Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

Started by hartiberlin, August 18, 2007, 04:39:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

LtBolo

@ esaruoho

Is there any chance that you could confirm that the clamp-on current meter seen in certain videos has, and is being used with, a DC/Pulsed DC current scale? While Pulsed DC, as it would be when supplying the pulse generator, will register on an AC meter, it will not produce accurate numbers. There are some meters which can measure DC, but most clamp-ons do not.

Just looking for confirmation that the results that everyone is excited about, are as good as they seem. Sure hope so...

fever16

i need only 2 results from R
1.his current test setup using pure DM(distilled) water.
2.oscilloscope shots from power input side,555 timer output side and after bi-filar coil.
these 2 results will be enough for me to zip my mouth  ;D

ashtweth_nihilisti

LtBolo and fever16 , we have discussed this before, we are here to build and report results, we are not interested in skepticism, Ravi is not available for any requests, so please stop wasting posts and bandwidth, asking for this stuff, if you build this, prove it to your selfs and you can measure it any way you need too.

You have specified a useful skeptic proof way of validating it, we will add this to our test criteria, but please Ravi is currently not in a position at this time to fill these or any future request for various reasons.

Regards
Ash
?If you create your own electricity, heating and water systems, you create your own politics. Maybe that?s what they?re afraid of.? ?? Michael Reynolds
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org
http://www.panaceauniversity.org

http://www.geocities.com/glorybangla/cqtes.htm

fever16

okidoki my mistake.just couldn't control.(ravi bhai rocks)
let just talk abt stan's replication.

LtBolo

That completely misses the point Ash. When you are trying to to determine what is or is not important in a so-called replication, it is important to be able to ask questions to better understand. I am a skeptic from the standpoint of wanting reasonable proof of a result, and in doing so better understanding the critical mechanisms; but I am not a skeptic from the standpoint of not believing this to be possible.

I am not sure who appointed you the keeper of the forum, but you seem to think that you are. Since you clearly are not interested in ferreting out the truth, it is apparent that this forum is of no practical use. I won't waste any more of your time or bandwidth.