The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Paul-R]

With the flywheel in position, you have done just that.

The mechanical resonance issue could be why the results of fitting different flywheels are somewhat erratic.
Paul-R.

I should have said that the shaft/flywheel system will have a resonant frequency
when this system is subjected to a pulsed input, with or without a constant
rotational velocity component as well.

This touches on the matter - see post 21:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3927-watson-machine.html

[The Observer]

Chris C,

I would have to say you are about the biggest loser I have ever witnessed.

It appears you sit around... wait for Mr Tsueng make a comment,
                                                                               then proceed to immediately heckle the man.

                    Meanwhile, you have no f__ing idea what you are talking about !

Do you have a life of your own?
                                                       Or does your happiness depend on degrading Mr. Tseung's postings?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 You question that Gravitational Energy can be 'lead out'?
                                                     Look at the Moon / Tides Dumbass.

                                    You question that Electron Energy can be 'lead out'?
                                    Build a speaker without Ferro or Magnet ya Dipshit.

Dude, you are basically a blind mole without a clue.
           Put on your thinking cap and join us... or go have a Nice Circle Jerk with your other Heckling Buddies !

          I, and other honest members are tired of your Mindless Bullshit !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan... I politely ask that Persistent Hecklers with nothing to contribute be dealt with.
               How many useless posts are you going to allow a man?
               Hundreds of pages of attacks? ... that's not right.

Important work has been done here... is being done here... and will be done here.

            ANYONE who doesn't like it
                                         and feels the need to constantly disrupt the proceedings
                                                                                                                        does not belong here !
                             
                                                                 It's simple logic.

Cheerful Regards,
                              The Observer

P.S. Keep going Mr. Tseung.
        There is at least 1 person in America who thinks Electron and Gravitic Energy can be 'lead out'.
        You and your associates are doing Great Work.
        Thankyou !

[chrisC]

Chris C,

I would have to say you are about the biggest loser I have ever witnessed.

It appears you sit around... wait for Mr Tsueng make a comment,
                                                                               then proceed to immediately heckle the man.

                    Meanwhile, you have no f__ing idea what you are talking about !

Do you have a life of your own?
                                                       Or does your happiness depend on degrading Mr. Tseung's postings?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 You question that Gravitational Energy can be 'lead out'?
                                                     Look at the Moon / Tides Dumbass.

  ....
Cheerful Regards,
                              The Observer

P.S. Keep going Mr. Tseung.
        There is at least 1  in America who thinks Electron and Gravitic Energy can be 'lead out'.
        You and your  are doing Great Work.
        Thankyou !

Well, Mr. so called 'The Observer', (since you have no real name), let's just assume Mr. Tseung proposes something much simpler, like the Earth revolves around the moon. O.K? Now, sane people will immediately do the right thing and challenge him & verify his theories. Right?

It appears that this  'The Observer' has not been observant enough to go through hundreds of old Tseung's delusional postings (starting from the simple & wrong pendulum physics) to his lack of understanding of electro-magnetics to trying to scam $20K from 'interested' parties etc etc and now, trying to piggy back to Steorn's efforts! Are you still reading and understanding?

Now, you're the real shit-head and dumbass if you still believe in this mumbo-jumbo garbage. Get a real name!

cheers
chrisC

[The Observer]

Chris,

The fact is, you don't have any ideas when it comes to the common goal at OU.com

                              If you do have some ideas... start a thread on it.

If not, then start a website called NoFreeEnergy.com where you and your cronies can have great conversations.

   That's a laugh... Why?
                                       Because you need to cut on us to feel good about yourselves.
                                                                                                                                               It's sad.

                  You are not protecting anybody here... we can fend for ourselves !
                                                     
Get a life man,
                         The Observer

[ltseung888]

Possible Interview questions:

We shall be appearing on both the Better Hong Kong radio show and the US show being organized by Todd Hathaway.  The first session will be the Lead-Out Energy Theory.  Some relevant questions include:

1.   The greatest objection to OU devices is the Law of Conservation of Energy.  Energy cannot be created or destroyed.  Patent Offices routinely dismiss an invention as belonging to the impossible perpetual motion machine category if the inventor cannot identify the energy source.  What is the energy source of the Lead-Out Energy machines?

2.   Why is the Lead-Out Energy machine NOT an impossible perpetual motion machine?

3.   Gravitational energy can be lead-out (or bring-in) a single time if an objects rolled down a slope or fall from a height.  But we must supply energy to bring it back to its original high point.  This is the common understanding of all scientists.  How can you continuously lead-out (or bring-in) gravitational energy without supplying it totally yourself?

4.   You are saying that the horizontally pulled or pushed pendulum can lead-out gravitational energy via the tension of the string.  The vertical work done by the pendulum is equal to the vertical component of the tension times the vertical displacement.  You are claiming that this vertical work is the lead-out energy from gravity.  The mathematical proof is via the Parallelogram of Forces.  Has this proof been verified by qualified academics?

5.   If the pulled or pushed pendulum can lead-out gravitational energy, have any one ever built a device using this principle?

6.   If the Bessler’s Wheel built in the 17th Century were true, can you build a similar device with the knowledge and technology today?

7.   I know that you have shown the time difference between a wheel with falling balls in two tubes.  In one case, both tubes have identical hard surfaces at the ends(case 1).   In the other case, both tubes have one hard surface and one soft surface at the ends (case 2).  In case 1, the time of rotation was 2.5 minutes.  In case 2, the time of rotation was 5 minutes approximately.  Please explain why that verifies that Gravitational Energy was lead-out?

8.   If Gravitational Energy can be lead-out from the pulled or pushed pendulum, it is a simple matter to extend the idea to leading-out magnetic energy from a pulled or pushed magnetic pendulum.  Is the magnetic energy due to the magnetic field of the Earth?

9.   What is Electron Motion Energy?  You claimed that chemical energy is due to the different electron cloud surrounding different compounds.  Energy from chemical reactions is a form of Electron Motion Energy.  Is this view accepted by the academic community?

10.   Are you claiming that the lead-out energy machines such as the Tong Po Chi Wheel in the studio today can lead-out electron motion energy from the surrounding?  The surrounding happens to be the material around the room?

11.   Are you claiming that in space travel, you do not need to bring large quantities of chemical fuel as you can lead-out gravitational and electron motion energy that will always be present in any part of the universe?

12.   If you use some of the electron motion energy in your lead-out energy machine, what will happen to the surrounding?  Will the temperature drop? 

13.   How will the electron motion energy used be replenished?

14.   If Lead-out energy theory is correct, then many rejected patents might have to be revived as they are NOT impossible perpetual motion machines.  They are just some form of Lead-out energy machines.  What would happen to the Patent Offices around the World? 

15.   In the Tong Po Chi wheel at the studio today, you can demonstrate via the meters that the Output Energy is higher than the Input Energy.  To a layman, the evidence is absolutely conclusive.   What is the debate in the academic circles? 

16.   What is the best way to improve the Tong Po Chi device so that all academics will accept the experimental results?

Answers to the above questions will be in the Shows.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited