The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[gaby de wilde]

http://www.google.com/patents?id=AHlYAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1955&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1


LOL You cannot be serious. The invention describes a toy dog who relies on galvanic action for its power. The electrolyte is provided with vegetables or fruit. 

If you stick a lemon up its arse the inventor claims it can run for days!

I am NOT joking, that is what it says.

I wonder where this one fits into the Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory.

Still pissing myself laughing 

Hans von Lieven

Yes, very good. The inventor made a dog toy out of his perpetual motion device where the viewer is suppose to look into item No 34. But the interesting bit is what happens after you are done laughing. You abandon the whole page because it doesn't satisfy your demands in seriousness.

You didn't find anything interesting on the page. The fact you didn't look was the reason you had never seen this patent. All you do is laugh so like a leach you need me to find them for you and rub em in your face.

If only you bothered to also look into something after laughing at it. Laurence is pretty funny at times, does that mean you should always ridicule him and play the superior life form? You are not superior, you tend to laugh and point at everything.

Even if point and laugh behavior was cool it's all you do. What ever I show you, here you come with your trashcan again?  The almighty trashcan of superiority? What you talk of lemons? The power of greyskull that is what you believe in. Like a cartoon.

ok..... sorry about this..... the thing is....

If you would have looked you could have wondered.... hummm why doesn't google list the references listed in this patent? Perhaps that is a long shot for you. You wouldn't be able to find that.

You could look up what references are made.

There you have Gary, Mortimer etc you know Gary, why didn't you know the toy?

Then can for example look what other patents make those same references.

Say 830801

Then find things like this
http://www.google.com/patents?id=rnxQAAAAEBAJ


can say boo boo bla bla again but it's an interesting device. Not free energy but it starting to look like a flux gate system the way Mr Flynn illustrates. And it leads to an infinite number of other interesting devices. It's like a forest of motor concepts. No one really looked at any of them because thoughts the quality worth getting patents on are just not worth even so much as looking at? Yes?

The dog works just like your Nazi speaker. That was the real joke for me. But I need you wise old man to cooperate. I can not fight the dragon on my own and prove he exists to you. That would be silly. I'm going to turn you free energy atheist into a true believer. hahaha!! Free energy can save you Hans. Trust me, have faith Hans. Put your hands on the screen.  Lets do this crusade thing here.

How do you like my video? I know it's not much jet... But don't forget to laugh about my website ok? You know what I mean.

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/?wmf=perpetual-motion.wmv

[gaby de wilde]

I agree that it can be very interesting looking at patents like these, though what I find interesting is that all these devices fail to work in different, complicated and very interesting ways.

One of my favorite devices that failed to work in a very interesting way is this one:

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm#buoy3

Yes, this isn't an uninteresting device.



It wouldn't tip over but the weight would sink straight down.

Alchemist Cornelius Drebbel build a clock powered by atmospheric pressure changes.
This is a cool page
http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi574.htm
with mp3
http://www.kuhf.org/programaudio/engines/eng574_64k.m3u

Here is a page about his perpetual mobile. Or at least thats what they called it in those days. yes,yes,that was the meaning in those days. :-)

http://santa-coloma.net/drebbel/drebbel.html


I also attached some of that timeless art work of mine

[gaby de wilde]

....

[gaby de wilde]

@ Gaby,

I am aware of the different drives using similar ideas that have been patented. Like the dozens of magnet motors and perpetual motion machines that have also been patented THEY DON'T WORK !

http://www.padrak.com/agn/AGPAPER99.html
I now remind each reader that all of the patents submitted to the US Patent Office go through a formal review process, and each patent is reviewed by a board of military representatives from the various branches of the US Military. If any patent becomes of interest to ANY of these representatives, then that patent is pulled from the patent approval process, the patent is taken over by the US Government, the inventors are notified that - that information has become classified in the interests of US national security, and that all of the information regarding this patent is to be boxed up and sent in to the appropriate government office. Also, there are federal rules, financial penalties, and also stiff jail sentences for anyone that refuses to cooperate or discloses any of this "classified information" after receipt of the letter.

You do not believe me? It's called: U.S. Secrecy Order (Title 35, United States Code (1952), Sections 181-188). I know people that have had the "pleasure" of getting such a letter ("...under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186."). They can tell you about it!

This U.S. Secrecy Order is on the internet for your reading pleasure at:

The rest of that page is worth reading but lets skip a bit..

http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE13.html
SECRECY ORDER
(Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188)

NOTICE: To the applicant above named, his heirs, and any and all of his assignees, attorneys and agents, hereinafter designated principals:

You are hereby notified that your application as above identified has been found to contain subject matter, the unauthorized disclosure of which might be detrimental to the national security, and you are ordered in nowise to publish or disclose the invention or any material information with respect thereto, including hitherto unpublished details of the subject matter of said application, in any way to any person not cognizant of the invention prior to the date of the order, including any employee of the principals, but to keep the same secret except by written consent first obtained of the Commissioner of Patents, under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186.

