The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[SeanTheLight]

No object in the universe is perfectly rigid. If you had a pole of material at an insane density, and that pole was 3 light years long, modern physics tells you that when you push on that pole on your end, it immediately transfers that mechanical force to the opposite end of the pole. Rigid body physics are flawed by definition. The string is not a rigid chain of atoms, there is a time factor for any energy/force to be applied through a medium. There is indeed stretching under tension for ANY object in the universe, as the atoms on the end opposite the force, will take longer to receive that signal, through the atoms closer to force. Non-rigidity occurs at 3*10 to the 8 m/s (with a variable for density of the medium, possibly?). So if you pull a string, the end you pull on, moves towards you before that force impulse is transferred along the other atoms, at C. This all occurs way too fast for us to see with our naked eye (or most technology) but we know for a fact this is how things happen in our universe.

The string stretches on the atomic level, everyone can agree to that? The amount of stretch, the time it takes to stretch, etc, could be  calculated via atomic physics?

@Tseung - I did not drop out of this thread, I am just having a hard time getting my university friends to come on and post.

[ltseung888]

@Tseung - I did not drop out of this thread, I am just having a hard time getting my university friends to come on and post.

Dear SeanTheLight,

Take your time with your university friends.  Great Truths start out as Blasphemies. ?The Earth is round? is a typical example.  The authority at Galileo?s time thought that was blasphemy.  How many learned men came out and supported Galileo?

?Extracting Energy from Gravity? is another great truth.  Ten year from now, every one will say: ?That is obvious.  It is easy to understand.  We are using devices based on that principle.  Any scientist objecting to that must be dumb.?

Many layman and even many scientists did not believe in Einstein until the explosion of the atomic bomb.  History will repeat itself. 

Your university student friends will have to decide whether Slides 10-12 represent great Truth or Blasphemy.  Give them time.  They can post using nicknames.  We are not interested in names.  We are interested in intelligent discussions.

[Top Gun]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I was thinking about Slides 10-12.  What you have introduced so far in those slides are secondary school physics.  The average secondary school graduate who studied and passed the Physics Examination ought to understand the Physics Laws and Mathematics.

Why would the forum members have so much difficulty?  Why must they wait for the opinion from others?

I suggest that you go ahead with the remaining slides.
Slide 13 ? The correct Application of the Law of Conservation of Energy
Slide 14 ? Extending to Electron Motion Energy (Magnetic in this example)
Slide 15 ? Extending to Rotations

The reason for my suggestion is that understanding of these 3 more slides will explain why the Milkovic Pendulum is not very efficient.  The better theoretical machines should be the rotational systems with programmed feedback ? such as the 225 HP pulse motor.  Even that is not the best.

You are a theoretical physicist.  You can predict and discuss the theoretical best machine.   That will be a better use of your time and talent.  Do not waste energy in dealing with insults or teaching elementary physics.  (You are not a good Internet Physics Teacher.  The over 2,000 post here already proved that.  Use your best to benefit the World.)

[ltseung888]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I was thinking about Slides 10-12.  What you have introduced so far in those slides are secondary school physics.  The average secondary school graduate who studied and passed the Physics Examination ought to understand the Physics Laws and Mathematics.

Why would the forum members have so much difficulty?  Why must they wait for the opinion from others?

I suggest that you go ahead with the remaining slides.
Slide 13 ? The correct Application of the Law of Conservation of Energy
Slide 14 ? Extending to Electron Motion Energy (Magnetic in this example)
Slide 15 ? Extending to Rotations

The reason for my suggestion is that understanding of these 3 more slides will explain why the Milkovic Pendulum is not very efficient.  The better theoretical machines should be the rotational systems with programmed feedback ? such as the 225 HP pulse motor.  Even that is not the best.

You are a theoretical physicist.  You can predict and discuss the theoretical best machine.   That will be a better use of your time and talent.  Do not waste energy in dealing with insults or teaching elementary physics.  (You are not a good Internet Physics Teacher.  The over 2,000 post here already proved that.  Use your best to benefit the World.)

Dear Top Gun,

Since I am not a good Internet Physics Teacher, I prefer to take things slowly.  All the slides had been discussed before.  The information is already available.

It is a matter of re-discussing the slides for the benefit of the forum members who still could not understand.

For people like yourself, there is no need for re-discussion.

Please be patient.   GIve a chance for others to catch up.  A few more days or weeks will not hurt.  Think Slides 10-12.

[utilitarian]

Dear Top Gun,

Since I am not a good Internet Physics Teacher, I prefer to take things slowly.  All the slides had been discussed before.  The information is already available.

It is a matter of re-discussing the slides for the benefit of the forum members who still could not understand.

For people like yourself, there is no need for re-discussion.

Please be patient.   GIve a chance for others to catch up.  A few more days or weeks will not hurt.  Think Slides 10-12.

The multiple personality thing is charming up until the point you start arguing with yourself.