Jesse McQueen's Power Generator

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Jesse,

Thanks,  works now.

Hans von Lieven

[Vista Is Dead]

Jesse,

I'm with Hans. 

When I saw the patent quite awhile ago, I just moved on (FYI: I am the EE type). 

If it was issued in 2006 why is no one selling this unit or where is the prototype?

Maybe tell us what we are missing so we can believe?

Guess we have to wait for a prototype/product (not patent) that WORKS. 

Best of luck.

Also are you MAC or Mc Queen?  Are you here seeking help with your idea? 

Hi.  I would just like to point out for everyone who does not know....  Free Energy is controlled.  By the Governments and Oil Companies and of course the string pulling Bank (Federal Reserve) who support and profit from both.  They do not profit from your independance.  Free Energy gives you a control.  A control which also supports great changes.  Great changes are not what our 'World Powers' want.   They need as much control of our energy supply as possible.

Free Energy has been here for thousands of years... Economic and more powerful engines have been developed to run on water....  1986 was my first encounter with such a vehicle.  21 YEARS AGO!!!!?    But nowadays, these Ideas are bought and suppressed.  Pattents plans are altered or just hidden from view. The best of these technologies are guarded.  Free Power Inventers who don't sell their ideas, are ridiculed, or have 'accidents'.    I have seen an incredibly powerful electric motor with low input and incredibly high power output, (Up to 85 HP) which I intended to use in my car as a complete replacement of my petrol engine. The company disapeared shortly after inventing it....


WHY DO WE NOT HAVE A WATER/ELECTRIC RUNNING CAR IN 2007?

Because of MONEY, and those who print it.

[EMdevices]

Interesting discussion Guys,

Here's my comment and I'll make more after I read the patent.

@ Vista is Dead
The biggest roadblock to free energy isÃ, Ã,  REALITY, the way things work in nature and our limited understanding.

@ all
We've tried for ages to get at it, but have you ever thought thatÃ,  CONSERVATION OF ENERGY is a blessing in disquise?

In a closed system you will do ok with a limited amount of energy, assuming you can convert it from all forms to all other forms.

You turn on a lightbulb in a room, and the light hits the walls and gets absorbed and turns into heat.Ã,  You take that heat and turn it back into electricity and power the bulb once again.

Another example is moving from point A to B and back to A.Ã, Ã,  You invest some energy into kinetic energy, supply enough along the way to overcome friction which turns into heat, and recover the heat and cycle it till you reach the destination at which point you recover your kinetic energy back.Ã, Ã,  So you don't have to waste any energy in transportation, when you return to your starting point.

Just two simple IDEALISTIC examples to illustrate the point.

However, can you spot the weak link?Ã,  Ã, Ã,  That's right, converting from ambient heat to electricity.Ã, Ã,  Ambient heat or temperature is a sink with lots of energy but we don't know how to get to it with efficient methods (we use difference of temperature to do it and the maximum theoretical efficiency is the Carnot cycle)

But there is lots of energy around, if that can be a confort to you.Ã,  Ã,  LOLÃ, 

Anyway, I'll take a look at this patent and see what it is.

EM

[hansvonlieven]

G'day EM and all,

In a closed system you will do ok with a limited amount of energy, assuming you can convert it from all forms to all other forms.

You turn on a lightbulb in a room, and the light hits the walls and gets absorbed and turns into heat.  You take that heat and turn it back into electricity and power the bulb once again.

Another example is moving from point A to B and back to A.   You invest some energy into kinetic energy, supply enough along the way to overcome friction which turns into heat, and recover the heat and cycle it till you reach the destination at which point you recover your kinetic energy back.   So you don't have to waste any energy in transportation, when you return to your starting point.

Just two simple IDEALISTIC examples to illustrate the point.

Even if you could manage that, what is the point. There is NO GAIN.]

You are correct in saying there is heaps of energy lying around out there, The trouble is getting to it. So far resonance seems to be the only avenue that looks promising from a standard physics point of view.

Unless, of course you believe in "Lead out Theory", in which case the Chinese are getting ready to pounce on us when they see fit. According to Lawrence Tseung that is. They have had that technology since 1996 and that is why they are spending billions of dollars on conventional power systems from the West.  :-)

Hans von Lieven

[EMdevices]

I had a look at the patent Hans, and I have to agree with you.Ã,  What's going on?Ã,  Ã,  I guess the patent office is hopeing to make an easy buck these days, change of strategy perhaps?  Bring on the nonsense, we'll give you a $2000 picture to put up on the wall and feel proud !!!Ã,   LOLÃ,  :DÃ,  

Anyway, I wonder if Jesse uses the 5:1 transmisson because he thinks it multiplies POWER.Ã,   Sorry bud, not the way nature operates.

Speaking of resonance,Ã,  I have high hopes for it,Ã,  it could be the vehicle that will help us get at that ambient energy.

EM