The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Grumpy]

dupliate post.

[ltseung888]

hi all
i'm not expert or scientist and hardly understand english but still have a good mind
so
i have 5 stupid questions:
1- is it a perpetual motion claim?
2- can you replicate this experiment without using air pump?and what is the source of power that you actually use to pump air or water , i don't think you will do that manual?
3- can you use other materials rather than water ( solid maerials) and lift it up?
4-at reply 826 i see your device at a vertical position but can it work at horizontal position with a little change of its design and using the same theory?
5- this experiment used  gravity as a source of its power as i understood it, so can it worked under water where there is also gravitation power?
if all the answers are yes, thin congratulation , you have a very powerful motor and new theory of energy power

again sorry for pore language and my misunderstood

I believe you are referring to reply 845-848.  They were the original proof-of-concept experiments.  The concept we want to prove is that air is an energy carrier.  We can indeed use such energy.

Now to answer your questions:

(1)   Is it a perpetual Motion Machine Claim?
No. The claim is that we can use Energy from Still Air.

(2)   Can you replicate this experiment without using an air pump? What is the source of power that you actually use to pump air or water, I don't think you will do that manually?
-   The experiments shown on reply 845-848 used a manual beach pump.  That kind of pump is commonly used to pump beach balls or airbeds.
-   In the experiments shown on reply 845-848, we used human or manual power.  We did not take water flow rate measurements.
-   In the improved experiments (done by Mr. Ting and others), an air pump was used.  Better one-way valves, tubing, valve spacing were used.  After tuning, steady air+water flow rate was achieved.  The Input electrical energy was measured. The water flow rate was carefully measured. The height of the air+water column was measured. From these values, we could calculate the Output energy.
-   The results showed that Output Energy can be greater than Input Energy.  However, the actual figures are the intellectual property of Mr. Ting.  Mr. Ting was kind enough to state that his prototype used 1/6 the energy compared with traditional water pumps and showed a copy of his Silver Medal award certificate. 

(3)   Can you use other materials rather than water ( solid materials) and lift it up?
In our patent application, we stated that the technology can be applied to any combination of gas, liquid and solid powder.

(4)   I see your device at a vertical position but can it work at horizontal position with a little change of its design and using the same theory?
Yes.  The same theory was used in the street cleaning jets in Hong Kong.  Air+water jets rather than pure water jets were spurted out from the water carrying trucks.  One of the best demonstrations of the theory is the use of hot air and cold water jets to clear frozen pipes in cold places in China.  If cold air and hot water jets were used, the result was poorer.

(5)   This experiment used gravity as a source of its power as I understood it, so can it worked under water where there is also gravitational power?
It uses the carried-in energy of air.  Thus it can be used under water.

I hope the above answers are clear to you.  Talk to your friends knowledgeable in Physics.  There are many minor details a trained physicist will pick up without stating them in the post.

Lawrence Tseung
Ask your physicist friends to read 643 and 758.

[ltseung888]

Back to thinking about the strategy to use in Hong Kong

If we use the election platform to promote Cosmic Energy Machines, we can essentially get free publicity.  The News Media will be forced by election laws to publish our information.

However, the publicity from 磁æâ,,¢Â® may beat us to it.  磁æâ,,¢Â® already has RMB13 billion and a number of working prototypes.  They will use the Lee-Tseung theory to explain their many working prototypes.

We are in a sure-win situation.  Why should two old men worry?

Lawrence Tseung
In the end, all the Tseung posings are just "intellectual exercises" - something to keep Tseung fit to prepare for the publicity ahead.

[chrisC]

We are in a sure-win situation.  Why should two old men worry?

Lawrence Tseung

Obviously these two Chinese old men have no reputation to protect! Pretty unusual for Chinese people where face-saving is something more important than money. That says a lot why these crap-out sessions go on forever doesn't it?

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

Thank you ChrisC for your continued insult training.

I come to expect it almost like reflex action.

Did you read 643 and 758?

Have you asked your friends knowledgeable in Physics to read them?

Regards,

Lawrence