Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



OverUnity prize money 15825 US$ total until now

Started by hartiberlin, March 28, 2007, 07:02:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

trotro

Quote from: pharao on May 25, 2008, 11:19:29 AM
1000 EURO ??
You are kidding! Thats not even the material worth for a month development wasted!
Make 1 Million! That would be a better motivation!
???

shadotrak

EUGENE HOLCOMB
USER: SHADOTRAK


I WOULD LIKE TO WORK ON THE PRIZE LOGO, DO I SUBMIT THE COMPLETED FILE TO YOU
USING THIS METHOD OR COULD I LET YOU KNOW WHEN IT IS READY TO BE SENT?

IF YOU OK THE LOGO, IN THE BASIC FORM I WILL ADD SOME BELLS AND WHISTLES.

THIS IS A GREAT IDEA.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW AT GENE@SHADOTRAK.COM


BEST REGARDS,
GENE

jason713

I have an invention written out, in my best attempt at a, patent proposal form with some diagrams.  I am not well trained in mechanics and I don?t have much time or resources to put toward the invention, but I believe in it very much.  I have submitted the invention to a patent attorney but he strongly recommended that I build a prototype and get research data to support my ?indirect perpetual motion? claims, which would very likely be thrown out in a patent review. 
I am looking to find someone who has some level of mechanical skill and the time and resources to build and confirm the claims of my invention.  If it is proven to be the invention that we are seeking, my personal desire is to direct a (not yet established) ?International Robin Hood Foundation? that would receive as much of the proceeds as possible from private energy companies, and all other companies that are given permission to profit from the invention.  The mission of the foundation will be to meet the physical and educational needs of those who are in need, anywhere and everywhere. I believe this non-profit foundation would be much easier to operate with a patent for the invention, but individuals who build the invention or any variation of it, with the freely shared designs and plans (on OU.com, etc) would never be in harm of legal prosecution.  I would desire for patent proceeds which all go to the foundation only to be made off of those who are making a profit from the invention, not those who use it purely for personal consumption.   

I expect that someone can build a prototype for less then $200US in 2 or 3 weeks if they have some mechanical experience and a decent workshop.
   
Of course this would mean that I?m not able to enter the contest because I am not able to publicly disclosing the invention, but whoever builds the first working model, after sending me the significant data I need to submit the patent would then be able to enter the OU contest. 

I believe that contest rule 5 needs to be amended to allow my ?freely shared by individuals but proceeds going to charity? plan to be accepted:
5. Patented devices do not apply, cause we want a solution that has no rights yet on it and
which would be free to build by anyone. Commercial replications must pay at least
10 to 20 % license fees to charity organisations
or simular organisations, that "feed the world" and help the poor.
This should be watched by the community to verify that commercial builder companies
really pay these licenses to charity organisations. 

But this really isn?t about some contest, it?s about changing this fossil fueled, self-destructive earth in to something that every human is proud of, and can joyfully pass on to the next generation.

I expect that some of you understand my dilemma and would be willing to work with me under a non-disclosure agreement on a temporary basis.  This would actually create a form of checks and balances, in that whoever is working with me has the ability to break their agreement if I don?t fulfill my commitment once patents have been filed.

If you are interested in more info contact me at: jason713@gmail.com

I expect that the forum will be kept up to speed as much as possible on this invention.

resonanceman

Quote from: jason713 on June 02, 2008, 12:07:38 PM
I have an invention written out, in my best attempt at a, patent proposal form with some diagrams.  I am not well trained in mechanics and I don?t have much time or resources to put toward the invention, but I believe in it very much.  I have submitted the invention to a patent attorney but he strongly recommended that I build a prototype and get research data to support my ?indirect perpetual motion? claims, which would very likely be thrown out in a patent review. 
I am looking to find someone who has some level of mechanical skill and the time and resources to build and confirm the claims of my invention.  If it is proven to be the invention that we are seeking, my personal desire is to direct a (not yet established) ?International Robin Hood Foundation? that would receive as much of the proceeds as possible from private energy companies, and all other companies that are given permission to profit from the invention.  The mission of the foundation will be to meet the physical and educational needs of those who are in need, anywhere and everywhere. I believe this non-profit foundation would be much easier to operate with a patent for the invention, but individuals who build the invention or any variation of it, with the freely shared designs and plans (on OU.com, etc) would never be in harm of legal prosecution.  I would desire for patent proceeds which all go to the foundation only to be made off of those who are making a profit from the invention, not those who use it purely for personal consumption.   

I expect that someone can build a prototype for less then $200US in 2 or 3 weeks if they have some mechanical experience and a decent workshop.
   
Of course this would mean that I?m not able to enter the contest because I am not able to publicly disclosing the invention, but whoever builds the first working model, after sending me the significant data I need to submit the patent would then be able to enter the OU contest. 

I believe that contest rule 5 needs to be amended to allow my ?freely shared by individuals but proceeds going to charity? plan to be accepted:
5. Patented devices do not apply, cause we want a solution that has no rights yet on it and
which would be free to build by anyone. Commercial replications must pay at least
10 to 20 % license fees to charity organisations
or simular organisations, that "feed the world" and help the poor.
This should be watched by the community to verify that commercial builder companies
really pay these licenses to charity organisations. 

But this really isn?t about some contest, it?s about changing this fossil fueled, self-destructive earth in to something that every human is proud of, and can joyfully pass on to the next generation.

I expect that some of you understand my dilemma and would be willing to work with me under a non-disclosure agreement on a temporary basis.  This would actually create a form of checks and balances, in that whoever is working with me has the ability to break their agreement if I don?t fulfill my commitment once patents have been filed.

If you are interested in more info contact me at: jason713@gmail.com

I expect that the forum will be kept up to speed as much as possible on this invention.

.

Jason

If   you plan on getting a patant   you are on the wrong site.

This site is about  sharing  knowledge freely .


I think if  you  do your  homework  you  will see that  for   OU  devices  a patent is not the way to go .

One reason  is  that   the patent  office will not  give you    you a patent   if  you claim OU .   
In order to get a patent  through  without lots of  problems  you have to hide any  chance  of   OU

Another   reason is   the patent  doesn't actually  protect you  from  anything .   It just documents   your  ownership  of  the intelectual  property .  If  a big  company  wants to take  your idea ........there is nothing  you can  do about it unless  you   happen to have millions  laying around for legal fees .


Most of the people  here are working on OU not so much to make some money ....... Most of us  just want to give humanity  a fighting  chance .    The powers that  be seem to be focused on maximum  profit  no matter  how much  damage it does . 

I  am not saying  that  you should not try to make money  with your idea.
Once it is  out and proven   you could   manufacture  key pieces ........and  do consulting for  people that want  a piece of the action .




gary


ncbookz

http://www.ncbookz.com

i won this  money last year and then i was attacked   because i am an inventor and you guys are
denying  this  money tome
so i  am asking you  to send the money or  just quit pretending to give the money away

thanks