Steve Marks Patent #06015476

[wattsup]

@simonmag

You catch on quickly. Nice design. Everready should be proud.


@HopeForHumanity

In the videos, it is said that the 17 inch TPU weighs 4 kilograms or just under 10 pounds. That's impossible if this also includes the two wooden bases. So if the weight of only the TPU itself with its center circuit weighs 10 pounds, then the weight of the wooden bases is considered not important and has not been revealed by SM. Why? Because it is not part of the TPU per say, so it does not require attention, or so he would have you think.

There was a towel placed under the TPU to aid it in sliding forwards and backwards when they were trying to move it. No one would notice if the whole TPU weighed 10 pounds or 25 pounds.

At 34 grams per 9 volts battery, 206 batteries would weigh 7004 grams or 14 pounds.

This would explain why he had to put a cloth under the TPU to move it otherwise the weight would be too much to move over the table top surface. And this would have tipped others to the whole systems actual weight, thus giving away the trick.

The illusion of a smooth forward/backward movement was that it seemed to float effortlessly, and gives more influence to their gyroscopic claims, which were probably and simply a vibration from creating a Tesla current cutting technique in the rings. I'll be posting a new diagram for how the rings are made on the Control Inside thread, during the weekend.

Now I'm not saying there were 206 batteries exactly. Who cares how many. There could have been 103 and granted, SM could have managed to develop a rudimentary power multiplication system, but he never figured out how to loop these two different DC sources. One source of DC from the batteries to run his transistors and capacitor discharges and the other from "spiking a wire with current and stopping it before it can reach the end of the wire". Tesla Style. Sparks would shoot out perpendicular from the horizontal rings and into each vertical collector wire turn.

The Tesla technique was SM's first explanation and I think the only one that was ever based on fact. After that revelation SM got spanked for talking too much and since then he has been feeding us total bullshit to set us away from the actual simplicity of his device as a current multiplier. He only started talking about frequencies when others here suggested such a technique. He than came back and started talking about his stereo system, etc. Probably wanting to push guys here into this unknown territory while leaving the Tesla technique behind. I think it's time to go back to the basics.

series = increased voltage
parallel = increased amperage

He was producing 850 volts at about 1 amp so his system was in most likely series.

The more you analyse the reality of this device, the way he is showing it, the way he is not showing other facets or hiding them, the more you can smell a rat. Otherwise, please provide me with an acceptable explanation as to why the center platform is considerably higher then the second outer platform itself. It is very hard to notice when looking at a black video.

Another big mistake.

When viewing the U.E.C. video starting 6:25 where he demonstrates the 17"er, when he does a start up.

At 6:55 he flicks the left power switch and says "I'll turn on the primary frequency". He then flicks the other switch to the right of the first one and says "And now the secondary frequency. THE UNIT IS NOW IN OPERATION!!!!!!!".

Big mistake in procedure. He never used a magnet to start the TPU as he did in all his other demos. So where did the power come from when he turned on those switches? Big mistake indeed since he knew the magnet thing was another distraction to the obvious. It even distracted him in this demo.

Look, I'm not totally bent on realizing this is a fraud. I would like to see this thing work and that is why I am doing other posts on the Control Inside thread. Let's look at both sides of the medal to get all the answers. We owe it to ourselves and more to all the guys here that are doing great work, but may be basing it on fiction, whereas I feel all their advancements in testing here is based on their own works, creations, etc.

[pauldude000]

Concerning batteries:

Watts brought up an interesting point, which should be considered. Could it have been 9v batteries?

Let us examine whether this is possible. Watts stated 850volts at 1 amp.  Not considering the fact that that high voltage would cause internal rupture/damage within said batteries which not one manufacturer has designed for such over-voltage connections, we will just examine the realities, discover how many batteries are necessary.

95 9v batteries will produce 855 volts, if connected in series. However, the output current is only around 500 mAH per battery for the expensive ones, or 250 mAH for the cheap ones. To derive a 1 amp load, 2 parallel sets of 95 batteries hooked in series (290 batteries) would be necessary using EXPENSIVE batteries, or 4 sets (580 batteries) of the cheap ones.

For each set of 95 batteries, since the size of 9v batteries is standardized, a given volume of space is determinable. allowing an extra 1/8 of an inch for the connector, the size of a connected battery would require 2" X 1" X 11/16 (.6875)" of space per battery. this yeilds a volume of 1.375 cubic inches per battery, or 130.625 cubic inches per set of 95, or 261.25 cubic inches necessary for the number of batteries necessary for the number of batteries requires to sustain the load demonstrated in the videos, IF USING EXPENSIVE BATTERIES. 522.5 cubic inches for the cheaper ones.

Using the expensive batteries, you are talking about a 16" x 16" X 1" volume (or 8" X 8" X 4"),  using cheap batteries, you are talking 2" thick. This is assuming you are able to leave NO gaps or spaces whatsoever, AND that your space is rectangular.

If any noticeable size differences were apparent, either in person let alone in video, such would have been noted by an examining engineer........ (they expected a fraud anyway, so would have been LOOKING for such spaces.)

Paul

[pauldude000]

Just a side note, I would almost bet Mr. Steven Mark is here already, posting under an alias.

Paul

[otto]

Hello all,

Gentlemen,

would you please use just 1 9V battery?

Otto

[wattsup]

@otto

Maybe 2. lol