brown?s Gas torch, it would cost $2.05/ hour to operate. (distilled water included) This would be 96% less operating cost. p42.

If Brown's Gas is exposed to a heat source, it will expand. Implosion of this expanded gas will utilize atmospheric pressure. Numerous pumping applications and the development of atmospheric implosion motors are the result. Implosion, as a single react ion, only occurs with this gas and is impossible with other known substances! When Brown's Gas burns, it turns into water. When it is produced from water using electrolysis, it expands 1,860 to 1. Implosion is achieved with a high frequency spark of 9,00 0 Volts or higher. When subjected to electric ignition. it uniquely implodes (patented in March, 1990 after 8 years process time) producing a near perfect vacuum. Upon implosion, vacuum is 1,859. The remaining "1" becomes once again a pure form of water. Only a low decible "ping" accompanies the implosion. The speed of detonation (or burn rate) is greater than 3,600 meters per second. There is no contraction - expansion effect when the gas is imploded only contraction. Little heat is lost to the equipment in an implosion cycle. The low cost of gas production than ensures an inexpensive method for production of ultra high vacuum.   


so... stanley meyers injector which disassociates water and then uses electricity to ignite it.... hmmm 

IronHead

wow . I need to do this  . This s going to need a new thread
"vacuum is 1,859. The remaining "1" becomes once again a pure form of water."

This type of and engine would need no exhaust  just a water return and no intake  just a HHO injection. And from what I am understanding no cooling as there is little heat transfer. Will start experiments based on implosion  and use a pneumatic
cylinder for the engine simulation to start if I can maintain implosion.

Good cylinder for testing implosion effects.



s_c_engineering

according to that paragraph it may need to be heated first.  its says it expands when exposed to heat.. then you can implode it.  so when the torch burns it at around 300 degrees and you expose a voltage potential to it..   sounds alot like the center of a vortex   diassociation of water.. high voltage.. heat from the friction of water spinning and imploding onto itself

Grumpy

Browns' gas (believed to be the element "Helionon" on Walter Russell's periodic table) has been reported to "transmute" other elements.  

Ah, just build it!
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards