Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Vidar-magnet motor MK2

Started by Low-Q, April 05, 2007, 12:07:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

Quote from: bitRAKE on April 09, 2007, 07:34:35 PM
Forgive my ignorance, but would the motor just stop about the position in the below image?

If you would attach a flywheel to the rotor axis these angles, where there is
not much positive torque could be overcome, if the integral over the torque
over a complete 360 degrees cycle is still positive !
Then we would get a selfrunning motor.

If the integral of the torque over the complete cycle adds up to zero, then it would not work.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

Low-Q

I have done some modifications to the motor by using three iron poles instead of two. I have also added a steel can to the outer magnets. In addition, there is now fully magnet on the outer magnets - no iron parts attached to them. See the picture for details.
I have now measured an average of 9 Nm in 360degrees. All measurements had a torque in the same direction (?!).

So I was thinking: Isn't it more correct to use the "Area" instead of "Contur", tool and mark the rotating parts alone to measure torque in the rotating iron parts - as all the magnets are fixed as stators?
If I do that, the torque during 360 degrees are not so promising...

Br.

Vidar

hartiberlin

Hi Vidar,
yes the 3 single rotors must be measured alone and added up.

I think the contur line will give the same as the Area tool.
it only depends on the meshes that are next to the rotors inside the airgap,
there are ocurring the forces.
So put a "trapez-circle" line inside the airgap around each rotor and then measure the torque
from stress tensor for each rotor and add this up for each rotor angle.
If you know how to use LUA scripts, you could do this in 1 degrees rotor angle intervals
and then get every sum of the rotor torques and put in into Excel or Calc
spreadsheet from OpenOffice and plot a torque versus rotor angle graph.
Then are there more positive rotor torques more than negative rotor torques
values ?
Add up their areas and you can see, if it adds up to zero or
to a positive or negative value.
If it is zero then it will not work, if it is unequal to zero, then the motor will run
either clockwise or counterclockwise.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

Jdo300

Hi Vidar,

I have used FEMME extensively and have written script files that will auto-rotate and take the torque measurements. If you attach that latest FEMME file, I'll be happy to run the simulation for you and generate a torque plot.

God Bless,
Jason O

hartiberlin

yes, Jason,
if you could please do this, this would be great,
as I don?t have time in this moment to play with it and
I would need to do it all manually, cause I don?t know LUA script language yet.
Many thanks in advance.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum