The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

You claim to hold an M.Sc. from Southampton University in aeronautical engineering.....

EDIT; In case you don't have the address handy   alumni@soton.ac.uk  They are waiting to hear from you.

Thank you Hans.  I managed to contact the alumni.  I look forward to meeting the many "lost" professors and friends.  This time, I can proudly tell them the correct theory of aerodynamics - using the kinetic theory of gases in motion as explanation. 

From that, I discovered how to extract energy from still air.

The latest and greatest will be the Cosmic Energy Machines and the Flying Saucer.  I am confident that they can understand my explanations better than many forum members.

Lawrence Tseung
Educated Friends from same environment Leads Out appreciation of the Lee-Tseung theory and the Flying Saucer.

[chrisC]

....
  I am confident that they can understand my explanations better than many forum members.

Lawrence Tseung
Educated Friends from same environment Leads Out appreciation of the Lee-Tseung theory and the Flying Saucer.

But then they may be normal folks like us? Certainly don't discount that possibility!

cheers
chrisC

[luciferlam]

Halo Mr.Tseung,

I have read the information of your designed system from the site.
http://www.energyfromair.com/PressA.htm
http://goldfield123.freehomepage.com/photo.html

I m interesting and want to investigate of your system though I'm not the professor or expert.
I want to ask few question to you.

Is your system can operate without any battery or electric power?
When the water is flowing through the pipe from button to the top, is the water flow's speed fast and the power strong?
Have you used your system providing power for any electric equipment in the real life?
Have you made any improvement or upgrade for your system?
If do, can you provide its information on internet?

Thankyou for reading my message.

[ltseung888]

I want to ask a few questions...

(1) Is your system can operate without any battery or electric power?

(2) When the water is flowing through the pipe from button to the top, is the water flow's speed fast and the power strong?

(3) Have you used your system providing power for any electric equipment in the real life?

(4) Have you made any improvement or upgrade for your system?
If so, can you provide the information on Internet?

Thank you for reading my message.

Answers:
(1)   The first demonstration of the concept was via a beach pump.  The beach pump was used to get air into the system and then Lead Out its energy.

(2)   The beach pump could deliver water to 8 floors (approximately 25 meters).  This has been replicated in at least 8 locations to my knowledge.  I encourage others to repeat the experiment and improve on it.  I focus on theory and I am more interested in the direct way of extracting energy from gravity.

(3)   I have not used it to generate power myself.  In theory, the raised water can flow down; turn a turbine and generate power for the air pump plus more.  If one tower is not sufficient, we can use the ?Pull water technique? as described in the original Koo accident to raise water+air to an even greater height.

(4)   I do not do experiments myself.  Mr. Terry Cheung et al set up the demonstration system at Tai Po, Hong Kong.  That system used a HK$300 air pump (rated at one-tenth horse power) to deliver water to 4 floors.  The air+water mixture can be seen in a transparent pipe section.  The water+air flow was estimated to be greater than one-tenth horse power.  However, that was not enough to feedback the air pump because of energy losses.  Mr. Raymond Ting developed an one-inch pipe delivery system.  He is in contract negotiation at present.  I shall let him disclose such information himself.

Attached is the updated file for those who are not familiar with the Extracting Energy from Still Air Concept.

[Rosphere]

@ltseung888,

I began reading about your Lead-Out Theory this evening.  I started to read some items that you had posted way back in July, (when I was not active on this forum.)  I followed your link to http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/Taiwan2a.files/frame.htm.

On this page I found some equations and values.  So, I generated a spreadsheet using this data, (and some stuff I picked at Lawrence Tech.,) in order to better consider the two energy terms.  As you can see, I have the spreadsheet calculating values at each one degree.

I then inserted a couple rows at the 9.48 degree value given at the web site; the top of which showing what the force would be at this given angle, 9.882 kg, and the one below is the value also given at the web site, 10kg.



As I wrote, I only started reading/studying this evening.  So far, so good.  Your numbers in this example jibe with my spreadsheet,... mostly.  I would not bring this up if the ratio had been given as 2.000.  However, as you can also see from the spreadsheet, this ratio approaches 2 as a limit going back to the zero angle.  I know it is not much above the limit, but it is the fact that it is above the limit that compels the anal retentive nature in me to point this out to you.  That is all.  Do with it what you will. 

I plan to continue reading more about your theory over the next few days.  What I have read, so far, is making sense.

Thank you for sharing with this forum. 

Rosphere--better late to the party then never