The return of the Hungarian: FREE ENERGY from Wave-Fields...

[Dog-One]

Surely the radio engineers and technicians developing, installing and testing such systems would have recognized any exponential increased in received signal strength by now if they in fact did occur in a simulcast system?

I was thinking exactly the same thing.  There are enough military applications of phase-array radar systems out there, surely an anomaly of this magnitude would have been noted in the literature someplace.

[pix]

A standing wave in a simple resonator will not generate excess energy as long as the reciprocal action-reaction interaction is not broken in some cleaver way. This is so, because as the amplitude within the resonator increases, the amplitude of the input signal will also have to increase in order to be able to feed more energy into it. Therefore the input power will also have to increase in such a way, that there is no net energy gain.

Then what is the principle of Tesla Magnifying transmitter?
You don't need amplitude of the input signal increase together with standing wave amplitude increasing. I don't see such a thing in Tesla setup.
He even made a small mechanical oscillator that he used on the steel bridge, and put that bridge in resonance, he had to stop that experiment because vibrations of that bridge became too dangerous.
Tesla secondary and "extra" coil are in resonance with primary input. This is A MUST for efficient energy transfer.By his own words: "we need a constant small "push" at the peak of the wave".
Then, a lose coupling between primary and secondary, to allow secondary for natural oscillation ( resonance).
Then, secondary and "extra coil" are just slow wave helical resonators, a physical object that accumulates energy to levels of electric breakdown from the top of such 1/4 wave helical resonator.
Tesla himself namet this phenomena "resonant rise".


In real life we need a real physical objects to play with- transmission line, helical or waveguide And resonance plays an important role for EFFICIENT energy transfer.
I don't negate waves interference in free space. It is obvious. It also lies behind a ball lightning. James Corum, a notable Tesla researcher made such experiment with two tesla coils tuned for a different frequencies.
It is logical, that when you interfere waves in some medium, amplitudes add and increase, or cancels and decrease- depending what waves do you interfere. This you will hear in the high school physics lesson.
Only when you do this mixing with EXACT waves, you may obtain a magnification. Those waves has to be harmonics.
Interference can be "destructive" or " additive"
That is why resonance ( harmony) plays important role, if you want to get magnification result.
If you mix random waves, you will get nothing spectacular.
Watch this animation, what you can get when interfering harmonic modes of base wave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMXlzCX5gio


Cheers,
Pix

[ZL]

Dear Forum Members,

It was with great sadness that I learned about the death of Janos Vajda today. He passed away in 2009.

He was a great scientist and inventor, who has revealed the correct understanding of the energy balance in wave fields.
His name and discovery will be taught in the schools and universities of future generations along with Newton and Tesla.

Last time we had a telephone conversation it was around 2008. After that my FE research activity was neglected for a while, this is why I have not know about this so far. I will get a copy of his document he left behind, and study them carefully.

Zoltan Losonc

[ZL]

Ramset,

"I have asked for a bit of help with the proof read, since we don't want to end up with a recipe for something completely different"

You don't need to worry about ending up with something completely different than the original. My English is good enough to understand if the meaning is different. I will not implement all suggestions for changes blindly, but only those that I consider to be reasonable and significant improvement, while still preserving the original meaning and also the original style of the text.

For example if someone is pointing out grammatical errors in Mr. Vajda's paper, then besides making sure the suggested modifications don't alter the original meaning, I will have to make sure that the original style of writing is also preserved. The original style of the paper is scientific, accurate, elegant, and concise. There are some very long sentences attempting to squeeze as much relevant content into a single sentence as possible, which is not an easy reading even in the original Hungarian text. If I would have to explain the same ideas, I would use several shorter sentences to make it easier to read, but by doing so I would falsify the original style of the book. The content accuracy is my responsibility. What I was requesting is very simple, just read it and if something does not sound correct in English due to grammatical or other linguistic errors, then let me know what that is, and I will check it out how we can fix that.

By the way, every time I re-read the documents, I find some linguistic errors which were not recognized last time. Today I have updated the pages again and fixed some grammatical errors.

The "your inventor" and the "we don't do business" expressions were discussed in private email between you and me. The readers of this forum don't even know the context, then why are you responding to them here on the forum and not in private email? Based on decent etiquette a private communication in a letter or email supposed to be answered in private communication, and not on public forums. Its not that the mentioned two subjects are some kind of secret, but still it is simply weird why you are doing this. If you were in desert, would you pour your drinking water into a sieve that leaks...? Why would I?

[ramset]

 ZL
I suppose I misunderstood your mention of millions in post 44 ,I honestly don't understand how else to take that
Public comment (not private Email ).
Sans my public business comment !,

Apologies for the language barrier misunderstanding ,and exactly the reason I like to speak with a person
Whenever possible ,yes it can be hard to have good boundaries when crossing language barriers ,we don't
Always understand the intent ?

I suppose I did cross wires with the other comment ,although as you point out it was semantics and not
Relevant .

It is not my intention to complicate this anymore or distract from your purpose here .

Apologies for the misunderstanding.

Chet