Chas Campbell free power motor

[Pontifex]

Hi Hans,
it sounds quite scholarly what you write about book burning but that is a pretty old hoax:

Several historians told varying accounts of a Muslim army led by Amr ibn al 'Aas sacking the city of Alexandria in 645, and that the commander asked the caliph Umar what to do with the famous library, and received the response "...if what is written in them agrees with the Koran, they are not required; if it disagrees, they are not desired. Destroy them therefore.", and thus burned the books to heat bathwater for the soldiers. However the legend has been dismissed by some as a later invention of Christian crusaders eager to justify the "barbarism" of Muslim armies.
While the first Western account of the supposed event was in Edward Pococke's 1663 century translation of History of the Dynasties, it was dismissed as a hoax or propaganda as early as 1713 by Fr. Eus?be Renaudot, and other later scholars agreed, including Alfred J. Butler.

OK, I admit being a little nitpicker.... 

Greetings, Pontifex

[sm0ky2]

 older such libararies did not need ot be burned by attacking foreign rulers. They were full of papyurs, and the only source of light was an open flame.  Libraries burned them selves down on frequent occasion. it is thought that the library of alendria burned (at least partially) on several occasions.

[Schpankme]

All perpetual motion inventors are liars, except you and me, and some times i wonder about you.

Wake-up people, your to damn gullible; it took you six (6) months to identify this hoax; "and the people pushing it".

The Big Con: How to spot an Over-Unity Hoax

o No Documentation describing claim
o No Diagrams/Schematics/Circuits
o No Replication
o No Clear photos or videos of device
o No Dismantling of device
o No third party testing allowed
o Inventor claims you need to build TEST Models before you can understand the technology.  See no Replication.
o Inventor or his company claims they need MONEY to make it work.
o Inventor doesn't personally use his newly found technology .. their always perfecting something better.  See no Replication.
o Inventor claims "decades" of success and testing but doesn't have a working model.

Feel free to add to the list.

- Schpankme

[Eddy Currentz]

Perpetual motion is indeed impossible according to the current and pervasive "Laws" of physics. It's also impossible if one has their head up their ass.
Nevertheless, the laws of Nature have never felt the compulsion to adhere to the flawed ideas of man. While man would love to think that he has conquered nature with his brilliant intellect, self flagellation and an honest look at reality are often two different things.
The most basic building block in this universe is nothing but perpetual motion. Where the atom draws it's energy from, so should we.

[shruggedatlas]

Perpetual motion is indeed impossible according to the current and pervasive "Laws" of physics. It's also impossible if one has their head up their ass.
Nevertheless, the laws of Nature have never felt the compulsion to adhere to the flawed ideas of man. While man would love to think that he has conquered nature with his brilliant intellect, self flagellation and an honest look at reality are often two different things.
The most basic building block in this universe is nothing but perpetual motion. Where the atom draws it's energy from, so should we.

More power to you for fighting the "man," but I am curious, which current laws of physics do you find flawed and upon what evidence?