Universons

[tinu]

Here is the patent (BREVET D?INVENTION, ?DISPOSITIF PROPULSEUR PAR ACCELERATION DE PARTICULES ET APPLICATIONS DUDIT DISPOSITIF?) granted to Mr. Claude Poher.

Great paper, enjoy it!

If anyone has the English version, please post it.

Tx,
Tinu

[gyulasun]

Hi All,

Probably this patent will be in English language but we have to wait till it is fully available at EPO:
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=WO2007093699&F=0
DEVICE FOR PROPELLING PARTICLES BY MEANS OF ACCELERATION AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
Publication Date: 2007-08-23 !

Gyula

[Omega_0]

This sounds interesting. However the site is very inconvenient. I could not open the PDFs even after putting in the password.
The site allows access without checking the email, you can fill in anything and whats the point of password protecting the pdfs when you are giving away the password?
The video shows something moving with a jerk and some dust for a split second, nothing very special, but he says that he will put up a video of that thing flying very soon. So lets hope.

[wattsup]

@energielibre

Comment ca vas? Je r?side proche de Montr?al.

Could not help but notice your avatar of one of Daniel Pomerleau's circuits.
There is a thread here on his work. I also put up two posts aftrer seeing his demonstrations. Just mind boggling.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,393.msg27270.html#msg27270

I was talking to an engineer on the Jesse McQueen's Power Generator thread and discussing about the source of universal energy and I mentioned to him about this thread and the inventor.

I read most all of the Claude Poher's site, all that is accessible.

I would like to make one recommendation whenever such type of patents are being introduced, formulated and presented to the general public is that the information web site should have a section that can provide more simplified explanations. I am afraid that given the higher complexity and the inventors desire to show his knowledge level, which is impressive to say the least, he will loose interest from the majority if it is not vulgarized to a lower level.

He can have a section for the scientific and academic community but he should put another section for the regular public, regular inventors that can use his findings. Plus, I am sure alot of the scientific and academic community would prefer this also, although they would not say it out load.

We really want to understand this.

Being smart is helping others become smart from their level onwards. You should not expect people to just jump to the level of the inventors expertise and continue from there. The inventor has to come down to our level and push us up. That's the way knowledge transmission will work otherwise people will just become discouraged and lose interest.

Something like "Universons for Dummies".

All the best.

wattsup

[13thHouR]

  Universon's.

Why is this all locked down so much?

I hate to say it, but Quite simply because the arguments do not stand up. It's nothing more than yet more quantum field conjecture.

Which would be OK, if quantum field theory was correct in the first place. However if you put any quantum physicist on the spot they will be forced to admit that quantum physics has more in common with philosophy than verifiable science.

For those who want to expand their knowledge of quantum field theory, then feel free to read the universon site, but if you are looking for something that is practical in the real world of energy production.

Then look elsewhere.


Although... the invention is interesting.

A high density target material, used to shift particle by non subluminal means. Classical physics calls it Quantum Tunnelling.

Proven by Prof.Dr Gunter Nimtz a number of years ago when transfered Mozart 40 by encoding it (smoothing the quantum wave packets) created when he fired photons through a target, and transmitted this from a Point A to point B by non subluminal means.

You will notice his scope readings in his experiments are that of the Kick and scalar (soliton) waves observed in the TPU experiments.

If he lost the Universons junk, then he has some promising research relating to density shift of matter, by holding onto yet another version of quantum field theory he is making himself to appear to be as much of a time waster as those spending years working on Superstringtheory.

If you want to understand density shift of matter, have a read of this. http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2816.0.html

It explains the same thing and more, in plain English (where possible) and does not require you to re-write the laws of physics to achieve the same results.

I am not saying he is wrong in the finite range he limits himself too, but their is no need to be so long winded, double talking and secretive about it all.