Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

Started by hartiberlin, August 18, 2007, 04:39:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

HeairBear

I did it with three tubes, and two plates with a ground wire to the water bath. Bubbles came from all surfaces but the lower current side seemed not as strong. You get the same effect when you have multiple tube sets wired in series. the tubes on the end of the circuit produce less bubbles. In this case we are using a voltage differential of 24V. 12V on each side. Only the currents are different  for some reason. In Stan's drawing he uses a voltage divider type deal to get the effect with equal power on each side. A bifilar secondary may at least double the voltage.
When I hear of Shoedinger's Cat, I reach for my gun. - Stephen Hawking

onormanns

goodmorning_
you know meyer did not have t. beardens work and visa versa. yet he is thouching upon the very details of giant negentropy. but there seem to me that we are missing something. often it is good to go out of the box and take a overlook.
THINK TANK: are we operating as a closed loop ie killing our dipole incessantly? or can we make an open system, negative resistor types and tesla solutions. we all are trained in classical em and that is our problem we allways look from the 3 space view. we have to figure out how the dipol charges transduce time like longitudinal EM energy. meyer pionted to a direction but i dont intuit he has the final soulution we need much higher COP. of the top-for example adding stresses in the vacumm by magnetism. or what the heck do we know about crystals- stress a crystal with sound it gives out static electricity or EM. vica verca. 
like cold fusion there are no quantum or classical models to explain its behaviour. yet by opening the negentropic portal of 4 space by creating a TIME REVERSAL ZONE, we can explain why. maaaaan if we could have a lab. i feel we need to go into more excotic solution. like in cold fusion the precious metal and beardens TRZ solution, i also want to ad that what actually kick it into that high gear is the palladium rod. temporaly operating as a high spin element. platinum is for example used in acupuncture to heal cancer. once it conect with the salts of the body and with dc current we create small amounts of orme elements into the tissue. its inventor had no idea of why.
now--- the electron need to be transported of the dieletrum, here i am thinking cooper pairing and resonance tuning to - of the top- lets say a platinum coated pipe and salt added to the water. or some sort of temporal semi superconduction operating element. this is where we meet the wall. but i am posetive that until we upgrade our flatland we will allways be operating low COP. give me some years to think about it, am still gasping for the understanding of hypersymetri.
Food for thought

alan

Quote from: HeairBear on July 30, 2008, 06:44:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKmB6-wZSh8

Hey look! he has some orange gunk in his cell! He must not have conditioned it enough. LOL.
Hehe, I've noticed that too, or could it be ..... electrolyte?

Gheller J

Herez a ref from you know who to the above discussions    :o


The followin attachments r frm Stan Meyer's Canadian Patent  1,234,774                         Gh. J.



Fig. 8 is for gas generated with various kinds of water and the Amp loading.


Fig. 12 is about using plates vs concentric tubes vs cluster array        >>>Stephen Meyer Concentric Ring Array is 150% less efficient than Cluster Array Tubular!!


Fig. 13 is about the gap vs generation

onormanns

Quote from: Gheller J on July 31, 2008, 10:53:07 AM
Herez a ref from you know who to the above discussions    :o


The followin attachments r frm Stan Meyer's Canadian Patent  1,234,774                         Gh. J.



Fig. 8 is for gas generated with various kinds of water and the Amp loading.


Fig. 12 is about using plates vs concentric tubes vs cluster array        >>>Stephen Meyer Concentric Ring Array is 150% less efficient than Cluster Array Tubular!!


Fig. 13 is about the gap vs generation

sorry, how do you arrange the cluster arrays tubular?