Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[professor]

@ Professor:

You just mentioned acetone.  I just ran an experiment with my minivan (Mercury Villager, 198,000 miles) by adding 1 ounce of pure acetone to every 10 gallons of gas.  This was my first try.  During this test, I drove no highway miles, only city, stop and go for business.  Well, I just filled back up and got the results: 19.8 mpg.!!!!  This is way better than the highway mileage on long trips of 17 mpg.  I have no idea what the city mileage was prior to the test but, I would guess about 14 mpg.  I know this is off topic but I wanted to add this because, not only does my engine run quieter, my hesitation problem has gone away as well.  (No one could figure out what caused it)  I am a believer in adding acetone in levels of 1 ounce per 10 gallons.

Bill

@Pirate88179
Have been using 3 oz of Acetone and 3 Oz of Xylene for every 10 U.S. Gal of Gas.
Never measured the economy but I can feel the difference in performance which would translate to a better fuel economy.
But don't forget to add a bit of two cycle Oil ~half an ounce  (High Temp) not for Outboards!
If you can obtain  Bitron Oil  it would be the better choice.
Tried this on both of my vehicles with same results. The VW TDI  being Diesel showed also an improvement using only 1 oz but the Computer did not like it too much resulting  the engine light to indicate a overheated O2 sensor.
If you have aircare in your  the car will pass even with a faulty Catalytic as the burn is so much more complete.
I will continue using that contortion.Not quite like hho but some form of free energy.
professor 

[alan]

Found this link http://www.aardvark.co.nz/stanley_meyer.shtml may upset some people. But it says "water molecules have a resonant frequency of around 22GHz, and only when in vapor form"
Can anybody confirm?

Seems correct, but cant confirm.
This is the resonant freq of the molecules, to get meyers effect, you need the resonant frequency of the electrons' 'timerate' to swing em loose.

[L505]

This is the same as Stanley Meyer Water fuel cell 

This is the same as Nikola Tesla "extra coils" setup 

This is nothing new...

If it is nothing new, then why don't 600 people get it working pretty soon? Instead, we see 1 or 2 people who claim to have it working.. and even those claims are hard to believe since all we have are a bunch of grainy YouTube videos which prove absolutely nothing. Some go as far as even video taping the BUBBLES in their cell - wow, what absolute PROOF that their cell truly is revolutionary. I mean, it produces BUBBLES folks. End of story.

Come on folks, try harder. Can't someone make a remote control miniature sized car before working on a full size dune buggy? It can scale up later. You can even buy miniature gas remote control cars which could be converted to hydrogen if Stanley Meyer's system really works. Get the remote control car working first, since it is easier and less risk.

[supermuble]

Clifford Stone said "Absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence."

He is right.... For gosh sakes people, get yourself together and get this stuff working. Stop testing and start applying! Those with the money and the time need to spend less time developing theories and spend more time putting this stuff on vehicles. I have experimented with motors in every way that I can. I put a computer system on my vehicle and I have since raised the fuel economy. I didn't just read about it, I went and did it! I am not using hydrogen. I don't know how to do it. For those of you who do know how to do it, please get it on a vehicle!

[L505]

Seems correct, but cant confirm.
This is the resonant freq of the molecules, to get meyers effect, you need the resonant frequency of the electrons' 'timerate' to swing em loose.

Funny how there are so many different theories on which resonance really applies. The term resonance is so overloaded and abused that it pretty much means nothing.

From carefully reading Stanley's papers, he claims that resonance has to do with the particles oscillating back and forth.

Quote:
"Oscillation (back and forth movement)" of electrically charged particles by way of voltage deflection is herinafter called "Resonant Action", as illustrated in Figure 1-10"

Straight from the horse's mouth, folks. But then again, there are some who say that this is all a cover up and Stanley was just saying this to fool the reader. If someone was just honest about the whole shabamble, it would be so much easier.

However the diagram in figure 1-10 explains or describes absolutely nothing about "oscillations". It just shows a round chamber called a "resonant cavity", without any oscillations being shown. It just shows the geometric progression, not "oscillations".