Molina Martinez patent

[Alberto Molina M.]

@martinzurix,

In a Particle Accelerator like CERN?s, the energy produced by the collision of photons is by very far smaller that the energy needed to produce the collisions. One of the reasons for this is they have to force bunches of photons to travel in a circle against photon?s tendency to travel linearly. To force the photons to a circular trajectory they have to use extremely powerful electric and magnetic fields all along the perimeter of 27 kilometers for as long as necessary to focus and maintain the acceleration of the photons. This process demands a huge amount of energy.

Other reason is that because the concentration of photons is not too high, the number of collisions taking place is not high either. Making the balance, the process is extremely inefficient in terms of energy production. This is why physicists have concluded that the utilization of antimatter as source of energy is totally impractical.


For the Antimatter Electrical Generator the situation is totally different. The generation, concentration and collision of photons take place in a very small Photonic Chamber. There is no need to alter the direction of the photons, to accelerate them, or to focus them in any way. For this reason 99.99% or more of the energy used in Particle Accelerators is not needed here.

Plus, the concentration of photons traveling within the chamber at the speed of light in all directions will be extremely high, for what the number of collisions taking place at some point will be a lot higher than in Particle Accelerators. And the process doesn?t stop there. The collision of photons will continue indefinitely for as long as there is still lasing medium in the chamber, in a process that could last for years or even decades of energy production.

Given the Antimatter Electrical Generator works as intended, the efficiency of the system in terms of energy production will be extremely high.



@HopeForHumanity,

Nice thought. Hard to know by now what happens in there! 



@pauldude,

Thanks for the math! Matter and energy, as you say, are only different forms of the same. So, theoretically, it should be within the limits of physics to transform either one into the other, and that?s exactly what the antimatter generators intend to do.

Best regards,


Alberto Molina M. 

[martinzurix]

HopeForHumanit   

super you thinking similar  like me 

stars is exploders to destroy unusefull matter but black holes is imploders to form back meter from energy...


Alberto Molina M.

looks very promising technology  something very similar to V.Shubergers (me big fan of this gay) implosion theory..

implosion process is were particles move from from outer perimeter to center and form highter states of energy lewel

shuberger say that imploding process is natural type of energy motion... planets are centers were `anti photons` collide and form mater


stars emitting photons they collide and produce explosive anti mater-energy (reason why solar light produces heat.. there are collision of photons with matter) , black holes emitting implosive anti photons   wen anti photons collide they produce stable matter and natural cold...   just theory

sore for my bad english... i hope something is readable from my texts..

[pauldude000]

@Alberto

If I understand correctly, you intend to use a lasing medium, inside of a small spherical totally reflective chamber to initialize the collision effect. May I suggest using lasing dye. (see "Dye Lasers"). Lasing dye is highly efficient, and easily replaceable.

It does not have the drawback of a partial vacuum, as in a rarified gas laser. (Along with its potential unintended X-Ray production.) It is not nearly as expensive as a solid material rods.  It may be stimulated by all the regular manners except electric arc, or direct internal material combustion. (You can use RF stimulation, direct photon stimulation, heat stimulation, etc..)

I am also willing to bet that any "ultra-bright colors" fabric dye would lase quite well...

Paul Andrulis

[MinEth3r]

Hi everyone,

About the Continuous Electrical Generator. *It can be made to work IMHO*
Here's some patent references; patentfetcher.com is free, as pat2pdf.org

       First, do a patent search (gb.espacenet.com) using the applicant field from US2004007932, namely HYUN LAB CO LTD . Did you know about this effort? It's the very same idea as the CEG.
       Second, the black box inverter in the patent app., in order to be efficient, ought to use Selective Harmonic Elimination, aka Magic Sinewaves. IEEE Power Electronics journal contains other worthwhile schemes, such as this bidirectional one! US6914420. Or one can use only windings. But for the experimenter, total control over the waveform ought  to appeal. Those two are very interesting: US20060087295 and US20050174098. SHE as a better PWM should yield more efficiency in the CEG's simple design, perhaps coupled to a couple other drive ideas.
       Third, there's the 1984 Westinghouse patent US4595843 entitled Low Core Loss Rotating Flux Transformer  does indeed tell us that when using amorphous metal near saturation, hysterisis losses are eliminated. The Sullivan patent on Toroidally wound cores US20030025416 is worth a look also, even if it's only for mechanical devices: if the toroid isn't saturated, there's almost no counter-torque! Wonder if it would be applicable to a no-moving part generator?

     A recent website spawned from a recent thread on this forum on the now-classic cap anomaly might interest you also. http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc/ (Reminds me about the Mckie PODMOD, US4146395)
US20060152955 as the textbook example (lots of technicalities about FET Driving left behind) of charge recycling, another one being US20050189927.
US7085123 about how a supercapacitor correctly switched can yield much higher battery lifetime.
US20070002598 is also a great idea to keep one's mosfets cool, cutting the voltage they drive by two, makes lots of sense.
http://newelectromagnetism.com might also interest you, clearest exposition so far on the overlooked longitudinal aspect of EM modeling.

