Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[pauldude000]

To otto, marco, innovation, and 13thhour.

You do not know me, but I find you all to be quite intelligent. Understand, almost everyone truly is smart, but most refuse to use their own abilities, which is a self-introduced mental handicap. The ones that do generally cannot bypass self-induced mental bias and personal ego. I define intelligence as thus, one whom is not only smart, but willing and able to bypass egoistic lazyness and examine thoroughly every discernable aspect of a problem, even if it means challenging thought restructuring.

I see this in many here at this forum, including you whom I specifically mentioned.

Everything is generally a matter of perspective. I think this is the problem here. Especially in situations where you have been mentally intimate for long periods of time with a concept, you unknowingly find yourself mentally "trapped" in a logical thought loop, thinking that what was previous guesswork is now definitive "knowledge". It is the most difficult to overcome bias of which I myself have had to deal with. Our ego's are powerfull things indeed, and unfortunately are generally counterproductive.

You are close, "I can feel it in my bones", so to speak.

What you may need is outside perspective on the subject, and possibly to step outside your current train of thought yourselves. Apply what I like to call your "mental sledgehammer". This is a form of agressive mental contemplation useable to determine flawed thinking. The most awesome concept is only as strong as its weakest part (the flaws). So, you emotionally set your theories aside, and start swinging the hammer, starting with the basic ideas, and going from there. Smash the theories apart into pieces, then bash the pieces until they fracture. Those pieces which refuse to fracture are true.

Rebuild the theory with these pieces, as you do not need to "throw out the baby with the bathwater". You will also have a much clearer picture afterwards then you had previously, and will see new avenues to approach your goal.

This technique sounds harsh, but actually is not. To re-build a more perfect sidewalk, you must first remove the old one, learning from its flawed aspects so as to not repeat them inadvertantly..

As long as anyone refuses to critically examine their own beliefs, they cannot subjectively examine anothers in an unbiased manner (having separated from pre-assuming what is or is not already true or false).

For instance, fuzzy and self-contradictory illogic prevails where bias is introduced, and flawed thinking is permitted. There are a great number of highly intelligent people whom would claim the TPU device violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics, and is in fact a "perpetual motion machine", without examining the fact that THE UNIVERSE ITSELF IS BASED UPON PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES, CALLED ATOMS..... (by definition they qualify as both machines and perpetual motion).

When one does not understand a thing, it is MUCH easier to ridicule than to think, that is the basis for the statement "sarcasm is the refuge of a weak mind". Not weak by nature, but by choice. People will ridicule your efforts, ESPECIALLY those intimately conversant with the concept, as your concept is a directly percieved challenge to their already biased viewpoints, upon which in many cases their entire lifes work might well be based, not to mention peer reviewed funding for future research.

I am willing to help in what manner I am able. However I am familiar the the TPU concept only in passing. Write out the best description of what you believe to be witnessing, and I will apply the hammer. Then we can build a new understanding and apply the hammer again.

The "Hit and miss", try this and then try that approach, will only go so far. I am willing to help since you have all publicly proclaimed your lack of greed in this matter, willing to share this knowledge with all, from what I remember in your collective posts. I will not guarantee that I can find any flaws, but if I do, I will try to clearly explain what flaw and why. I CAN guarantee that I have not been previously biased by in-depth TPU research.

It is merely an offer, which can be accepted or denied at will with absolutely no hard feelings either way. 

Paul Andrulis

[innovation_station]

hello all

my memery is not the best but i did read some where that

im not sure if it was charged particles  any how it was some kind of partical  that was the only thing that defiys the laws i wish i could find the webpage for you all

meaning  there is and always has been overunity if 1 thing will defiy the laws there are more things 

if by chance i find where i read this i will post the link

ist

well i have taken a likeing to the camara flash circuit i have if not for the tpu it will a good basis to produce some other overunity device  why?

