The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ramset]

Maybe   now   would be a good time to repeat slides 10-12   Chet

[shruggedatlas]

Somehow this is seen as license to bash Mr. Tsung...despite all this ill treatment I see nothing but patience and respectful responses form him.

I do not think his responses are all that respectful.  First of all, he uses multiple personas to try to further his views, which is insulting to everyone.  Second, he constantly takes digs at his readers.  For example:

"Tseung, you made the mistake of assuming that the forum members were similar to the professors and students at Tsinghua or Shenzhen Universities.  The participants at Tsinghua and Shenzhen were pre-screened and were highly qualified."

So basically, instead of engaging his detractors in a point-for-point discussion, he dismisses the arguments en masse as coming from "unqualified" individuals, and therefore not worthy of discussion.

So no, he is not respectful or polite, though he is patient, I will give you that.  I honestly believe he will continue on with this nonsense until his last days, with Wang Shum Ho motor perpetually "being validated by the Chinese government" and a commercial model coming out "by the end of next year".

[ltseung888]

Maybe   now   would be a good time to repeat slides 10-12   Chet

Translation of the presentation of Slide 10 in the dry run.(reply 1826)

Tseung: " In Slide 10, we have a simple pendulum or swing.  There are two forces on this system.  The first one is the weight - 60 units in this case.  The other is the tension of the string (T).  In the stationary state, these two forces must be equal.  This means T is also 60 units."

Pause.

Tseung: "If one can only exert a force of 10 units, one cannot lift the pendulum bob.  However, if one pulls the bob horizontally with the 10 unit force horizontally, the bob will be displaced both horizontally and vertically."

Dear ramset,

Let us discuss slide 10 in its greatest technical detail.  In the presentation at Shenzhen University, the above explanation was accepted by every scientist.

I personally cannot find any hole or any possible fault in this slide.

What is your opinion?  If you absolutely agree, we can then discuss Slide 11.

Waiting for your comments (and other intelligent ones).

[Cap-Z-ro]

"I do not think his responses are all that respectful.  First of all, he uses multiple personas to try to further his views, which is insulting to everyone.  Second, he constantly takes digs at his readers."


- I'm sorry, but I cannot accept any argument based on an unproven premise...you ought to know that...isn't your whole approach to any of the 911 topics also based on the reliance of absolute proof ?

So, unless you can say for certain that the posts to which you refer, were actually written by Mr.Tsung, you cannot rely on them for buttressing in a debate...at least not in any forum that I am aware of.


"I honestly believe he will continue on with this nonsense until his last days, with Wang Shum Ho motor perpetually "being validated by the Chinese government" and a commercial model coming out "by the end of next year". "


- And what if that projected outcome actually turned out to be true - where is the loss - where are the victims ?

I'm sorry I just don't see any upside to bashing the man for stating his theories...whether they are valid or not is not - and as yet no one has come up with any legitimate grounds for taking that approach.

Don't we all have bigger fish to fry here ?

And besides this thread has brightened up the place...in case you haven't noticed.

Who would have known Hans was that funny - he put out some pretty funny stuff - once he saw that Lawrence was no dummy and changed his approach.

Honorable mention goes to Bill, and all the other known and unknown contributers.

I believe you even got a guffaw out of me once.

I'd also like to thank various unnamed members of Writers Guild with an abundance of time on their hands who may or may not have dropped in during the writers strike.



Regards...

[ltseung888]

Maybe   now   would be a good time to repeat slides 10-12   Chet

@Cap-Z-ro,  since ramset is not answering, you can comment on Slide 10.  It appeared that many forum members could not understand the Lee-Tseung theory.  I shall now break it into tiny steps.

Can you understand and agree with slide 10.  Ignore all other posts.  Focus only on slide 10 this time.

It only needs thorough understanding of 3 slides to understand the entire Lee-Tseung theory.  The Physics and Mathematics cannot lie.  The participants at Tsinghua ans Shenzhen University Seminars could follow them.   Why would the forum members here have so much difficulty?