Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

Started by giantkiller, September 22, 2007, 12:39:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

aleks

Quote from: giantkiller on April 03, 2008, 10:40:20 AMNot the water but the kinetic effect. When that force impacts an obstacle the object is obliterated. Size does not matter.
Well, matter can be made 'intelligent' (bio organisms) and a wall built from intelligent elements won't be easy to break with any force. Resonance is a brute force thing, it's not 'smart'. The reality of intelligent matter is what allows us to extract energy from everywhere: we are intelligent matter, that's why we 'own' non-intelligent matter. Unfortunately for us, the substance which makes up what we call matter 'owns' us. This substance can be also intelligent, much more intelligent than us in fact. 'Non-intelligent' matter is also intelligent, but it can only repel in a hope to find a place of minimal repelling force from the neighbours. But even unconditional repelling is so 'dumb' that it makes creation of attracting force out of repelling a possibility.

M@rcel

Otto, please keep on making this noise, I love it!  :)

Quote from: otto on April 03, 2008, 07:58:36 AM
Hello all,

@point99

Im happy to make only noise.

Otto

Feynman

Tonight I tried running the LTC6904 into a 6N138 opto-isolator.    This is a little chip with an LED and photodiode inside that lets you decouple parts of a circuit.


This worked great from 1khz up to 300khz.  After 300khz, the wave got started turning ugly and at 1Mhz the  6N138 refused to switch the pulses.  This was a success, it just means I need to order a faster opto-isolator.

I think it will go

LTC6903 ----pulses----->  high speed buffer   ---->  optoisolator ---->  MOSFETs/tubes


giantkiller

http://img403.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vortex2dh0.swf

Per Patrick Flanagan:

The Yellow is the counterclockwise pulse direction. The Green is the clockwise pulse direction. The pulses also reflect the magnetic field direction of travel. As those fields spin ions are dragged in by the heterodyning mag fields in between the coils where they meet. This drag is documented in other areas. The Blue respresents the ejection of ions on the horizontal plane. The angle of the vertical portion of the blue arrows represents the ions pulled downward and upward. This is the vortex.
The frequency represented here is 4x the circumference frequency. By adding more turns the initial frequency can be divided down. That is because now where the pulse hits is at a different distance down the wire. But because there is a loop the runs are in parallel. The loop sees it at some matching circumferal place. If you have 8 turns and fire the pulse at the 1 turn circumferal distance then you will have 8 pulses in the same circumferal distance of the loop.
See where this is going?
Now if the loop is part of a tank the ringing sustains. We heterodyne with colliding fields any where we want on the loop. 
See where this just went?
Now another loop is added and the same process is added to that loop but in an opposing direction.
Where did this just go?
Now there are 2 toroidal magnetic fields spinning against each other twisting the vortex. Pump the force faster and create more effect. Schaumberger. Keely, Tesla, Hutchison.
Also Marco posted the vortex in one of my coil graphics 18 months ago.
Where do you think it comes from?

--giantkiller.

M@rcel

Quote from: giantkiller on April 04, 2008, 04:27:18 PM
http://img403.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vortex2dh0.swf

Per Patrick Flanagan:

The Yellow is the counterclockwise pulse direction. The Green is the clockwise pulse direction. The pulses also reflect the magnetic field direction of travel. As those fields spin ions are dragged in by the heterodyning mag fields in between the coils where they meet. This drag is documented in other areas. The Blue respresents the ejection of ions on the horizontal plane. The angle of the vertical portion of the blue arrows represents the ions pulled downward and upward. This is the vortex.
The frequency represented here is 4x the circumference frequency. By adding more turns the initial frequency can be divided down. That is because now where the pulse hits is at a different distance down the wire. But because there is a loop the runs are in parallel. The loop sees it at some matching circumferal place. If you have 8 turns and fire the pulse at the 1 turn circumferal distance then you will have 8 pulses in the same circumferal distance of the loop.
See where this is going?
Now if the loop is part of a tank the ringing sustains. We heterodyne with colliding fields any where we want on the loop. 
See where this just went?
Now another loop is added and the same process is added to that loop but in an opposing direction.
Where did this just go?
Now there are 2 toroidal magnetic fields spinning against each other twisting the vortex. Pump the force faster and create more effect. Schaumberger. Keely, Tesla, Hutchison.
Also Marco posted the vortex in one of my coil graphics 18 months ago.
Where do you think it comes from?

--giantkiller.
gk,

Can you tell us something about the relation of the above with the LMDTEM?