Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

Started by hartiberlin, August 18, 2007, 04:39:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Super God

Sorry to change the subject from all the bickering, but...How can we scale this Meyer setup to gas production rates to run a vehicle?  Ideally we wouldn't want to take up alot of space, so should we have more than one pulse generator connected to sections of tubes, or should we just setup more than one cell entirely?  I can't wait to get started on my own cell.
>9000


TheNOP

Quote from: HissyfitNihilism on September 30, 2007, 12:24:09 AM
Read the patent and especially the claims.  Tesla never discusses any DC electromagnets.  The claims specifically talk about lowering the self inductance by raising the effective interwinding capacitance.  These are AC phenomena only and have nothing to do with DC battery-operated electromagnets. 

Count your paper clips.  You are hallucinating.
I know what the claim is.
Mind you, the patent does not state AC, but frequencies.
That can also be pulsed DC.

I see your point about DC battery-operated electromagnets tho.


peter from oz

"grabs popcorn and waits for fireworks"
"l have updated the pdf"

Ok, l'm confussed to put it mildly. As a potential user of this technology l thought l was replicating something that worked, all it needed was "tuning" and we were all working on the same page so to speak. Now two postings from spewing have to date gone totally unnoticed or commented on. l'm starting to believe peoples motives in this is the process not the effing end result. So Stan told porkies, well he was human after all not an effing God, lets get over it. Were do we go from here ? ls it all BS or can l still produce hohoho and run my truck for all the righteous reasons? (shuv it up big business, shuv it up the government, and greed )

What are you saying Spewing? it does work but l need slots in the pipes to let the gas out, need sh1t loads of amps now instead of volts, or both. Ravi and Dave were having a lend of themselves with the big bubbles, (well l spose they did disappear, why?) conditioning is crap? l'm no inventor but l can and want to produce sh1t loads of hohoho that l think l can put to good use, not stuff around trying to make the unworkable work, l'm to bloody old for that.

Runningbar, l presume from your posting that you cant get it to produce as good as Ravi and Dave and from reading you have put a lot into it, sooo what now? more amps, slots? or retire to the lounge chair and watch the sideshow cos it dont work?

Hissyfit, for Cs sake post something that helps instead of snipeing ya prick. l dont pretend to know enough to comment on the tec talk going on here, but it sounds like you might know something that could contribute and possibly get something producing enough gas to do more than fart, or is snipeing your way of getting your jollys, end of story.

Well l spose l've offended everyone now, l'm not sorry if we can move on and answer the ? of if it can produce more than standard electrolosis or whatever you call it, or l'll just go over to the Griffin thread and do it that way, at least l dont need the friggin technology degree to understand it

Regards
Peter (no, l'm not bitter and twisted, just pissed at the possibility of been conned)

dutchy1966

Hi Peter,

First of all  i must say I totally agree with you. I think this whole thread has gone a bit haywire...
I've read spewings document and as far as i can see i totally contradicts the operating principles explained by Stan Meyer.
I think a lot of people put forward their own (unverified) theories at the wrong place.

I am still gonna continue with replicating the demo electrolyser. I have the pulser ready. Just waiting for my acrylic tube to start building the cell. My SS tubes are cut to size and ready to go in. I'm gonna have 6 tubes of 20 centimeters.

regards

Robert