I need help with a KEELY project

[Pirate88179]

Hans:

Fantastic photo!  I have a question for you.  Would the information that you post here on this forum be considered publishing?  I am not up to date on internet law, which is accelerating so fast I doubt anyone can keep up with it.  the reason I ask is this...suppose you publish an idea here on your Keely project and someone sees it and rushes for a patent.  I know the spirit here is open source and I agree with that spirit.  I was just wondering that if this indeed happened, could you then make their patent null and void based upon your prior publication of the idea on this site?  If this is the case, then I think a lot of people would be even more open with their ideas and projects. 

One day, I would love to hear a detailed explanation of what I have observed in your latest photo of the resonator inside a resonator.  I am just amazed at what has been buried by history and time.  Who ever constructed that apparatus (Keely) obviously had a plan for doing so and I believed it did what he said it did.  Thanks.

Bill

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Bill and all,

Just about everything I am saying about Keely here I said some time ago on my website. My website carries a copyright notice and therefore anything published here and there is, as far as the law is concerned "publishing". As far as I am concerned the project I am trying to stimulate is open source. I do not want any money or royalties, perhaps not even recognition for my contribution if that is the way it pans out. I simply want to make Keely's technology accessible to everyone. Not the dreamboy theety weety esoteric bullshit that has been floating around for over 120 years and has never done anyone any good, but the real stuff.

I know I am putting myself into the firing line by doing this.

As of now I am starting a new thread called "Dissociating Water, A Keely Project". This is an open source project that is accessible to everyone and everyone is invited to participate.

See you there.

Hans von Lieven

[jeffc]

G'day Bill and all,

Just about everything I am saying about Keely here I said some time ago on my website. My website carries a copyright notice and therefore anything published here and there is, as far as the law is concerned "publishing". As far as I am concerned the project I am trying to stimulate is open source. I do not want any money or royalties, perhaps not even recognition for my contribution if that is the way it pans out. I simply want to make Keely's technology accessible to everyone. Not the dreamboy theety weety esoteric bullshit that has been floating around for over 120 years and has never done anyone any good, but the real stuff.

I know I am putting myself into the firing line by doing this.

As of now I am starting a new thread called "Dissociating Water, A Keely Project". This is an open source project that is accessible to everyone and everyone is invited to participate.

See you there.

Hans von Lieven

Patents should be rejected and can be invalidated by "prior art".  The term refers not only to copyrighted publications, but also to opensource, public domain, etc.  If yo publish something, and can provide evidence of the content and date, then a patent for an invention with the same characteristics is not valid.

Regards,
jeffc

[hansvonlieven]

Thanks Jeff,

We'll beat those scheming shyster lawyers yet. :-)

Hans von Lieven

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

This thread has been asleep for a while and I thought it was dead.

Today I received an E-mail from someone who has evidently done some work on my problem. I am just waiting for his permission to publish his communication, in the meantime have a look what this guy has done with a mathematical programme. More later, here is a screenshot:

Hans von Lieven