cus it works from an aa battery    and the power out is a lot  so take power out put some back to power in and fire agin  each time building up the stored power in a cap  because you will not need all of the power produced to fire it agin you will only need 1.5 volts not the 300 it puts out i donot know of the mimiamps that is required to operate but i bet there is plenty of power there to spare so even if you have to use a battery full time with it  then you will have all of the output power for extrnal use  now if i could make that circuit charge the cap faster and release  in a closed loop then sounds like it would keep producing power  as it was used

just more craxy thoughts

this thought just came to me  if i replaced the alk battery with a nicad  and trickle charged it from the cap you would only need to charge the battery the first time after that it would recharge its self from the output cap  but it would only use a fraction of the aviabale power to recharge the batt
hummmm

anyone think it wont work?
any one think this is similar to how the tpu works?  using the right freqs of course

the thing is this sm said it was not hard at all  and that what is just explained it hot hard at all and in my thinking it will be overunity  i saw the sparks from that battery there is some massive power there from almost nothing for input this is in my opinion just about the smallest setup if you had a desire for more out put you could always use a stun gunn

last thought 4 right now  what will happin if....
you used the power out from that cap to power a mag amp? and then ampflyed the the magnetic waves inside of the amp for even larger usable power  i do realize that this hardly fits with sm's words but hummm i just dont know just sounds verry posibile  to me any ways 

[13thHouR]

To otto, marco, innovation, and 13thhour.

You do not know me, but I find you all to be quite intelligent. Understand, almost everyone truly is smart, but most refuse to use their own abilities, which is a self-introduced mental handicap. The ones that do generally cannot bypass self-induced mental bias and personal ego. I define intelligence as thus, one whom is not only smart, but willing and able to bypass egoistic lazyness and examine thoroughly every discernable aspect of a problem, even if it means challenging thought restructuring.

I see this in many here at this forum, including you whom I specifically mentioned.

Everything is generally a matter of perspective. I think this is the problem here. Especially in situations where you have been mentally intimate for long periods of time with a concept, you unknowingly find yourself mentally "trapped" in a logical thought loop, thinking that what was previous guesswork is now definitive "knowledge". It is the most difficult to overcome bias of which I myself have had to deal with. Our ego's are powerfull things indeed, and unfortunately are generally counterproductive.

You are close, "I can feel it in my bones", so to speak.

What you may need is outside perspective on the subject, and possibly to step outside your current train of thought yourselves. Apply what I like to call your "mental sledgehammer". This is a form of agressive mental contemplation useable to determine flawed thinking. The most awesome concept is only as strong as its weakest part (the flaws). So, you emotionally set your theories aside, and start swinging the hammer, starting with the basic ideas, and going from there. Smash the theories apart into pieces, then bash the pieces until they fracture. Those pieces which refuse to fracture are true.

Rebuild the theory with these pieces, as you do not need to "throw out the baby with the bathwater". You will also have a much clearer picture afterwards then you had previously, and will see new avenues to approach your goal.

This technique sounds harsh, but actually is not. To re-build a more perfect sidewalk, you must first remove the old one, learning from its flawed aspects so as to not repeat them inadvertantly..

As long as anyone refuses to critically examine their own beliefs, they cannot subjectively examine anothers in an unbiased manner (having separated from pre-assuming what is or is not already true or false).

For instance, fuzzy and self-contradictory illogic prevails where bias is introduced, and flawed thinking is permitted. There are a great number of highly intelligent people whom would claim the TPU device violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics, and is in fact a "perpetual motion machine", without examining the fact that THE UNIVERSE ITSELF IS BASED UPON PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES, CALLED ATOMS..... (by definition they qualify as both machines and perpetual motion).

When one does not understand a thing, it is MUCH easier to ridicule than to think, that is the basis for the statement "sarcasm is the refuge of a weak mind". Not weak by nature, but by choice. People will ridicule your efforts, ESPECIALLY those intimately conversant with the concept, as your concept is a directly percieved challenge to their already biased viewpoints, upon which in many cases their entire lifes work might well be based, not to mention peer reviewed funding for future research.

I am willing to help in what manner I am able. However I am familiar the the TPU concept only in passing. Write out the best description of what you believe to be witnessing, and I will apply the hammer. Then we can build a new understanding and apply the hammer again.