    So I'm sure one can make your Continuous Electrical generator work. Maybe changing the location of the energy extraction coils to put them around the toroid, or maybe as Chung Hyun did, like your second embodiement (?? fig 3-7), with similar coils, only shifted. I'm so sure it's possible! Since there's almost no losses, just giving it a little magnetic push to keep the traveling/rotating magnetic field going while decoupling the extraction part of the device from the generating part? 

Magnetic Shield for health purpose, could maybe even be an active part of another generator? : http://rexresearch.com/wadle/wadle.htm

* * *

As for your anti-matter generator, Mr Molina-Martinez,

    First to understand what anti-matter might really look like: http://glafreniere.com Very solid, independent work, from Quebec, Canada.
He thinks J.W. Keely was a fraud, don't know myself what to think about it, so I just ignore the matter...     although I'm enclined to believe in Keely's accomplishements!

  Next, there's no photons!! http://unquantum.net is a MUST-SEE; Light particles don't exist, thresold-based emissions of spherical wavefronts and continuous absorbtion of radiation! The photon doesn't exist, I repeat, the light grain photon doesn't exist. Please consider this fact.

Also, in albeit the same vein, Ken Shoulders' work on EVOs might interest you.

Would love to see pictures of a prototype antimatter electrical generator, or of you CEGs! =)

All the best,
    MinEth3r

[HopeForHumanity]

Hi everyone,

About the Continuous Electrical Generator. *It can be made to work IMHO*
Here's some patent references; patentfetcher.com is free, as pat2pdf.org

       First, do a patent search (gb.espacenet.com) using the applicant field from US2004007932, namely HYUN LAB CO LTD . Did you know about this effort? It's the very same idea as the CEG.
       Second, the black box inverter in the patent app., in order to be efficient, ought to use Selective Harmonic Elimination, aka Magic Sinewaves. IEEE Power Electronics journal contains other worthwhile schemes, such as this bidirectional one! US6914420. Or one can use only windings. But for the experimenter, total control over the waveform ought  to appeal. Those two are very interesting: US20060087295 and US20050174098. SHE as a better PWM should yield more efficiency in the CEG's simple design, perhaps coupled to a couple other drive ideas.
       Third, there's the 1984 Westinghouse patent US4595843 entitled Low Core Loss Rotating Flux Transformer  does indeed tell us that when using amorphous metal near saturation, hysterisis losses are eliminated. The Sullivan patent on Toroidally wound cores US20030025416 is worth a look also, even if it's only for mechanical devices: if the toroid isn't saturated, there's almost no counter-torque! Wonder if it would be applicable to a no-moving part generator?

     A recent website spawned from a recent thread on this forum on the now-classic cap anomaly might interest you also. http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc/ (Reminds me about the Mckie PODMOD, US4146395)
US20060152955 as the textbook example (lots of technicalities about FET Driving left behind) of charge recycling, another one being US20050189927.
US7085123 about how a supercapacitor correctly switched can yield much higher battery lifetime.
US20070002598 is also a great idea to keep one's mosfets cool, cutting the voltage they drive by two, makes lots of sense.
http://newelectromagnetism.com might also interest you, clearest exposition so far on the overlooked longitudinal aspect of EM modeling.

    So I'm sure one can make your Continuous Electrical generator work. Maybe changing the location of the energy extraction coils to put them around the toroid, or maybe as Chung Hyun did, like your second embodiement (?? fig 3-7), with similar coils, only shifted. I'm so sure it's possible! Since there's almost no losses, just giving it a little magnetic push to keep the traveling/rotating magnetic field going while decoupling the extraction part of the device from the generating part? 

Magnetic Shield for health purpose, could maybe even be an active part of another generator? : http://rexresearch.com/wadle/wadle.htm

* * *

As for your anti-matter generator, Mr Molina-Martinez,

    First to understand what anti-matter might really look like: http://glafreniere.com Very solid, independent work, from Quebec, Canada.
He thinks J.W. Keely was a fraud, don't know myself what to think about it, so I just ignore the matter...     although I'm enclined to believe in Keely's accomplishements!

  Next, there's no photons!! http://unquantum.net is a MUST-SEE; Light particles don't exist, thresold-based emissions of spherical wavefronts and continuous absorbtion of radiation! The photon doesn't exist, I repeat, the light grain photon doesn't exist. Please consider this fact.

Also, in albeit the same vein, Ken Shoulders' work on EVOs might interest you.

Would love to see pictures of a prototype antimatter electrical generator, or of you CEGs! =)

All the best,
    MinEth3r

Actualy, there are photons. Don't believe the crap they talk about to cover there asses when they have contradicting theories. Photons are actualy wave packets, because light does not use a medium. This means that in order to transmit an electromagnetic wave, you must have some sort of medium to travel through, but there is no medium of matter, so photon packets are used to explain the wave-material activity of electromagnetic waves. Yes, the light we detect is a wave, but the medium that the wave travels through is generated by the light itself, that is photons.

it's like this:

|\|\|\|\|\ wave

[   ] photon

[ |\|\|\|\|\ ]  [ |\|\|\|\|\ ]  [ |\|\|\|\|\ ]  [ |\|\|\|\|\ ]

kind of like that, but you know physics, it's mutch more complex mathematicaly.