Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 79 Guests are viewing this topic.

hansvonlieven

When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

broli

Oh no just when Tseung thought Hans was gone you come back with a bang.

But guys can anyone please explain to me why that tube kept moving forward on the table? I don't even get you guys. What is a satisfactory result to you? If action does equal reaction there the tube shouldn't keep jumping forward right?

Like I said before imagen what would have if the pulse rate was in the MHz. I don't know if this is possible using physical objects but maybe applying the same idea using electro magnetic waves will do the trick...EMdrive anyone?

utilitarian

Quote from: broli on November 20, 2008, 05:45:35 AM
Oh no just when Tseung thought Hans was gone you come back with a bang.

But guys can anyone please explain to me why that tube kept moving forward on the table? I don't even get you guys. What is a satisfactory result to you? If action does equal reaction there the tube shouldn't keep jumping forward right?

Like I said before imagen what would have if the pulse rate was in the MHz. I don't know if this is possible using physical objects but maybe applying the same idea using electro magnetic waves will do the trick...EMdrive anyone?

If action equals reaction, how can you walk and make forward progress?  The tube on the table does the same thing.

I have an experiment for you that you can do without getting out of your computer chair, assuming your chair has wheels.  Lurch your body to move the chair forward.  Notice how if you go slow when you coil your body, but quickly when releasing it, you can shove yourself forward.  Are you violating the principle of conservation of momentum?  No.

utilitarian

Quote from: broli on November 20, 2008, 05:45:35 AM
Oh no just when Tseung thought Hans was gone you come back with a bang.

But guys can anyone please explain to me why that tube kept moving forward on the table? I don't even get you guys. What is a satisfactory result to you? If action does equal reaction there the tube shouldn't keep jumping forward right?

Like I said before imagen what would have if the pulse rate was in the MHz. I don't know if this is possible using physical objects but maybe applying the same idea using electro magnetic waves will do the trick...EMdrive anyone?

I will add that what you are not seeing is that the tube is slightly, ever so slightly, pushing the earth backwards.  Just like we all do when we walk.

TinselKoala

Quote from: utilitarian on November 19, 2008, 10:24:27 PM
Why on a table?  Why not on wheels or other ultra-low friction situation, so we can see the net movement of the device, as it would be if you were trying to generate lift in midair?

Don't worry, I am well aware of how to test these devices. In addition to the tests ltseung proposed, which will prove nothing, I will also run the device on a frictionless surface, as well as in the pendulum configuration.
These devices (there are many variants out there) are generally classed as "reactionless" or "inertia" drives, or Dean drives, or Cox drives. They all work (or rather don't work) in the same way: by reaction against a substrate, or for the vertical ones, resonance with the scale apparatus used for weighing.

I have a challenge to the maker of the video from China:

Do the same test, but use a leveled granite surface plate (a very smooth surface, for the non-machinists out there), some ball-bearing balls or BBs, and a piece of plate glass that weighs the same as the solenoid device. Put the BBs on the surface plate, the plate glass on the BBs, and the device on the glass plate. Actuate the pulsing electronics, and observe.

After this test is done, then decide whether you still want to spend the money on my tests.