Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[giantkiller]

Hi guys,
If you look at the ECD doc the primary is wrapped around the secondary. But both windings are tied together at the cw input side so this will not make a step up.

GK,

I'm not sure which document you are referring to, but if it is Roberto's pdf, I can't agree with your statement that the primary is wrapped around the secondary.

The CC is bifilar for as long as the primary winding lasts. After that, the secondary continues wrapping over top of the primary/secondary bifilar. So if anything, your statement should be reversed.

In regards to the CC being a step-up transformer or not, it quite clearly is. Secondary windings and inductance is higher than that of the primary's.

Attached here is Figure 4 from an ignition coil patent #4,516,559. If you look at either the "otto_roberto_simplified01.pdf" or "otto_roberto_simplified02.pdf" files that I posted some time ago, you will see they are almost exactly like the patent figure below. I found this patent diagram only now for illustration purposes of this post.

If you agree that an ignition coil is a step-up transformer (which it is), then you must also agree that the CC is a step-up transformer as well.

Darren

You are correct. I have wrapped overlapping jacket style, semi-bifilar on the cross-sectional plane. Not side by side on the face of the tubing. I think I am burning out. Seen much too much lately. Looking at everything cross-eyed.

I am still finishing up the controller. It has a bug in it. I swap chips and a channel doesn't work. The malfunctioning channel is never the same one when I change out chips. OUch!.

--giantkiller.

[Jon]

I have created a document with my results so far recreating the TPU. You can see it here: http://www.freeenergygroup.com/FEG-Results.pdf

[giantkiller]

I have created a document with my results so far recreating the TPU. You can see it here: http://www.freeenergygroup.com/FEG-Results.pdf

I am flattered. Thank you for these tests. It should be noted that the GK4 has 3 rings of 22 turns 16awg iron wire. What you have there looks alot like the GK3. It was a power hog and did not produce any anomalies but did show the comparison of awg to current draw. It did blow trannys. Nothing unknown there now but at the time the configuration of windings still held some magic with the current set of posters. As you might be able to tell that those renditions don't show up any more. Alot of us fell prey to the mystery. But we got to prove it, right? Either the TPU mystery will survive or we will. Somethings got to give.

Again, thanks. I wish you to continue on with your style of investigation. A new mindset is always welcome.

--giantkiller.

[otto]

Hello all,

@Rich

sorry, Im weekends at my workbench and dont even look at the forum.

About the weight of a TPU:

A looong time ago I made a TPU, as we all did. 4 segments and the Tesla patent 390721 for a rotational magnetic field.

The weight of a 6" should be ...gramms (sorry, dont remember).
I measured the weight of my TPU. Then I got an idea:
To measure the weight of my TPU while pulsing it. And so I did it.
At a very low frequency of about 1 - 5 Hz I pulsed my TPU. In the same time I could clearly see that this TPU changes its weight.

So, its clear that the TPU pulsed in the needed frequency ranges should produce energy and in the same time its weight should and will decrease.

Otto

[Earl]

Hi Otto,

what device did you use to measure the weight?

• a mechanical balance ?
• a spring scale ?
• electronic load cell type ?

Keep up the good work, regards, Earl

Hello all,
@Rich
[snip]
I measured the weight of my TPU. Then I got an idea:
To measure the weight of my TPU while pulsing it. And so I did it.
At a very low frequency of about 1 - 5 Hz I pulsed my TPU. In the same time I could clearly see that this TPU changes its weight.

So, its clear that the TPU pulsed in the needed frequency ranges should produce energy and in the same time its weight should and will decrease.
Otto