Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bob Boyce TPU thread

Started by hartiberlin, July 26, 2007, 12:03:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Grumpy

Too much writing for me to keep up with today, so I'll just get to the point.

When I say "electrostatic" I mean like in the phenomenon of "electrostatic induction" like Tesla used, and he found that the electrostatic inductive effect was (i.e. the amount of current induced) determined by the frequency and the potential - only.  This form of induction was a hot issue back in the late 1800's - fascinating research back then that is scarcly heard of now.

A DC "potential" does not provide "electrons" as there is no current and no drift.  A DC "bias" would provide electrons but a DC "potential" provides a "scalar electrostatic potential" (i.e. a tension or pressure in the ether).  So when you apply a DC potential to the second you are increasing the pressure around/along it.

Might help to look up the history of "displacement current" - how Maxwell came up with it and how it was never detected in his lifetime. 

Bob's choice of wire insulation may be important after all.


It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

eldarion

All,

I separated the grounds of the signal generator and the HV supply as instructed.  This time, no overunity, but my odd pulsing waveform is back and stable.

What I did was I tied the ground of the signal generator and the 12V inverter input ground together, and left them floating.  This unfortunately required me to unplug the CRT monitor, as there is an Earth ground connection inside the monitor that was connecting the FPGA ground to Earth ground.  Hopefully an LCD monitor will not have this connection...

One end of the HV DC potiential (160V) was connected to Earth ground (I chose to ground the "+" end first, but switching which lead was grounded made no difference).  The other end was connected to the secondary winding.  The other end of the secondary winding was connected to a 0.0047uF DC blocking capacitor, and then to a 470-ohm load resistor, then Earth ground  The scope ground was connected to Earth ground, and the other end of the probe went to the nongrounded end of the resistor.

Disconnecting either lead of the HV bias caused the pulsing to stop immediately.  Disconnecting the power to the inverter caused the pulsing to dimish as the HV potential diminished.  Plugging the CRT monitor into the FPGA (thereby connecting both grounds to Earth ground again) caused the pulsing to vanish immediately.

I have attached two small videos of the effect, one at an expanded timebase and one at a smaller timebase.

The settings were:
1x-2x-4x frequency, 50KHz 1x frequency, 0?-121.0?-242.0? phasing, 160V DC HV potential, 499ns pulse width.
Scope was set to 5V / vertical division, 1us / horizontal division in the last video.
All of the non-driven primary coil ends were connected to +13.8V, as open-ended drive did absolutely nothing.
Power draw was about 4.14 watts for everything, including the inverter.

So, my question is, does this pulsing mean that something is trying to work, and if so, how do I force it the rest of the way into full overunity mode? ;D

Eldarion
"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value."
-- Thomas Paine

Grumpy

Bob is the expert, but the educated guess says:

Adjust freq. to try to find a sweet spot.

Decrease pulse width.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

eldarion

Quote from: Grumpy on October 07, 2007, 07:40:12 PM
Bob is the expert, but the educated guess says:

Adjust freq. to try to find a sweet spot.

Decrease pulse width.

Hi Grumpy,

I have already tried that--there was some variation with frequency, but it never came anywhere close to overunity operation.

The pulsing does seem very dependent on the blocking capacitor--substituting a lower impedance capacitor greatly diminished it.

Eldarion
"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value."
-- Thomas Paine

Bob Boyce

The term HV potential is accurate, while the term HV bias only applies if that HV potential is also providing the HV bias to a hydroxy gas cell stack as the water entraining potential.

Eldarion, you have not mentioned what if anything you are reading as outputs from your other longitudinal windings.

Applied pulse width may be set for 500 ns, but what is the actual pulse width at the primary? Have you checked this to see? You may have to increase pulse width or decrease pulse width based on the response time of your drive electronics.

Bob