Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

[jjbeamish]

?They? also ?Knew? heaver then air machine could not fly. You should use the proper term instead of ?we?. Because some of us do not ?Know? it can not work. ?you? can think it does not work. That does not mean it can?t.

[Pirate88179]

I don't think shruggedatlas was saying what you think she was saying. I believe she was commenting on this specific design and approach and saying it won't work, as have all of the other attempts by many, including me.  This is far different from saying that no one will ever succeed at any working design. (Just not this one)

She can speak for herself but I took it as a commentary on this specific approach.  Just my 2.00001 cents.

Bill

[linda933]

From the Lawrence Tseung thread...regarding Charles Campbell and new reports by Patrick Kelly of Ashtweth's Panacea University...

Participating in the AERO competition

I have discussion with Mr. Tseung on possibly participating in the AERO competition. The products that are already supported by the Chinese government (Wang, Liang, Tsing Hua, Chao etc.) will need government approval.

from Patrick Kelly
The ready-made product is the Chas Campbell electricity magnifier.   Just a brief note
to let you know that in the last two or three days, Chas has confirmed the excess energy in his system by letting it get up to speed and then disconnecting the motor from the mains and plugging it into the output generator, making it self-powered.

He says that the speed maintains perfectly well and he has put a 75-watt lamp on it as an extra load.  This is COP = infinity as the user's input power is zero while the output power is either 75 watts or 825 watts depending on how you view it.

We may be able to work with Chas Campbell, Gaby, Ash, Kelly and others to produce a prototype that can meet the requirement of the AERO competition.

It should be fun! US$ 200K plus USD $5million for the next two years is incentive enough for me.
 
Forever Yuen

Interesting that $5,200,000 US isn't enough to get Patrick Kelly, Ashtweth, Gaby and Charles to even respond to your suggestion!  Could it be that the "news" of Charles Campbell now having a self-running machine that produces excess power is another big fat delusion? 

If there were any substance to this third-hand report, one might think it would raise a response or two!  Where is the excitement?  The hoopla?  Better yet...where are the corroborating reports and videos? 

This sounds like a good time for Mark Dansie to visit Charles and check it out, maybe.  Or has everyone lost all belief in the non-credible claims and fourth-party reports of this motley crew?

Linda

[markdansie]

Stll witing for the invite ...so how is it going Ash?

[i_ron]

@mscoffman

Thank you also for your kind information and also welcome to the overunity.com forum.

As you can tell, we are a bunch of die-hards, often stubborn and mostly enthusiastic in the endeavors for free energy systems.

Wattsup,

Good to see this little diversion, it raises a number of points that are related. First, as you are
probably aware, Harold Aspden considers the flywheel to be an Aether device, from his experiment
where the the flywheel takes less energy to spin up the second time (if done within a few minutes)

Second, the HV coil in itself is a more efficient generating coil than a HC coil. If you remember I
demonstrated this in one of my earlier tests on this list where discounting the total drive watts the
additional energy required was less than the output from the HV coil. (126% HV efficient?)

Keep in mind though that the shorted HV coil is not comparable to the shorted HC coil. The current
flow through the HV coil is severely restricted by the coils already high resistance,  so additional
load such as light bulbs will not be necessarily be indicative or productive.

Ron