Circuit setups for pulse motors

[tropes]

Thanks for the reply. Where are you now in your R&D? Do you have some videos or circuit diagrams to share?
As previously stated, my goal is to build a multi-piston Sotropa Motor  http://www.theowlnest.com/opm.html   Each pair of pistons is attracted and as they reach the core of the coil, just enough current is sent to the coil to block the attraction so that the next pair is attracted to its core. The voltage created by the attraction of these magnetic pistons is directed to a capacitor.
Sounds simple enough.
Tropes

[hoptoad]

Thanks for the reply. Where are you now in your R&D? Do you have some videos or circuit diagrams to share?
As previously stated, my goal is to build a multi-piston Sotropa Motor  http://www.theowlnest.com/opm.html   Each pair of pistons is attracted and as they reach the core of the coil, just enough current is sent to the coil to block the attraction so that the next pair is attracted to its core. The voltage created by the attraction of these magnetic pistons is directed to a capacitor.
Sounds simple enough.
Tropes

Hi tropes. I pretty much abandoned R & D in 2001 but have kept up an active interest in the work of others ever since. I don't personally have any videos I can post, but as I have indicated I will soon try to get toghether some info regarding switching circuits and coils designs for posting in the not too distant future.

Cheers for now - gotta get back to earning a living! 

[Nastrand2000]

Hoptoad,
Sorry if this sounds.....mmm...rude. But I don't buy the story. RF interference can be nullified with a simple faraday cage and the noxious gases quelled with a catalytic process. I'm sure microwaves would give off a tremendous amount of RF interference if they were not properly shielded. Maybe it's just me, if I found overunity,  I would most certainly follow through with my discoveries. This sort of process would most certainly rewrite physics as we know it, if it can be proven. I'm very skeptical of overunity, however I in endeavor to find it one day through a purely scientific manner. This means that it will be easily reproducible. If you have any information concerning circuitry saving tactics, they are more then welcome. I myself have no problem with my circuits, but others here could use some knowledge other then mine to give a different perspective. It's always good to have a different view point or a different explanation of how you think things may be working.
Jason

[hoptoad]

Hoptoad,
Sorry if this sounds.....mmm...rude. But I don't buy the story. RF interference can be nullified with a simple faraday cage and the noxious gases quelled with a catalytic process. I'm sure microwaves would give off a tremendous amount of RF interference if they were not properly shielded. Maybe it's just me, if I found overunity,  I would most certainly follow through with my discoveries. This sort of process would most certainly rewrite physics as we know it, if it can be proven. I'm very skeptical of overunity, however I in endeavor to find it one day through a purely scientific manner. This means that it will be easily reproducible. If you have any information concerning circuitry saving tactics, they are more then welcome. I myself have no problem with my circuits, but others here could use some knowledge other then mine to give a different perspective. It's always good to have a different view point or a different explanation of how you think things may be working.
Jason

Yes you are correct that a Faraday cage will inhibit RF emissions to within the cage, but surrounding the apparatus with a cage makes it innaccessible to moving things around to change things, e.g. dwell angle of the points, duty cycle adjustments, add extra measuring devices, change coil distances etc, in real time while the machine is running. You have to essentially stop everything while you make your adjustments, then restart it again. I'm not a chemist and certainly didn't/don't have access to calalytic conversion processes or techniques. Especially when I lived 400 km from the nearest civilised outlet and worked on a shoe string budget. I'm also not interested in processes capable of producing as much negative impact as they might solve. Also, this form of apparent OU is not necessarily a physics mystery. As mentioned, I theorise (and it is only theory) that the feeble amount of additional energy was from atmospheric ignition. A bit like lighting a small match (a small amount of frictional energy expended to ignite the phosphorus) to light a piece of paper or another couple of matches with the flame it produces.
Buy it or not, it really doesn't matter to me. I'm not interested in financial gain or academic kudos for my own work, but I am interested in contributing one way or another to "more efficient" energy production. I have been close to death 3 times in last 7 years of my life, and I'm far more interested in living the rest of it happily. As my own mother used to say, "when it comes to arguing, would you rather be right, or would you rather be happy".

For the record, I also am extremely skeptical of overunity in terms of energy coming from unknown and inexplicable sources.
And as also I've mentioned before in another thread, "I am an active skeptic".
Cheers from hoptoad. - and keep questioning - it shows you are thinking!

[Nastrand2000]

You could simply put up tinfoil on the walls of the room that the motor is in, that would stop RF. The noxious fumes could easily be vented, and I'm sure that one motor is not going to hurt the environment (atleast for testing purposes). This is why I don't buy the story. You don't break 100 year old  theories and then walk away and say it was better (for the environment)  that we quit, thats preposterous.
Jason