The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[markdansie]

Hi ,
i will be in Singapore on a business trip in two weeks time for a couple of days. Is there anything you have to demonstrate. i will have my engineer with me.
Mark

[utilitarian]

Question from Dr. James Wong

If I do not want to double the diameter of the wheel, can I use two wheels instead?

If we focus on the distance a magnet can move before the next pulse, we find that the wheel with double the diameter will have 2 x 3.1416 or more than 6 times the distance to move.

With greater distance to move, the chance of completing the lead-out process will be much higher.

We cannot always compensate with higher revolution speed.  This is a common problem with “systems requiring tuning”. 
Thus a larger wheel will have a much better chance of achieving overunity.  Most inventors who do not understand the theory would go for small prototypes because of convenience.  Failure is inevitable.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

I think Cloxxi is right.  A wheel 1m in diameter has a circumference of 3.14m.  A wheel twice as wide, 2m in diameter, has a circumference of 6.28m.  How is that 6 times bigger?  It is only twice bigger.

Is that kind of math how you got to $200M in deposits in your imaginary friend's imaginary bank account?

[ltseung888]

Hi ,
i will be in Singapore on a business trip in two weeks time for a couple of days. Is there anything you have to demonstrate. i will have my engineer with me.
Mark

Please bring your oscilloscope, the Prony device and the 0.5 HP generator.  We do not have such device in our garage workshop yet.

If the time is a couple of weeks, we may have an overunity prototype for you to take back at the price of HK$100,000.

I am sure that you will bring your own camera and video camera.

[Cloxxki]

I think Cloxxi is right.  A wheel 1m in diameter has a circumference of 3.14m.  A wheel twice as wide, 2m in diameter, has a circumference of 6.28m.  How is that 6 times bigger?  It is only twice bigger.

Is that kind of math how you got to $200M in deposits in your imaginary friend's imaginary bank account?

Thank you for understanding me.

Now allow me to make a small side step. I hope Lee's explanation will be somewhere along this line, to come to his calculations, based on the workings of his device.

Imagine a bike wheel the is OU. Each spoke nipple (32 present) on the rim helps turn the wheel by pushing in a direction parallel with their position on the rim. They need some space around them on the rim, and be mounted linearly.
We double the wheel diameter to make room for 64 spoke nipples. This also doubles power output.
The TORQUE on the axle however, in my limited understanding, might actually be * 4, due to the logically doubled wheel RADIUS. Not quite factor 6.28 here, but still.

If there is ANY technology that allows a wheel to produce energy the square of it's diameter, I've got a project to do :-)

[ltseung888]

2*pi the distance to move, for a wheel that it only twice the diameter?
Are you speaking about a property other than the circumference of the wheel?

Thank you for pointing out the mistake in mathematics.  The correct statement is that the torque is also doubled with the increased diameter.