Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 117 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

@ Lawrence:

I respectfully submit to you that if you perform the car in a box scenario the Tinselkoala suggested, you would not see the results you are looking for.  As a matter of fact, I will go one better and suggest that you use his glass and marbles method and just set the car on it with no box, and accelerate the car, it will stand still, relative to a fixed position on the table, until it runs "out of glass".  The wheels propelling the car forward will act against the glass and "bearings" and stay still.  This is because the mass of the car will not move forward as long as it has "nothing" to push against.

You may not realize it from my many posts on here, but I have great respect for you.  You have this idea and you are clinging to it.  I really do respect that.  I have to say that, although I like her, I don't think Forever has the ability to perform any experiment any better than tinselkoala has the ability to do so.  I have seen his video and presentations and I am convinced this guy knows of what he speaks.  I still think you are trying to get around Newton, and, while this might one day actually be possible, I don't think your approach is the way to do it.

But, as I have said many times, I do admire you for hanging in there no matter if you are proved right or wrong in the end.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

hansvonlieven

When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Top Gun

I know that people like to make jokes on proof-or-concept experiments.  The actual practical device is likely to be very different and much more sophisticated.  However, I again claim with absolute certainty that the Physics involved in Experiment001 is 100% correct.

The two identical magnets repelled by the electromagnet will produce equal and opposite reactions (Newton's Third Law).  They will travel in opposite directions with same velocity.  No friction is required whatsoever for their motion.

When they hit the surfaces, Newton's Second Law will apply (Force = Mass x Acceleration or Force = rate of Change of Momentum).  The force F1 hitting the padded surfaces will have a slower rate of change momentum.  This is elementary Physics and cannot be wrong. 

The trick in producing a constant pulse force is to be able to repeat the same process.  The proof-of-concept experiment with padded surface will fail after the padded surface has been pounded a few hundred times.  On a reasonable pulse rate of a few hundred poundings per minute, the padded surface will lose its shock absorption capability quickly. 

The basic theory is â€" we can produce propulsion systems that generate unbalanced forces from within.  This is very different from the misguided concept of reactionless drives.  The basic theory cannot be wrong.  Many inventors including Lee Cheung Kin are hiding their actual mechanisms because of their potential financial value.

However, they are willing to show it to the representatives (or claimed representatives) of President-Elect Obama.  I have to admire the team of President-Elect Obama.  They actually responded to the Open Letter from Lee.  Obama deserves to be the next president of USA.

Pirate88179

"Obama deserves to be the next president of USA."

Uh....no.  He is not a natural born citizen according to the constitution.  This will all come out in a few months.



Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

chrisC

Quote from: Top Gun on December 03, 2008, 09:41:29 PM
.....

The basic theory cannot be wrong.  Many inventors including Lee Cheung Kin are hiding their actual mechanisms because of their potential financial value.
....

Same old snake oil pitch. Just ask the maker of the snake oil why it is so good. Of course I'm only the salesman and you're surely find out the truth if you asked him and if he will disclose, of course...

cheers
chrisC