Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Successful TPU-ECD replication !

Started by mrd10, June 12, 2007, 05:12:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

Earl

Jason,

your FET driver circuit has a big error.  The manufacturer's spec sheet shows a test circuit which they use to determine the switching speeds.   They simulate the large FET input capacity by using a 1nF on the driver output.

In the real world, when you use this FET driver, you must remove this 1nF capacitor; the FET gate already has 1nF or 2nF capacity and you don't want to have an additional capacitance in the form of a 1nF capacitor!

As additional comments,

  • the 4uF7 capacitor should be labeled tantal
  • the 0uF1 capacitor should be marked ceramic
  • it should be mentioned that additional parallel ceramic capacitors never hurt.  For example, additional 1nf and 10nF bypass capacitors.

Pay a lot of attention to the polarity of the tantal capacitor, if wrong polarity the tantal will catch fire and turn into a block of carbon.  Quite a spectacle.

Regards, Earl
Quote from: Jdo300 on June 19, 2007, 01:57:02 AM
Hello All,

I'm finally back from my weekend trip and thought I would take the time to draw up the the circuit diagram for my control circuit.
"It is through science that we prove, but through intuition that we discover." - H. Poincare

"Most of all, start every day asking yourself what you will do today to make the world a better place to live in."  Mark Snoswell

"As we look ahead, we have an expression in Shell, which we like to use, and that is just as the Stone Age did not end for the lack of rocks, the oil and gas age will not end for the lack oil and gas, but rather technology will move us forward." John Hofmeister, president Shell Oil Company

z_p_e

Quote from: otto on June 19, 2007, 04:03:50 AM
Hello all,

sorry I was a few days off line.

I saw the last video. A few comments:

1. there are 2 frequencies used and everything was OK. Then the 3. frequency added and nothing was OK!!!

When you use 3 frequencies, when you see that the 3rd frequency "disturbs" the other 2 frequencies then you MUST surch for better frequencies. The first 2 frequencies are NOT GOOD. You have to find a better frequency mix for your first 2 frequencies and then add the 3rd.

When all 3 frequencies are OK then you can swith off 1 frequency and the bulb shines NOT so bright as with all 3 of them. Then swith off 2 frequencies and the bulb is maybe only glowing.

In this case you know that all your 3 frequencies adds a littl power to the bulb. This is then the frequency mix you need.

This is then what I call a harmonic work off all 3 frequencies.

Otto

This is what I was thinking as well Otto...I agree. It does seem odd that the 3 frequencies would diminish the output, if adjusted properly.

Do you agree that the 3 frequencies should be harmonically related, and that the frequencies are fundamental, 1st harmonic, 2nd harmonic?

If so, I don't understand why no one is using the harmonic divider I designed, and then one only has to input one frequency. This will allow you to just sweep slowly from your chosen starting frequency, then adjust upwards for peak output power? 
???

Regards,
Darren

gyulasun

Hi Darren,

Sorry for chiming in,  the answer to your question is that you has to be always a little bit offtuned from the exact frequencies because the device may run away. (This was mentioned in one of Mannix earlier SM quotes.) 

So if the harmonic relationship holds and you start out from one single frequency and multiply them, the result harmonics will be right on spot when you hit the correct single frequency and this way you cannot make one or the other harmonic a bit offtuned, they will be right on spot too, creating the runaway situation.

Maybe your otherwise logical suggestion could still be used if the 12V power supply is greatly reduced or / and current limited / fused during the search for the right single frequency...

Gyula

ronotte

@Jason,

Earl is correct: remove the 1 nF condenser on Mosfet's Gate! It will only decrease the pulse rise-time in our case!   If I were you I'll remove the resistor either as it does not need except perhaps for safety rule.

Roberto

z_p_e

Gyula,

Indeed, using a lower supply voltage to start is an excellent suggestion, if one is really afraid of a "runaway" situation.

However, all 3 synchronized frequencies slightly off-tuned from the "big one" should also lower the output power.

Darren