Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance

[citizendc]

What I find interesting is how close 7.8hz is to the Earths Magnetic Field frequency of 7.83hz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonance
I'd bet similar results will occur when using multiples of this frequency such as 7.8Hz, 15.6Hz, 23.4Hz

cheers 

[BEP]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonance
I'd bet similar results will occur when using multiples of this frequency such as 7.8Hz, 15.6Hz, 23.4Hz

cheers 

Read more on that Wiki link. You will see common harmonics (integer multiples) are not going to happen. We measure the EM portion and assume a base frequency of around 7.83. The next frequency up is base x 1.625 (varies with time, location and Sun activity). I think if the Sun wasn't distorting the magneto and Ionoshperes and the Earth perfectly spherical the base would be 6.28 Hz. (2pi)
Also thought, the base is a radiant energy signal(6.28). We just measure the EM portion(7.83). The result may be the seen beat frequency of around 1 Hz. (actually around 1.6 Hz. but also varies slightly).

I believe Marco checked this out and found only 7.8 to be interesting.

I'm glad to see this thread with a hit. I think it was the most important work done on the site. And if folks really understood the results it should be the most important to them.

[triffid]

test,just wanted a link to this thread.triffid

[turbo]

Read more on that Wiki link. You will see common harmonics (integer multiples) are not going to happen. We measure the EM portion and assume a base frequency of around 7.83. The next frequency up is base x 1.625 (varies with time, location and Sun activity). I think if the Sun wasn't distorting the magneto and Ionoshperes and the Earth perfectly spherical the base would be 6.28 Hz. (2pi)
Also thought, the base is a radiant energy signal(6.28). We just measure the EM portion(7.83). The result may be the seen beat frequency of around 1 Hz. (actually around 1.6 Hz. but also varies slightly).

I believe Marco checked this out and found only 7.8 to be interesting.

I'm glad to see this thread with a hit. I think it was the most important work done on the site. And if folks really understood the results it should be the most important to them.

There are two main reasons why higher frequencys show less result.

1. The higher frequency's have less energy to move the magnets.
2. It takes more energy to move the magnets faster.

Due to these two facts i was unable to drive the setup at higher frequencys.
But i still think it's a miracle it did this, and i am looking into other shapes and sizes to rule out mechanical resonance issues.
The best hit would be a solid state setup without moving parts, but it alomost looks like there HAS to move something.

Marco.

[stprue]

@marco

Have you had any further success in your new set up that you were working on???  WHat type of torroid are you using a 1" and with how many winds/bfiliar/guage??  I think the good people here would like to replicate.