Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[sebosfato]

Anyway stanley didn't stole only andrija but also stephen horvath tech nology....


Stanley wasn't creating other molecules the way you said, anyway nothing i can say can change your mind even if i came here with what i'm saying and this being the only solution. You have being blinded by so much misinformation and dangerous high voltage and 0 current.

Donate if you can

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=ERQSHHBGWC5P2&lc=GB&item_name=Bring%20power%20to%20the%20people&currency_code=EUR&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donateCC_LG_global%2egif%3aNonHosted

More info
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4617-stanley-meyer-true.html

[dankie]

why are you always asking for $ .

People have No money , I have only 2 orders for my wonderful ocillator , I was expecting hundreds . NOBODY HAS ANY $ , ESPECIALY NOT ENOUGH TO SIMPLY GIVE AWAY . THIS IS NOT 1999

[CrazyEwok]

People would only want to jump on if you can proove your design works and is replicatable... If your design worked and was replicatable you wouldn't need to ask on web forums for investors...
FAIL!!!

[sebosfato]

Until people think they are better than others they won't see the truth...

If you fail it doesn't mean i fail.

[L505]

1. A transformer of some sort to drive piezo bolts going into the center bottom tubes?
2. A gas discharge lamp to consume electrons from the water?
3. Who knows?

Electrons are not consumed by a lamp or a bulb, or a resistor. Electrons are vibrating or moving. When the electrons go into a lightbulb filament they just pass through it, they do not get "burnt" or "convert into heat". They simply slow down their speed.

This is the biggest issue I have with stan meyer. He claimed to be an electronics expert and he doesn't even know that electrons are not consumed in a circuit. At least, in his patents he misleads people into thinking that electrons can be consumed in a light bulb.

Crackpots and quacks on the forums are now going around thinking the electron extraction circuit is all about "consuming electrons" in the light bulb. No such thing occurs in a light bulb. I guess these people think that electrons get consumed and burnt off (like some kind of wood in a fire).

Even if it were the case that electrons were "burnt off", this would be very dangerous and would reduce the mass of our world very very quickly. The earth might become some kind of atomic bomb waiting to explode.

So if stan was not a fraud, then someone better come up with an explanation how electrons are "Extracted", because they sure aren't "burnt off" in a light bulb. Anyone with basic electronics experience should know that electrons are not "burnt off" just because a light is shining bright.