Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[giantkiller]

    I like Naudin's explanation of Tesla's waves.  You can see how they can keep their shit together.  They screw with the aether instead of the aether screwing with them.  Now if you keep those waves on a circular track you are bound to get some crazy shit going on.  Thanks Gk for the feed.  I had know idea what Tesla was talking about when he said non-hertzian electromagnetic waves.

Yes. When looking at the circular TEM you drive 2 loops in the same direction the mag fields run in opposite directions into each other between the layers. That clash occurs 8 times on the GK4 becauseI have 3 layers. It explains the profuse effect coming off the sides. I didn't know it at the time I was testing. To quote the master 'I stumbled upon it'. My test just shot energy radially outward. Now I understand.
A test that I have in the wings now is to retest the GK4 but drive the center layer in the opposite direction effectly creating 2 Circular TEMs in parallel. Can't be all wrong if this is a compound assignment of previous successfull tests by others now can it?

--giantkiller. I have a long test list...

[poynt99]

@BEP,

If you are so certain that heterodyning is the correct term to be used in this work, surely you can explain how exactly gk is obtaining this with his speaker setup?

spend all your time letting the smoke out of all your chips if that makes you feel better, and if the fundamentals that you learned slip out of memory and clarity, it's no big deal....right? Who needs 'em?

heaven forbid you should learn something new that you can apply at the bench right?

what bunkum

[wattsup]

@GK

I know I was rough. I would be rough with anyone that has OU and blunders it so badly.

@ALL

Sorry to bud in.

I just found this document and at this part of it has some very interesting stuff.
You can read the whole page but in general here is some nice information.
http://www.thewebfairy.com/missilegate/rfz/swaz/chapter13.htm#e

The whole doc starts here;
http://www.thewebfairy.com/missilegate/rfz/swaz/

@GK

It's OK, You are still a hero in my book.

[aleks]

you don't have heterodyning.

You do not get the point. Transformers and coils are known to be non-linear and prone to effect called 'saturation'. This is where heterodyning happens, especially when two or more coils have overlapping EM fields. Since each coil carries its own frequency this creates a heterodyning effect.

Heterodyning effect should also happen on the edge of vibrating surface - where acoustic wave changes its direction (where it is 'reborn' if we are speaking about resonance). If you have two sound sources striking such vibrating surface under different angles this may also create heterodyning effect with a new frequency popping out of nowhere. Hence the three speaker arrangement may work to produce some new kind of frequency. It may be even pretty hard to 'see' what this arrangement may produce: it's an overly complex system, with two modes near the cone of each speaker. These modes are also modulated by the speaker cone, this should produce a Dopler effect and hence a birth of two new frequencies: one low (when cone goes back) and one high (when cone goes forth).

After a bit of thought, I should say that this arrangement can also help at production of DC acoustic waves if all speakers are running at the same frequency. You may carry out a test and it should show that speakers are moving toward each other or vice versa - run from each other. If the speakers are placed on wheels, this effect should be most apparent. If this proves to be valid, the reality of this effect can be much more deep and it can be used for more than just shaking walls (have you tried putting a plain copper wire in front of any of these cones and measuring voltage on its ends? - well, both ends of the wire should be placed several feets out of the circle with these speakers - you may not even need a closed circuit: just put voltagemeter terminal on ground and the other terminal on one of the ends of the wire; only one thing is needed here: that the wire is placed closely to the cone where hypothetical DC acoustic wave is born). Or you may run a wire near all cones and connect both ends to close the loop. Use ground and this connection as a possible energy source.

Of course, standard cones are not the best test device since they are dish-shaped. Solid-state planar resonators is a better thing.

Well, after these ideas the 'secret' of Stonehenge is probably resolved for me. It's clearly a constant anti-gravity 'hill' with force peaks and dips depending on the time of day and season. If soul is a physical substance it may become liberated in an anti-gravity field - but you should stay near the vertical stone, there is no 'mystical' power in the center of the Stonehenge. If you run a closed wire along the circumference of the working Stonehenge you may get some electrical energy with Earth being "-" and the closed wire being "+".

[aleks]

non-hertzian electromagnetic waves.

Check my DC acoustic waves hypothesis. They can be also called 'non-hertzian' since they do not have an inherent 'period of oscillation', but their intensity can be modulated.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Anti-Gravity:DC_Acoustic_Waves_Hypothesis I really think this should put down a lot of 'nay' sayers with enough competence in multi-dimensional Fourier transforms. They were looking into a wrong direction. They can't deny mathematical existence of DC acoustic waves.