Any other application already filed or hereafter filed which contains any significant part of the subject matter of the above identified application falls within the scope of this order. If such other application does not stand under a security order, it and the common subject matter should be brought to the attention of the Security Group, Licensing and Review, Patent Office.

If, prior to the issuance of the secrecy order, any significant part of the subject matter has been revealed to any person, the principals shall promptly inform such person of the secrecy order and the penalties for improper disclosure. However, if such part of the subject matter was disclosed to any person in a foreign country or foreign national in the U.S., the principals shall not inform such person of the secrecy order, but instead shall promptly furnish to the Commissioner of Patents the following information to the extent not already furnished: date of disclosure; name and address of the disclosee; identification of such part; and any authorization by a U.S. government agency to export such part. If the subject matter is included in any foreign patent application, or patent, this should be identified. The principals shall comply with any related instructions of the Commissioner.

This order should not be construed in any way to mean that the Government has adopted or contemplates adoption of the alleged invention disclosed in this application; nor is it any indication of the value of such invention. etc etc

Here are some titles of bookies that you can purchase but can stuff into the search engine also:

Ackerman, John, TO CATCH A FLYING STAR, Univelt Publishing, San Diego, Ca. 1989.

Cramp, Leonard, UFO'S AND ANTI-GRAVITY: PIECE FOR A JIGSAW, Adventures Unlimited Press, Ill. 1966.

Childress, D. H., ANTIGRAVITY HANDBOOK, Adventures Unlimited Press, Ill. 1993.

Childress and Vesco, MAN-MADE UFOS: 1944-1994, 50 years of suppression, Adventures Unlimited Press, Ill. 1994.

Cox, J., SPACE DRIVE HANDBOOK (1972) P. O. Box 655, Marietta, Ga. 30061-655.

Forward, R., INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC, Baen Books Riverdale, N.Y. 1995.

Hill, Paul R., UNCONVENTIONAL FLYING OBJECTS: SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS, Hampton Roads Publishing Charlottesville, VA, 1995.

Kumnel, Peter, ANTIGRAVITY FROM SPINNING MASSES, Stuttgart-Echterdinger 1973.

Deyo, Stan, THE COSMIC CONSPIRACY published by, Adventures Unlimited Press Kempton Ill., 1994.

Mallove, Eugene and Gregory Matloff, THE STAR FLIGHT HANDBOOK: PIONEER'S GUIDE TO INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL, John Wiley and sons, Inc. N.Y. 1989.

Pages, Marcel J., TECHNIQUES OF ANTIGRAVITATION (1974) Paris, Chiron, 1974.

Poliakov, S. M., EXPERIMENTAL GRAVATONICS, Moscow Area, 141120 Friazino, 60-let str, 1-167.

Lt. Plantier, UFO'S AND FIELD PROPULSION

Kaku, Michio, HYPERSPACE-A SCIENTIFIC ODDESSY, Oxford University Press N.Y. 1994.

Pawlicki, T. B., HOW TO BUILD A FLYING SAUCER, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1981.

Thorne, Kip, BLACK HOLES AND TIME WARPS, W. W. Norton and Co. , 1994.

Sigma, Rho, ETHER TECHNOLOGY: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO GRAVITY CONTROL, Tesla Book Co. Milbrae Ca. 1977.

Valone, Tom, ELECTROGRAVITATION SYSTEMS, Integrity Research Institute, Washington D. C., 1995.

Wheeler, GRAVITATION AND INERTIA, Princeton University Press, 1995.

King, Moray B., TAPPING THE ZERO POINT ENERGY, Parraclete Publishing, Prove, UT, 1989.

There are some old men on youtube disclosing antigravity tech. Show us that routine where covering your eyes brings you those absolute truths? I can use a good laugh.

[ltseung888]

Dear Gaby,

You always amaze me with your knowledge of the various over unity and flying saucer information. 

Hans have brought up the interesting ?no battery loudspeaker? to our attention.  If we narrowly treat the input as the electromagnetic wave energy from the radio stations and the output as the energy to drive the loudspeaker, we appear to have a well proven over unity invention.

The important element in the ?no battery loudspeaker? is in the ?no battery?.  Electromagnetic energy from the radio stations seems to be magnified.  The obvious question is ? where does the extra, magnified energy come from?

Some would say that it comes from the magnetism of the permanent magnets.  These permanent magnets would lose their magnetism in giving energy to the loudspeakers.  However experimental evidence indicates that such loudspeakers can work for years. 

Some would say that it comes from zero point energy that has not been generally accepted by the mainstream scientific community.

I wonder which theory out there can explain the phenomenon better than the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory?  I would love to see you apply your theory to this particular situation.