Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[ronotte]

@Darren,

I've reconnected my old but complete ECD and made a few run. The best freqs are many but I may suggest to use for simulation purposes:

F1= 35 KHz
F2= 105KHz
F3= 175 KHz

Roberto

[Bob Boyce]

Hello All

While I have heard of Steven Marks of course, and the replications you all have been attempting for a while now, I had not been following the threads on this site. It wasn't until a recent post on a thread on the oupower.com forum that someone brought the parent thread of this topic to my attention. I am glad they did this, as I had not been to this site in a long time.

I have spent several days reading that thread, and the continuation on this thread, so as to get up to where you all were in this. I have finally caught up today.

First, I would like to express my gratitude for finally finding a group of people that seem to understand some of the key elements required to obtain success in this type of technology.

As many of you suspect, or are at least aware, one key to this anomoly is extremely fast switching times. This means that, in most cases, you can't simply take off the shelf waveform generators, and connect them to just any old transistors driving the coils, and expect it to work the same. I have battled this issue myself, but the hardest part I have had is getting others to understand why this extremely fast switching is so important. So whatever you use for your waveform source, you may need to process the output into very sharp and narrow pulses. Longer duration on times are just wasted power. Then take those pulses and fire them at the switching device with as much potential and current that is required to get fast and clean switching. If this requires another IC to be a driver, so be it.

Otto and ronotte, great work. As I was reading, I saw you firing all 3 frequencies into a single primary, or 3 primaries in parallel. This reminded me of some of my older research where I combined the 3 waveforms. I see that you realized, as I had, that each frequency really needs its own seperate winding to get the full impact. I don't want to interfere with your progress, as you are doing very well, and learning much as you go.

As you have probably noticed, signal phasing is VERY critical if you wish to control the beast. As you are also aware, be very careful. If you go into an avalanche, as Otto has experienced, the potential for disaster is there. Test equipment is easy to destroy, but that is not the only danger. If the system is not destroyed immediately, there is potential for an avalanche to continue to the point were a couple hundred thousand amps can flow in a flash, and this can induce a local lightning strike. Lightning discharges are the visible manifestation of the electrical interaction portion of a large induced dominant energy avalanche in nature. I know many of you won't understand this, so the key thing to keep in mind is just be careful.

So many are trying to push experimenters to "close the loop", and I offer this warning. That was my first mistake! When I removed the controlled drive energy while feeding part of the output energy back to the input, it triggered a runaway situation that resulted in an energy avalanche. You MUST maintain control, no matter the energy cost. If you must, put in a charging circuit to maintain a battery, and use that battery to run the control electronics. Do not remove the battery or other tightly controlled power source from the system, as this can lead to unstable operation and a runaway condition.

Be extremely careful with radiated energy. You can do permanent damage to yourself and others around you, as well as cause potentially dangerous interference or damage to electromagnetic sensitive devices. Your energy experiment can cause interference to medical or other instruments that are maintaining life elsewhere, like a neighbors pacemaker, or the radio comminucations of some emergency personell somewhere else. Radiation of harsh EMF is not always required, as fields can be tightly focused inwards, or shielded to curtail the unwanted effects.

On the subject of frequencies, and this seed that is being referred to. The actual frequencies are not usually critical, as long as correct harmonic relationship between the frequencies are observed. Of course the size of the coils, and the materials within proximity of those coils, will dictate what works best for that particular unit. Phase control of these frequencies is a must, if you wish to extract the maximum usable power from the dominant energy field. As was already observed, the seed (or seeds, as more than one are possible) is a localized distortion caused by the nuclear magnetic resonance of materials that are within the near magnetic field of the devices coils. Depending upon how the device is constructed, these may or may not be used to your advantage, but they are not always required to get a useful interaction between the electric, magnetic, and dominant energies.

There are literally hundreds of ways to interact with, and tap into dominant energy. Almost all require some sort of dipole charge seperation somewhere in the system. Some are better than others. Some operate on very low input vs output energy. One (Hendershot Device) operates, powering a load, with no input power whatsoever, however operational stability is not the greatest. I wish I could share the videos with the public, but I am not allowed. Most of these inventors and replicators are very private people that wish to maintain their privacy. Much of my own research has been published, but most of that is related to the integration of the energy technology with other technology for boosting overall performance.

Carry on guys, you're doing great!

Bob Boyce

[dani1]

Good posting, Bob.
According to hartiberlins compilation:
Builders take this for real:

54. However, you must have an emergency KILL switch.
??. A heat sensor buried within the collector coil.
Also the kill switch should also be connected to cut off whenever it measures
over voltage.

..dani

[z_p_e]

As per Roberto's request for using 35k, 105k, and 175k in the simulation, see attached for results.


Hope this helps.


I think that about does it for me for a while guys. I have my own work and experiments to do, which I am anxious to get started on. There are other reasons as well, but I'll leave it at that.

Regards,
Darren

[Earl]

Hi Bob,

glad to see you here.  Welcome on board.  Please stick around.

Regards, Earl

Hello All
While I have heard of Steven Marks of course, and the replications you all have been attempting for a while now, I had not been following the threads on this site. It wasn't until a recent post on a thread on the oupower.com forum that someone brought the parent thread of this topic to my attention. I am glad they did this, as I had not been to this site in a long time.
[snip]
Carry on guys, you're doing great!
Bob Boyce