The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Happy Chinese New Year.  This is the year of the Rat.  Time for the New Year resolution and predictions.

The Resolutions:

(1) Continue to work on the Magneto Propulsion Unit (enhance 1165)
(2) Heavily promote the book (http://www.energyfromair.com/thebook.htm)
(3) Develop a standard presentation material so that others can use
(4) Train up at least 6 students who can use the material in (3) and do experiments
(5) Go in the direction of international cooperation

The Predictions:

1.  The Wang device will pass the 6 month certification test - may have delay but will pass within this year of the Rat.
2.  A working and improved Bedini Motor will be available to Tseung et al for demostration and improvement.
3.  The Lee-Tseung theory will be discussed in Russia (Archimedes) and USA (AERO).
4.  More jeers on the various energy forums.
5.  More OU inventions will appear and many OU inventors will study and quote the Lee-Tseung Theory.
6.  One or more Cosmic Energy Machines will be demonstrated in front of World News Media.  Top Universities will hold conferences.

I have even encouraged the engineers to read the book.  Some feedback said that it was worth publishing.
Here is an example extract:

Blue Print for the Economic Development of China in the 21st Century

Introduction

The goal of this article is to provide a concrete plan for Chinese economic engineers in guiding the country into the 21st century. In this vein, we are approaching the topic from the point of view of the economic architect, and will first discuss broad concepts and vision and then outline steps for implementation.

The broad concepts are somewhat controversial.  They include:

We must replace Win-Lose solutions with Win-Win solutions.  China cannot possibly following the doctrine of "Survival of the Fittest" which worked for the West.  China must learn from the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 and drop the Win-Lose financial solutions of options, derivative and currency futures.  Otherwise years of hard work and sacrifice could be wiped out within weeks.
Money is only a number in some Trusted Financial Institutions.  It can change from positive to negative valuation without any wrongdoing by the individual. We must view Modern Wealth as the Quality and Quantity of Meaningful Economic Activities. 
A Country such as China must increase its own money supply.  It cannot just earn it.   An individual or a small city-state such as Singapore or Hong  Kong can accumulate its wealth by the simple process of earning more and spending less.  A big country such as China cannot do that. A very modest goal of 50,000 yuan in savings per person translates to 50 trillion yuan or US$6 trillion.  Raising such money by simply exporting more than China imports would create an inconceivably huge trade imbalance.

The implementation steps are very powerful and they can be carried out simultaneously.  If they are properly done, China will be the wealthiest country in the world.....

[Koen1]

bla bla yada yada

Maybe you should stick with your free energy ideas and finally work one out in detail,
instead of acting like some kind of great socio-economic philosopher who's going to solve all of China's problems.
Utopian thinking is nice, but doesn't help to support your unfounded OU claims.
Maybe you should leave the politics to the politicians?
Now of course it is clear to all of us here that you are much better at producing tons of semi-sensible text
and nonsense than you are at actually working out any of the "free energy" devices you constantly bring up.
But to be honest I, and I assume many others here too, don't really care for all of your Chinese socio-economic
babble at all. It doesn't get us anywhere. Can't you stop posting that kind of useless plans and ideas?
Of course, that would force you to actually talk about how to get one of those hallowed FE devices you keep
bringing up to actually work and produce FE, and I suspect you'll be coming up with all kinds of silly
excuses why you "can't" or just won't do that. Or you'll come up with lots of talk again about how we don't
understand what you don't tell us and how silly that makes us in your view. I expect you will once again either
totally fail to prove anything, or will simply ignore this post again and continue with your useless ranting.

Oh, and by the way, promoting your "book" in English won't be of much use if the book is written entirely in Chinese,
as not many English speakers read Mandarin. You seem perfectly able to write Enlgish. Odd approach to publicising...

[Ben Waballs]

email from china:

$%)(&%^%$@$
Translation:

Britney Spears of clamshoot fame has inquired into our lead out 1165. Along with her, Major Todd Hathaway and his lovely wife nora will be joining us at the Wang Foo Convention Center, where all the top scientists and students A, B, oh yes and C will attend.
You will be searched at the door for drills and common sense. If you are found with either if these, you will be sentenced to the real world for the rest of your life. Funny hats and nonsense names will be mandatory. Bring cia hookers as its a sleepover.
And if you are so kindergarten, so pathetic, and so stupid to ask what the topic will be, it will be 1135! Silly!:)


PS: Koen, about what you wrote: Duh! right on man:)

[ltseung888]

Meeting of the economics students

Student A: "Have you read the book in http://www.energyfromair.com/thebook.htm?"

Student B: "It is mainly in Chinese.  A good translation is needed."

Student C: "The approach is from the China angle.  A modification from the International angle may be better."

Student D: "The book is aimed for the people who have power to dictate policies.  It is much more like advice from a think tank.  It is not meant for the average layman."

Student A: "If Social Impart is coupled with Scientific Breakthroughs, the result will really change human history."

Student B: "I like the part related to comparison with Chess Players.  There are many levels of Chess Players.  Knowing the basic rules of Chess does not make one a good Chess Player.  Playing a lot does not mean that one can be a champion.  One needs training, competition, analysis and dedication.  One top player can beat hundreds of so called players.  A top player must be able to see the possible moves ahead.  It is like the development of Cosmic Energy Machines.  Knowing Physics from the textbooks is not sufficient.  Following the crowd (including many non-physicists) is stupid.  The crowd could not see the few steps ahead."

Student C: "Tseung is talking about casting aside the doctrine of survival of the fittest.  He proposes to replace it with infinite energy and infinite wealth.  He proposes to help the less developed nation with mutual credits and model farms, model villages and model cities.  He essentially ignores the use of loans at the International level.  He will upset the ones in power more."

Student D: "The CIA of the Like will try to discredit him more.  But if the Earth is round, the Earth is round."

[ltseung888]

Meeting of Political Students

Student A: "I did a google search on Lawrence Tseung and found the following:
talk.politics.china | Google Groupsprimenet.com (Lawrence Tseung) wrote:. - Hide quoted text -. - Show quoted text -. >If I were C H Tung ?.. >I would start encouraging comments on what Hong ...
groups.google.com/.../1997-07?_done=%2Fgroup%2Ftalk.politics.china%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F1997-07%3F& - 120k - Cached - Similar pages

Student B: "So Mr. Tseung participated in political discussions years ago.  That should not be a surprise to anybody."

Student C: "It is the concept of innovative thinking that interest me.  Mr. Tseung does not blinding following the mainstream thinking - in politics, in economics, in Physics and in social affairs.  I like his idea of running innovation camps in Summer.  I would not mind attending one.  It helps to widen one's mind.  It is a variation of the out-of-the-box training."

Student D: "Many in power are afraid that you may do that.  It would upset their existing power and wealth."