Source of energy, Testatika

[mikewatson]

A possibility is that Baumann discovered the Lochak Magnetic monopole charge which is simply produced by a beta emitter in a magnetic field or more correctly the discovery that the neutrino which accompanies beta emission can become a magnetic monopole when close to a the pole of a common magnet:-
Quote from the Prof. Lochak paper:-


The magnetic monopole is not a myth!
It has an equation, experiences and plans applications.
Georges Lochak
Fondation Louis de Broglie 23, rue Marsoulan 75012 Paris e-mail: inst.louisdebroglie @ free.fr

Abstract: The magnetic monopole is a particle with a single magnetic charge north or south, not
two opposite charges like a magnet. There is often a myth, but in reality, there is now a theory, due to the author of these lines, with equations and accurate predictions...
further quote from the George Lochak paper:-
" A phone call from Moscow.
I am fluent in Russian and I received one day in Moscow, a phone call from a physicist I do not know, Leonid Urutskoiev the Kurchatov Institute, returning from a long mission in Chernobyl at the head of a team that sought the origin of the disaster.
After ten years of observations too long to relate here, he hypothesized a flood of monopoles, from an electrical explosion (which occurred in the engine room). The flow would spread by the cooling circuit of the reactor, initiating acceleration of the nuclear process while it was being shut down to change the uranium rods.
Urutskoiev told me immediately that he thought it was "my" monopole, relying on a series of amazing events, starting with the runaway disintegration, but there were also violent attraction of electric line to the cooling system, from which came the idea of extraordinary magnetic excited enrichment of uranium debris, up to 27% Uranium 235, while the bars were only 1.1% (!) lifting and tilting on the side of the reactor cover weighing 2500 tons, so that the walls (even internal) were
intact, thus excluding gas pressure and did look for other causes, including possible change of the
gravitational field, there was again a dazzling light that was not due to a fire in the reactor, because the internal paint and graphite were intact (except in one place). All these very unusual events gave some clues for Urutskoiev to look boldly at a light magnetic monopole...."


End of quote
Baumann could have accumulated a magnetic charge provided by magnetically excited neutrinos emanated from a good beta emitter such as radium bromide doped luminous paint placed in a common magnetic field. These magnetic charges presumably act in a similar manner to electric charges producing opposite pole magnetic charge induction in iron objects close by.
Potassium chloride (salt substitute) is naturally beta radioactive (and consequent neutrino emitter) due to the presence of K40 and I have been searching for magnetic charge from that...
The need to let these magnetic charges build up may be why the the testatika did not seem to run continuously.
Mike

[gauschor]

What if the segments of the disc did not have individual charges - but the WHOLE disc was charged with one potential? I've always wondered why there weren't any discharges between the segments being so close to each other - and this could be the reason. Also the video says: "one disc is the earth, the other disc is the cloud". So one whole disc is (-), one whole disc is (+). Maybe the metal grids are just additional constructions for whatever... "to hold the charge onto the disc" so the disc doesn't lose to much charge, but in the end both disc could have different potential - unlike a Wimshurst which has both charges mixed on both discs and only on small segments.

You know: the small segments alone would not have much charge, but 2 discs fully charged could store a lot more energy.

Though I got no further idea on how to use 2 oppositely charged discs rotating contrary to each other to gain energy---

[Hel]

Gauschor, I mostly tend to think also that one disk is positive while the other negative, just like cloud and earth. Also, neither the single disk little machine nor the 3KW machine could work the way common
ES machines do (Wimshurts, Pidgeon, Dirod...) because of the strange way they're wired up. So the
two disks could actually collect positive and negative air ions respectively. The only issue is that in the
3KW machine each side collector key appears all the ways making a single piece with the rear and the
front ones, or at least being electrically interconnected (as it would be in a plain Wimshurst machine), and
believe me I'm perhaps one of the few ones who spent so much time by carefully studying those details in
an almost forensic way... so every collecting key would simply short the "ground" and the "cloud". Here's
the puzzle !
-Elena

[gauschor]

Coming from the C-Stack topic in the forum (a setup where the source battery may not be depleted) I thought maybe this is another hint how the Testatika could work. Baumann said in one interview the trick is to keep the voltage alive. And exactly in there http://jnaudin.free.fr/cstack/index.htm at the last picture (also attached, copied from website) and paragraph is a setup that could explain the principle.

So on the one hand we have a high voltage source. It rises within the flash tubes until it comes to a discharge impulse which then is transmitted via a C-Capacitor to the inner plates. The author says, the result was more intense at the output.

Edit: Oh wait... a discharge... damnit! A discharge means it has to rise again slowly...

[Hel]

The stacked capacitors always fascinated me and I built many and I experimented with them in the
past, but I really don't see how such a device could differ electronically from a "capacitor network",
to follow the author's jargon. A four plates C-stack works in no way differently than three identical
capacitors connected in series, whose four ends (both the final and the intermediate ones) are
accessible and employed. That's at least what I can say of my first hand experience with them.
I don't see how having the common plates made as two electrically connected plates rather than
a shared one may make any difference. I can witness the transformer effect of course, the fact that
it appears being a resonance frequency at which the output is maximized, either if you apply the
signal to the inner or the other plates, or even to the first and third ones... I really see nothing strange
here and nothing different than by using three normal capacitors as I descrived above.


The issue with the drawing from Cris Paltenghe and his implementation is that the 'HV' supply reported
is actually an AC one, since it was harvested from a plasma ball or such gadget. Perhaps the author
forgot this fact, marking the only one output with a plus sign, as he perhaps ignores that every HV
supply actually has TWO outputs, and while he could have not noticed the second output, it was
unavoidably capacitively-coupled with ground - so anyway the drawing is wrong/incomplete.
Also it is not clear how such a setup can work being driven by AC without diodes or other rectification
means - he SHOULD have explained that better at least. Any parasitic capacitance to ground or to other
parts should have been contemplated and also drawn correctly and mentioned.


Anyway, always bear in mind that the Testatika has NEITHER GROUND CONNECTIONS NOR AERIALS !
So, if even some C-stack is employed there, possibly also with different metals (like Cu and Al, as it
seems) - and I even tend to believe that - it is definitely employed in some very different manner.


Funny devices the C-stacks, though