Non RV generators coupled to the RV prime mover

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Please post all here.

A Fisher and Paykel Smartdrive motor out of a junked washing machine makes an excellent
415V AC generator to couple to the RV for producing up to 1.5KW of power. I can also be stepped down to produce 240V or 110V.

http://www.sustainability.ofm.uwa.edu.au/__data/page/83884/FP.pdf

Instruction on how to modify the wiring is there.

Also here: http://www.randysworkshop.com/

[oouthere]

  Hi Ash,

  Has anyone in the RV community managed an over unity set-up using this?

  Rich

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Hi Rich,

No sorry, no one has tested these yet, i have three here and am ATM looking at getting them re enforced for the RV, Hector has an idea to put them where the fan went as a loop whilst Freq driving a generator.

As far as RV OU goes, the most creditable source and report we have is the Neon switcher done by an open sourced engineer in France, (this can still add to that system to produce power) He has reported it being able to charge a secondary battery with no reflection to the battery driving it, (self running).

The Neon switcher has been posted a few times and is an easy circuit to replicate which clips the peak sine waves off the resonance. Still you need a suitable generator to produce power even if getting that circuit done.

I find this to be the cheapest PM Gen to use ATM.

[Humbugger]

"As far as RV OU goes, the most creditable source and report we have is the Neon switcher done by an open sourced engineer in France, (this can still add to that system to produce power) He has reported it being able to charge a secondary battery with no reflection to the battery driving it, (self running)." ~ Ashtweth

@Anyone

Anyone know of any report with actual data and numbers and measurements and test methods on this report of overunity?  I looked at the one reference Ashtweth gave but found no real "report" that said anything more than the claim itself as he states it above.  The clear implication "(self-running)" says to me that the rate of charge on the one battery would need to be greater than the discharge rate of battery running the RV.  So I wonder if the loop was actually closed and it actually self ran?

It seems like there should be something somewhere that talks about how much free energy was delivered to the battery and at what rate and how it was shown that there was no reflection to the other battery.  It sounds like Ashtweth is telling us that this person was getting free mechanical torque and also producing a net positive electrical energy from a self-running machine.  That it would not only self-run but would forever charge batteries that were swapped around.

Is Ashtweth the only information source on this incredible claim and is the statement of the claim itself the totality of the report?  Anyone have anything from any other source on this matter?  Maybe something directly from the fellow making the claims?  I'm really very curious.

I can't ask Ashtweth directly because he won't speak to me or acknowledge me but it seems like this is an important claim and it should be explained in more detail with some data and all that.  Anybody else have info or agree we need this clarified better as a claim?

Humb

[NerzhDishual]

@Hamburger, humblebee, Humbugger

I'm a vegetarian.
So, I do not waste my time posting in some 'meat-eating' forum. They, of course, do what they want.

My question is: What the f' heck are you bl..dy doing here?
Do you think the 'OU' supporters are so stupid?

Best?