Inertial induction...

[iacob alex]

...can be as a "big brother" of the electromagnetic induction.

Some people play certain electric arrangements in such a manner,that is like the "small brother",receives on "free" small amounts of extra-money/power  from the "big brother".

The problem is to "talk" in such a way,and "ask" in such a manner ,for a "free" grand total of power...as Milkovic.

He plays,in my opinion an inertial induction,in a gravity frame(potential flow).

      All the Bests!  /  Alex

[iacob alex]

...can be a common, basic aspect of a pendular swinging motion in the gravity field.

A pendular mass,falls due to gravity flow,but in the same time plays an increasing interplay with the inertial property of the space.

When a pendular mass,keeping on his swinging,raises against the  gravity flow,it is "supplied",in a decreasing interplay  by the same inertial property of the space.

Can we talk as to an inertial induction phenomenon?

In a "plastic language"(that of Alexander Calder's sculptures),to play induction,we need two kinds of bodies:"stabile" and "mobile".

In an electromagnetic language,to play induction,we need two kinds of magnetic fields:a frame field and a flowing field.A mechanical motion can be an result ot their interaction.

In a possible inertial induction phenomenon,we have as a frame("stabile") ,the inertia and as a flowing field("mobile"),the gravity.A moving mass,has in the same time,an inertial and a gravitational property.

Can we make a "transfer design" from the so well known electromagnetic induction,to a possible inertial induction phenomenon?

More,can we try to apply to some actual  magnetic devices,claimed as "free energy " sources,in a new shape and arrangement:Milkovic's pendulum with a lever?

If the induction phenomenon is a widespread one,it can cover many forms,circumstances...a inertial induction,inclusive.

But,nothing quite possible new ,is right on...

                      All the  Bests!  /  Alex

[iacob alex]

    ...that of a common swinging pendulum(mechanical clock) in a fixed fulcrum/pivot,bearing is as a  "captive"  pressure,thrust, that is dissipated,lost in the support,basis.

A swinging pendular motion,in a mobile fulcrum(Milkovic,Berrett,the shadouf and many others),becomes a "free" pressure,ready to be  used by the next fulcrum.

The engines deliver the power in a pulsatory flow manner.

A clock pendulum has a "captive" pulsatory flow of energy.

A pendulum with a lever has a "free" pulsatory flow of energy.

The problem of energy is that of a difference between two states,levels.

A clock pendulum has a symmetric trajectory face to the gravity flow.

A pendulum with a lever has an asymmetric trajectory face to the gravity flow.

Can this symmetric vs. asymmetric setting side by side,uncover a difference that we can use as a source of energy?

Sometimes,the hope is our walking dream...

            All the Bests!  /  Alex

[prajna]

Didn't I just say that, yoda?

[bitRAKE]

I feel these levels are all the same - it is the same question asked for thousands of years. We can see the levels, but we are coming to an understanding of how to transition levels. When does life begin? We see the mother/father and child, but when/where does the soul come from?

Relativity was a big step - colapsing frames of reference on one level. We were so confused to see them as being on another level. Now we want to colapse the levels to a more unified understanding that will make our efforts more meaningful.

Whereas the symmetry maintains an illusion of order at that level, the asymmetry seems to bring awareness of influences from another level.  That awareness is the free energy for that level. I say awareness because it often seems to be communicative/informative - having no inherant magnitude.

This communication can be with regard to internal and external levels which further complicates use. The asymmetric level seems to be both existing and non-existing...

...hence the confusion...

...funny effects are possible though - like synchronizing multiple asymmetric systems. Or symmetry within asymmetric levels. Clearly something is being communicated!