Chas Campbell free power motor

[gaby de wilde]

You may be tarnishing your reputation and image here on the forum when you continually acknowledge and rub shoulders with Lawrence (Itseung888)    

HAHAHAHA, what an idiot you are. Priceless.

[gaby de wilde]

"Hi Ash,

I do not think this system works. There cannot be a simple thing that
hasn't be thought to before.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/n/nihilism.htm

[tinu]

HAHAHAHA, what an idiot you are. Priceless.

Hmmm? no one told you not to talk again when shaving, dear Gabriela?

[gaby de wilde]

HAHAHAHA, what an idiot you are. Priceless.

Hmmm? no one told you not to talk again when shaving, dear Gabriela?

Do remember to think of the harm to your credibility? Ow, I debunked that for you already.  Now you are just a clue-less rant. Damn, don't you just hate it when that happens? Lets get back to the 100 questions you asked me when my instructions didn't ask any more of you as to put a magnet in each hand. You didn't pick up the 2 magnets but you asked 100 questions. Then you said you where going to do the 15 second experiment this weekend. Debunkers are always full of excuses why they don't have time right now. So I want to know if you managed to lift up 2 magnets utilising your hands. Lets test if you are a honest individual. You seem rather dishonest and upset by the responses?

The weekend is here, where is your 15 seconds armchair rant? Your credibility is rapidly declining, lets see you try safe your precious reputation. hahahaha  It's not so hard? Maybe you can ask mum to help?  Let me spend 15 seconds adding the link for you again.

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/text/3-point-interaction

Now go be a good teenager and go do your homework before asking questions.

This topic is about Chas it's not for you to vent your puberty.

[Humbugger]

Okay Guys...I know it might sound like hypocricy coming from me, but let's get back to the topic.

I think where we left off was around when Stefan stepped out of the whirlwind discussion on the torque and ball-count calculations for the gravity wheel.  I tried numerous times to show that the calculations Stefan was making at a 4:1 ratio were in error because at that size there could never be two balls on the right side of the wheel.  See post at:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487.msg48099.html#msg48099

I don't think Stefan quite ever understood what I was stating, although Hans and rMuD were saying the same thing in different ways.  Stefan continued to ask me and others to calculate and draw using a 4:1 ratio and with two active balls on the right side of the wheel until he finally went to bed.

So, I'd like to ask Stefan and everyone else involved (rMuD and Hans have already posted their complete agreement with my statement that the system maxes out at 3.8763:1 ratio) if they understand this limitation yet or still think the system could be built with any ratio and always have at least one ball on the right side of the wheel.  It can't.  At any ratio bigger than 3.8763 there are times with no ball.  Just turn the wheel a bit clockwise in your mind.  See the 3:1 balls (solid color) and the 3.8763:1 balls (empty circles)?  Even at 3:1, there's almost no time with two balls on the right.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487.msg48221.html#msg48221   (Hans)

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487.msg48185.html#msg48185   (rMuD)

I thought we were pretty close to proving with simple straightforward torque calculations that the wheel will never cycle itself, except for this misunderstanding.

Humbugger