MRA -Magnetic Resonance Amplifier

[Koen1]

Yeah well, if someone rocks up making OU claims
but does not want to follow through and actually show
convincing results, nor does he want to hear anything
other than people telling him how great he is,
and then declares the thread "closed",
you gotta wonder how real his OU was...

I thought the point of the LEDs seeming to light up
continually but possibly just flashing faster than for
example 100 times per second so our human eyes
don't see that they're not really burning continually
was a fairly good point...
There's a huge difference between 100 pulses per second
and constant direct current.

But hey, if he doesn't want to show how Puthoff is wrong
in his opinion and doesn't even want to hear about Puthoffs
analysis, and he doesn't want to discuss things either,
then perhaps it's not so bad that he's decided to leave...
If he really only came here to shout "lookit" and not
really talk about it beyond that, then he's done what he
came here to do.

[gauschor]

Hello all. I know this is an old topic, but I was considering to build this device, since I think that its principles may apply to the function of the Thestatika.
After reading all these collected letters from rexresearch however I am not sure anymore, if it is worth the time. I mean, there were about 500 posts interesting posts talking of measurements and OU, and in the end there was 1 single letter by the institute claiming: "all is bullshit, the device is only 49% efficient".

After this last letter, I have found not any further information regarding this device anymore...

So, does anyone of you know how the status is and if it is worth to investigate in this subject - or ist it really 100% proven that this device delivers only 50% energy?

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Better email me we are winding a better version ATM

http://yfrog.com/5cmraj

I dont post here any more

Ash

[gauschor]

Yes, I've read in the few pages, that you are not posting here anymore (I think because of all the negative comments). The negative comments however were only based on 1 letter which claims to have disproven the device. I am not convinced by this single letter though. It's not that an "Institute" does everything and always correct (after what I have experienced ridiculous things at university).

Still I would appreciate it if we could work on this as open as possible. I think that's what the forum is here for and it's also easier to exchange information in here than using emails. The more people involved actually doing something the better will be the optimizations. I am not afraid of the negative comments coming from all the chair scientists, in contrary, comparing to on what most people talk about in this forum (e.g. 500 pages about a Joule Thief...) at least there would be enough space for this specific topic

If it is a special newsgroup/emailgroup that requires registration, it's ok to email only. Last time however, someone private messaged me in order to tell me some "secret hints" (other topic though), which in the end turned as something, I already knew, so I'm a little bit skeptic about working "behind the curtain" and would rather keep it public.

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

We discuss the MRA PUBLICLY at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EVGRAY/
minus all THE DISTRACTIONS.