The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Forever]

There are some photos I took from the seminar.

The first one is Professor Hsu (許立æâ€"¹æ•â,,¢Ã¦Å½Ë†).
The second one is Mr. Lee Cheung Kin. (李長建)
The third one is Mr. Tseung.
Two companies are being formed. One in Shenzhen. One in Hong Kong. The website and discussion forum in Hong Kong will be in English. You are welcome to post there.

[Koen1]

Why don't you read our response?

http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/PATENTSCOPE/74/32/bd/0032bd.pdf

If you want the World to get the full picture, show the whole thing. 

Tseung, it really does not matter what letters you sent the patent authority after they had already
decided your patent application is useless.
Besides, do you really think a simple letter from a person who is claiming an effect that
is not acknowledgd by the patent authority, in which is pointed out that the patent authority
is wrong and that the send will now explain the truth in laymens terms to the patent authority,
accompanied with some old patents that were given back when such rigoirous testing
was not yet standard practise, will in any way convince the patent authority?

Compare it to the teacher who has to grade your paper; teacher says well Tseung this is
a nice piece of writing, but what you're saying here goes against everything I know
and I will have to give you an F. Then Tsung tells the teacher "no, I am right, and
you are wrong, and I'll explain it to you in laymens terms". You really expect the
teacher to give you a higher grade?

If you really think your letter will have any effect you are more nutso than I thought.

I shall defer discussion on Slides 10-12 until patents issues are settled.  Otherwise, we shall go back to the same patents a few hundred posts later.

[M@rcel]

Discuss the slides, show the errors. Do not refer to older pages in this topic.

PLEASE!

[Top Gun]

Discuss the slides, show the errors. Do not refer to older pages in this topic.

PLEASE!

I think this is the correct approach.  Focus on the Slides.  When one wants to benefit the World, there will be obstacles to overcome.

In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with Slides 10-12.  Some people who might not have studied the Slides might just say: ?The energy going into the pendulum must be totally from the horizontal pull.  There is no other energy involved.?  However, top physicists who have paid attention to Slides 10-12 will conclude otherwise.

They will lose sleep thinking about these Slides.  The moment they see a working OU device, they will be totally convinced.  Meanwhile, let them lose some sleep.

[ltseung888]

Discuss the slides, show the errors. Do not refer to older pages in this topic.

PLEASE!

I think this is the correct approach.  Focus on the Slides.  When one wants to benefit the World, there will be obstacles to overcome.

In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with Slides 10-12.  Some people who might not have studied the Slides might just say: ?The energy going into the pendulum must be totally from the horizontal pull.  There is no other energy involved.?  However, top physicists who have paid attention to Slides 10-12 will conclude otherwise.

They will lose sleep thinking about these Slides.  The moment they see a working OU device, they will be totally convinced.  Meanwhile, let them lose some sleep.

The horizontal energy in the first Lee-Tseung Pull is the horizontal energy in Slide 12.  This energy is definitely not equal to the vertical energy in Slide 12.

Thus the blind application of the Law of Conservation of Energy - assuming that the energy of the pendulum must be totally supplied by the Pull is incorrect.  Physics and Mathematics cannot lie.