Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Did someone tried to replicate a Hendershot Generator ???

Started by robbyd, August 19, 2007, 10:33:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

robbyd

Did someone tried to replicate a (working or not) Hendershot Generator ???
Or try to understand how this baskedcoil oscillator works ??

see here:

http://www.svensons.com/Energy/hendershot.html
http://www.svensons.com/Energy/hendershot2.html

Robby





Omega_0

I have more respect for the fellow with a single idea who gets there than for the fellow with a thousand ideas who does nothing - Thomas Alva Edison


morpher44

Quote from: Mk1 on August 26, 2009, 04:56:26 PM
@all
I have found this guy working on the hendershot motor.

Yeah. That would be me. Hello.

Here is an interesting observation I made this weekend:

WHY 57 pegs?

Hendershot's coil used 57 pegs that are 1/8 inch diameter.
His coil is 5 15/16 inch in diameter.

So the question I had was WHY 57 pegs?
In attempting to wire up such a coil, 57 to me seems like overkill.
I do, however, entertain the notion that Hendershot selected
57 for a specific reason.

In playing around with the math a bit, and with inspiration from
Hubbard's assertion that Hendershot is using Hubbard's idea,
I've come up with a WAY that 57 pegs could have been selected..

Let
D be coil diameter - 5.9375 inch
d be peg diameter - .125 inch

pegs = round_to_odd( PI * D / (d * phi * phi))

were phi is 1.618 (golden ratio).

By using phi here, Hendershot may have been trying
to create a very specific angle where the wires cross --
one that is a function of PHI.

Hubbard used the golden ratio for his coil ... so
perhaps Hendershot used it as well in this way.
This is PURE speculation on my part ... but it
is interesting that it works out to exactly 57 pegs.