The "Hit and miss", try this and then try that approach, will only go so far. I am willing to help since you have all publicly proclaimed your lack of greed in this matter, willing to share this knowledge with all, from what I remember in your collective posts. I will not guarantee that I can find any flaws, but if I do, I will try to clearly explain what flaw and why. I CAN guarantee that I have not been previously biased by in-depth TPU research.

It is merely an offer, which can be accepted or denied at will with absolutely no hard feelings either way. 

Paul Andrulis

Hi paul, thanks for your input.

This is really what this is all about, you don't have to hold a Phd to give input here. It's about like minded people acting as a springboard for sparks of inspiration.

Personally I think I am 'thick as two short planks of wood', however in this I am too stupid not to know we cannot do these things. 

Some of the greatest inventions in history have been perceived by people so educationally inept. That in turn they had not been taught to think in a certain way.

Education is a good thing, but it also teaches us to replicate and not to question.



I can understand how frustrated some of the team are feeling, when you commit so much of your time to a project, it does get personal, and it hurts when others try to ridicule it or commit scams using your ideas.

Opening up and being truthful is important, but their are some issues with TPU's as Tesla discovered in his higher kick energy coils that result in rather alarming results.

So when some users are reluctant to publish some findings, this is not always about keeping it close to their chest, often they are torn between scientific sharing and moral counter arguments that such a disclosure could raise.

TPU's don't just gradually increase as you raise the efficiency of the device, their output grows exponentially (not always in electrical form) . So the difficulty is harnessing this in a way, that is not so dangerous to reseracher or the locality in which it is being tested.

Where Scalar (Soliton) waves are concerned, conventional methods of protection do not work, as they will tunnel through most objects.

[13thHouR]

A reminder, the principles which the laws of thermo dynamics are based upon where written by a philosopher, not a scientist.

Basically to paraphrase "Nobody has built a perpetual motion machine", "Therefore it cannot exist".

I still find it alarming that modern physics is based upon such absurd logic.

However it does not mean the maths that was applied to it is wrong.

Its just the basic model that is flawed, it makes assumptions that nothing exists beyond an event horizon, however as recent high energy physics experiment are proving, the latter is not actually a factual statement.

Not wishing to harp on too much about TDM (like I have not already  ), but this serves if only in conjecture to fix the problems with the basic models.

Rather uniquely TDM does not disprove the laws of thermo dynamics in a finite range, instead it allows them to exist in infinite possible finite scale versions of the universe.

Thus although they are correct in any singular finite universe, when you compare two or more scale versions of the finite universe their arguments no longer violate the logic of simple observation. Or that of theoretical possibilities that other areas of the same finite physics predict.

In the same way, TDM allows TPU's to once again obey the laws of thermo dynamics. Essentially by giving a larger model of the universe to work with.

We then realise that this is not conjuring of energy from nowhere, but instead controlled displacement of matter from another point in space time.

Setting aside that I created it, for peeps who study so called over unity, TDM is like the holy grail, as it creates a real argument that peeps who observe physics text books to the letter cannot challenge.

As to challenge TDM is to challenge the very physics they are using as their point of argument.

A reminder, 1 TDM state (A single scale finite universe) is the sum of all that we can define with classical physics.

Basically it creates solid evidence if only in conjecture, that a workable model can exist where in relative terms overunity occurs, and in non relative terms it is just simple displacement of matter that causes this. (basically no more remarkable that throwing a stone in a lake).


Its the neigh sayers and sceptics absolute nightmare 

So guys don't get disheartened, instead just point the unmovable sceptics at the TDM thread and then see if they still have so much so to say.............

[innovation_station]

a way back when maxwell wrote those laws there were 20 of them now there are as i recall there 4 or 6 only being taught 

the reasons.......  we are controled

if all of thease laws were still taught then  free engery would just make sence

as it did for tesla!!

yes paul i really liked you thoughts and im all in dude

you all know me 

william

lol!! @ william  aka 13thHouR