The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Cap-Z-ro]

Very nicely framed Hans.

I as relieved that you stopped short of naming names as it relates to fictional characters - bill seems quite content and that should be respected.

Shouldn't this group be above severely criticizing wacky ideas though ?

I mean, no one on this site could ever be harmed or taken advantage of in any way by snake iol sales pitches...if there is even so much as an uncrossed 't' someone here will pick it up every time.

I've seen new members post some topic which the majority consider to be old, tired, or done to death already, and no one replies...no one takes derisive shots at them either...they just don't become involved.

To me, that is how all topics of disinterest or nonsense should be regared.

Regards..

[ltseung888]

G?day all,

Fig. 7   shows the limits of movement.

In position A the iron reed is un-energised. Since iron is attracted to either pole both poles exert equal pull, the forces balance each other out, and the system is in equilibrium.

If we now energize the reed by turning the coil on, it will become an electromagnet with two distinct poles. We can reverse the polarity of the electromagnet by reversing the flow of current through the coil.

Shall we say a forward current polarises the reed with the north pole facing the permanent magnet. Since like poles repel and unlike poles attract the reed is propelled by both poles to the right, up to the strongest point of attraction (point B). There it will come to rest, having found the point of equilibrium of all participating forces.

Reversing polarity will move the reed in the opposite direction and stop at point C.

If we switch the power off at the extreme points the iron reed will just stick there since it is still attracted, albeit with diminished power. That is why the spring is necessary to bring the reed back to the neutral mid point.

In the design of the motor we have to deal with these ?stick points? in some way before we can induce rotation. This we can do with well timed pulses.

Hans used the experimental technique of passing current in the coil to move the iron reed.

Note that in the original design of the "no battery loudspeaker", the current in the coil was from the tiny electromagnetic signal from the radio stations.  That signal is a high base frequency with sound wave frequency superimposed.  The amount of energy (or current induced) is extremely small.

Passing current directly to the coil destroys the original setup.  It is like pushing the pendulum with a strong pull that could swing it circularly many times.  The pulse (Lee-Tseung pull) must be applied at the right time and also with the appropriate magnitude.

[hansvonlieven]

Hans used the experimental technique of passing current in the coil to move the iron reed.

Note that in the original design of the "no battery loudspeaker", the current in the coil was from the tiny electromagnetic signal from the radio stations.  That signal is a high base frequency with sound wave frequency superimposed.  The amount of energy (or current induced) is extremely small.

Passing current directly to the coil destroys the original setup.  It is like pushing the pendulum with a strong pull that could swing it circularly many times.  The pulse (Lee-Tseung pull) must be applied at the right time and also with the appropriate magnitude.

Again you show how little you know about physics Lawrence.

A detector circuit picks up an amplitude modulated wave. The germanium diode acts as a half wave rectifier stripping off half of the signal. The remainder is half a carrier wave that shows the signal as a series of peaks depending on the frequency, quality and amplitude of the acoustic signal. The loudspeaker or headphone is too sluggish to reproduce the carrier wave and therefore the audio signal is all that remains.

The audio signal is RANDOM as far as frequency or amplitude is concerned in technical terms, though musicians would get kind of miffed if you described their work as random noises artfully assembled into a harmonious whole, yet technically this is what it is.

If you were to apply Lee-Tseung Pulls as a signal source all you would hear is the noise of a jackhammer in various frequencies.

You have absolutely no idea how this works or you would not be talking such crap.

Hans von Lieven

[chrisC]

Hans used the experimental technique of passing current in the coil to move the iron reed.

Note that in the original design of the "no battery loudspeaker", the current in the coil was from the tiny electromagnetic signal from the radio stations.  That signal is a high base frequency with sound wave frequency superimposed.  The amount of energy (or current induced) is extremely small.

Passing current directly to the coil destroys the original setup.  It is like pushing the pendulum with a strong pull that could swing it circularly many times.  The pulse (Lee-Tseung pull) must be applied at the right time and also with the appropriate magnitude.

Again you show how little you know about physics Lawrence.

A detector circuit picks up an amplitude modulated wave. The germanium diode acts as a half wave rectifier stripping off half of the signal. The remainder is half a carrier wave that shows the signal as a series of peaks depending on the frequency, quality and amplitude of the acoustic signal. The loudspeaker or headphone is too sluggish to reproduce the carrier wave and therefore the audio signal is all that remains.

The audio signal is RANDOM as far as frequency or amplitude is concerned in technical terms, though musicians would get kind of miffed if you described their work as random noises artfully assembled into a harmonious whole, yet technically this is what it is.

If you were to apply Lee-Tseung Pulls as a signal source all you would hear is the noise of a jackhammer in various frequencies.

You have absolutely no idea how this works or you would not be talking such crap.

Hans von Lieven

So Lawrence, I guessed that's why those farmer professors in China are so thrilled about your wisdom and why there aren't any MIT  or Stanford or Caltech or even Hong Kong Polytechnic professors picking up the phone to call you? Maybe you should list your phone number, just in case?

Or then, maybe Hans is correct, despite your good natured humor, you still are kind of  'short' on real Physics.

cheers
chrisC

[Ben Waballs]

Hans,

Loved your site. Spent hours there. Very insightful. You are right on. Thanks very much.